FirePro V5900 vs Quadro M2000M
In this comparison between FirePro V5900 and Quadro M2000M you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people FirePro V5900 will be the best choice, for others Quadro M2000M will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
Quadro M2000M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Quadro M2000M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro M2000M here:
Main Specs
FirePro V5900
Quadro M2000M
Power consumption (TDP)
75 Watt
55 Watt
Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
MXM-A (3.0)
Supplementary power connectors
None
None
Memory type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount
2 GB
4 GB
Display Connectors
1x DVI
No outputs
Check Price
Check Price
FirePro V5900 has 36% more power consumption, than Quadro M2000M.
FirePro V5900 is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and Quadro M2000M uses MXM-A (3.0) interface.
Quadro M2000M has 2 GB more memory, than FirePro V5900.
FirePro V5900 is used in Desktops, and Quadro M2000M - in Mobile workstations.
FirePro V5900 is build with TeraScale 3 architecture, and Quadro M2000M - with Maxwell.
Core clock speed of Quadro M2000M is 438 MHz higher, than FirePro V5900.
FirePro V5900 is manufactured by 40 nm process technology, and Quadro M2000M - by 28 nm process technology.
Memory clock speed of Quadro M2000M is 3000 MHz higher, than FirePro V5900.
Game benchmarks
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Battlefield 5
Call of Duty: Warzone
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Cyberpunk 2077
Dota 2
Far Cry 5
Fortnite
Forza Horizon 4
Grand Theft Auto V
Metro Exodus
Minecraft
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS
Red Dead Redemption 2
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
World of Tanks
high / 1080p
4−5
18−20
ultra / 1080p
2−3
10−11
QHD / 1440p
1−2
4−5
4K / 2160p
−
4−5
low / 720p
14−16
35−40
medium / 1080p
7−8
21−24
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000M in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 200% more, than FirePro V5900.
high / 1080p
10−11
27−30
ultra / 1080p
8−9
24−27
QHD / 1440p
0−1
8−9
4K / 2160p
−
6−7
low / 720p
21−24
60−65
medium / 1080p
10−12
30−35
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000M in Battlefield 5 is 184% more, than FirePro V5900.
low / 768p
45−50
50−55
high / 1080p
40−45
50−55
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000M in Call of Duty: Warzone is 15% more, than FirePro V5900.
low / 768p
130−140
220−230
medium / 768p
100−110
190−200
ultra / 1080p
50−55
110−120
QHD / 1440p
24−27
70−75
4K / 2160p
12−14
40−45
high / 768p
75−80
150−160
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000M in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 97% more, than FirePro V5900.
low / 768p
50−55
60−65
ultra / 1080p
18−20
45−50
medium / 1080p
45−50
55−60
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000M in Cyberpunk 2077 is 41% more, than FirePro V5900.
low / 768p
80−85
110−120
medium / 768p
55−60
100−110
ultra / 1080p
30−35
75−80
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000M in Dota 2 is 73% more, than FirePro V5900.
high / 1080p
6−7
21−24
ultra / 1080p
5−6
20−22
QHD / 1440p
−
18−20
4K / 2160p
5−6
7−8
low / 720p
16−18
45−50
medium / 1080p
7−8
24−27
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000M in Far Cry 5 is 200% more, than FirePro V5900.
high / 1080p
7−8
27−30
ultra / 1080p
0−1
21−24
QHD / 1440p
0−1
14−16
low / 720p
55−60
110−120
medium / 1080p
18−20
65−70
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000M in Fortnite is 150% more, than FirePro V5900.
high / 1080p
10−11
30−35
ultra / 1080p
−
21−24
QHD / 1440p
−
10−12
4K / 2160p
8−9
−
low / 720p
21−24
60−65
medium / 1080p
12−14
35−40
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000M in Forza Horizon 4 is 193% more, than FirePro V5900.
low / 768p
50−55
95−100
medium / 768p
−
85−90
high / 1080p
10−11
35−40
ultra / 1080p
4−5
14−16
QHD / 1440p
−
5−6
medium / 720p
40−45
−
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000M in Grand Theft Auto V is 127% more, than FirePro V5900.
high / 1080p
3−4
10−12
ultra / 1080p
1−2
9−10
4K / 2160p
−
2−3
low / 720p
10−11
35−40
medium / 1080p
4−5
16−18
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000M in Metro Exodus is 260% more, than FirePro V5900.
low / 768p
90−95
110−120
ultra / 1080p
80−85
−
medium / 1080p
−
110−120
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000M in Minecraft is 25% more, than FirePro V5900.
high / 1080p
6−7
−
ultra / 1080p
2−3
14−16
4K / 2160p
0−1
−
low / 720p
27−30
65−70
medium / 1080p
9−10
18−20
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000M in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 153% more, than FirePro V5900.
high / 1080p
−
14−16
ultra / 1080p
−
9−10
QHD / 1440p
−
0−1
low / 720p
10−11
35−40
medium / 1080p
9−10
18−20
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000M in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 180% more, than FirePro V5900.
low / 768p
20−22
65−70
medium / 768p
12−14
40−45
high / 1080p
6−7
21−24
ultra / 1080p
4−5
12−14
4K / 2160p
3−4
7−8
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000M in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 233% more, than FirePro V5900.
low / 768p
75−80
90−95
medium / 768p
40−45
60−65
ultra / 1080p
18−20
35−40
high / 768p
30−35
55−60
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000M in World of Tanks is 47% more, than FirePro V5900.
Full Specs
FirePro V5900
Quadro M2000M
Architecture
TeraScale 3
Maxwell
Code name
Cayman
GM107
Type
Workstation
Mobile workstation
Release date
24 May 2011
2 October 2015
Pipelines
512
640
Core clock speed
600 MHz
1038 MHz
Boost Clock
1197 MHz
Transistor count
2,640 million
1,870 million
Manufacturing process technology
40 nm
28 nm
Texture fill rate
19.20
43.92
Floating-point performance
614.4 gflops
1,405 gflops
Length
230 mm
Memory bus width
256 Bit
128 Bit
Memory clock speed
2000 MHz
5000 MHz
Memory bandwidth
64 GB/s
80 GB/s
Shared memory
-
DirectX
11.2 (11_0)
12
Shader Model
5.0
5.0
OpenGL
4.4
4.5
OpenCL
1.2
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
1.1.126
CUDA
5.0
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)
66 Mh/s
173 Mh/s
Laptop size
large
Optimus
+
Display Port
1.2
3D Vision Pro
+
Mosaic
+
nView Display Management
+
Check Price
Check Price