FirePro V5900 vs Quadro K620

Find out if it is worth upgrading your current GPU setup by comparing FirePro V5900 and Quadro K620. Here you can take a closer look at graphics cards specs, such as core clock speed, memory type and size, display connectors, etc. The price, overall benchmark and gaming performances are usually defining factors when it comes to choosing between FirePro V5900 and Quadro K620. Make sure that the graphics card has compatible dimensions and will properly fit in your new or current computer case. Also these graphics cards may have different system power recommendations, so take that into consideration and upgrade your PSU if necessary.

FirePro V5900 Check Price

Quadro K620 Check Price

Main Specs

	FirePro V5900	Quadro K620
Power consumption (TDP)	75 Watt	41 Watt
Interface	PCIe 2.0 x16	PCIe 2.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors	None	None
Memory type	GDDR5	128 Bit
Maximum RAM amount	2 GB	2 GB
Display Connectors	1x DVI	1x DVI, 1x DisplayPort
	Check Price	Check Price

FirePro V5900 has 82% more power consumption, than Quadro K620.
Both video cards are using PCIe 2.0 x16 interface connection to a motherboard.
FirePro V5900 and Quadro K620 have maximum RAM of 2 GB.
Both cards are used in Desktops.
FirePro V5900 is build with TeraScale 3 architecture, and Quadro K620 - with Maxwell.
Core clock speed of Quadro K620 is 458 MHz higher, than FirePro V5900.
FirePro V5900 is manufactured by 40 nm process technology, and Quadro K620 - by 28 nm process technology.
FirePro V5900 is 70 mm longer, than Quadro K620.
Memory clock speed of FirePro V5900 is 200 MHz higher, than Quadro K620.

Game benchmarks


high / 1080p	4−5	10−12
ultra / 1080p	2−3	6−7
QHD / 1440p	1−2	1−2
low / 720p	14−16	24−27
medium / 1080p	7−8	14−16
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K620 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 83% more, than FirePro V5900.
high / 1080p	10−11	18−20
ultra / 1080p	8−9	16−18
QHD / 1440p	0−1	2−3
low / 720p	21−24	40−45
medium / 1080p	10−12	20−22
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K620 in Battlefield 5 is 84% more, than FirePro V5900.
low / 768p	45−50	45−50
high / 1080p	40−45	−
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
FirePro V5900 and Quadro K620 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone.
low / 768p	130−140	180−190
medium / 768p	100−110	150−160
ultra / 1080p	50−55	75−80
QHD / 1440p	24−27	45−50
4K / 2160p	12−14	30−33
high / 768p	75−80	110−120
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K620 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 48% more, than FirePro V5900.
low / 768p	50−55	55−60
ultra / 1080p	18−20	30−35
medium / 1080p	45−50	45−50
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K620 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 15% more, than FirePro V5900.
low / 768p	80−85	95−100
medium / 768p	55−60	80−85
ultra / 1080p	30−35	50−55
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K620 in Dota 2 is 35% more, than FirePro V5900.
high / 1080p	6−7	12−14
ultra / 1080p	5−6	12−14
4K / 2160p	5−6	5−6
low / 720p	16−18	30−33
medium / 1080p	7−8	14−16
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K620 in Far Cry 5 is 87% more, than FirePro V5900.
high / 1080p	7−8	20−22
ultra / 1080p	0−1	14−16
QHD / 1440p	0−1	−
low / 720p	55−60	80−85
medium / 1080p	18−20	40−45
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K620 in Fortnite is 71% more, than FirePro V5900.
high / 1080p	10−11	20−22
ultra / 1080p	−	16−18
QHD / 1440p	−	5−6
4K / 2160p	8−9	−
low / 720p	21−24	40−45
medium / 1080p	12−14	21−24
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K620 in Forza Horizon 4 is 86% more, than FirePro V5900.
low / 768p	50−55	70−75
medium / 768p	−	60−65
high / 1080p	10−11	21−24
ultra / 1080p	4−5	9−10
QHD / 1440p	−	0−1
medium / 720p	40−45	−
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K620 in Grand Theft Auto V is 54% more, than FirePro V5900.
high / 1080p	3−4	7−8
ultra / 1080p	1−2	5−6
4K / 2160p	−	1−2
low / 720p	10−11	21−24
medium / 1080p	4−5	10−11
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K620 in Metro Exodus is 120% more, than FirePro V5900.
low / 768p	90−95	100−110
ultra / 1080p	80−85	95−100
medium / 1080p	−	100−110
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K620 in Minecraft is 16% more, than FirePro V5900.
high / 1080p	6−7	20−22
ultra / 1080p	2−3	16−18
4K / 2160p	0−1	−
low / 720p	27−30	45−50
medium / 1080p	9−10	21−24
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K620 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 145% more, than FirePro V5900.
high / 1080p	−	12−14
ultra / 1080p	−	8−9
QHD / 1440p	−	0−1
low / 720p	10−11	21−24
medium / 1080p	9−10	14−16
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K620 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 80% more, than FirePro V5900.
low / 768p	20−22	40−45
medium / 768p	12−14	24−27
high / 1080p	6−7	14−16
ultra / 1080p	4−5	9−10
4K / 2160p	3−4	7−8
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K620 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 122% more, than FirePro V5900.
low / 768p	75−80	95−100
medium / 768p	40−45	55−60
ultra / 1080p	18−20	27−30
high / 768p	30−35	45−50
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K620 in World of Tanks is 35% more, than FirePro V5900.

Full Specs

	FirePro V5900	Quadro K620
Architecture	TeraScale 3	Maxwell
Code name	Cayman	GM107
Type	Workstation	Workstation
Release date	24 May 2011	22 July 2014
Pipelines	512	384
Core clock speed	600 MHz	1058 MHz
Boost Clock		1124 MHz
Transistor count	2,640 million	1,870 million
Manufacturing process technology	40 nm	28 nm
Texture fill rate	19.20	26.98
Floating-point performance	614.4 gflops	863.2 gflops
Length	230 mm	160 mm
Memory bus width	256 Bit	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	2000 MHz	1800 MHz
Memory bandwidth	64 GB/s
DirectX	11.2 (11_0)	12
Shader Model	5.0	5
OpenGL	4.4	4.5
OpenCL	1.2	1.2
Vulkan	N/A	+
CUDA		5.0
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)	66 Mh/s	104 Mh/s
3D Vision Pro		+
Mosaic		+
Width		1" (2.5 cm)
Number of simultaneous displays		4
nView Desktop Management		+
	Check Price	Check Price

FirePro V5900 vs Quadro K620

Main Specs

Game benchmarks

Full Specs

Similar compares