FirePro V5900 vs Quadro M620

In this comparison between FirePro V5900 and Quadro M620 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people FirePro V5900 will be the best choice, for others Quadro M620 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.

FirePro V5900 Check Price

Quadro M620 Check Price

Quadro M620 is a Laptop Graphics Card

Note: Quadro M620 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro M620 here:

Quadro M620 Laptops

Main Specs

	FirePro V5900	Quadro M620
Power consumption (TDP)	75 Watt	30 Watt
Interface	PCIe 2.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors	None
Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount	2 GB	2 GB
Display Connectors	1x DVI
	Check Price	Check Price

FirePro V5900 has 150% more power consumption, than Quadro M620.
FirePro V5900 and Quadro M620 have maximum RAM of 2 GB.
FirePro V5900 is used in Desktops, and Quadro M620 - in Mobile workstations.
FirePro V5900 is build with TeraScale 3 architecture, and Quadro M620 - with Maxwell.
Core clock speed of Quadro M620 is 418 MHz higher, than FirePro V5900.
FirePro V5900 is manufactured by 40 nm process technology, and Quadro M620 - by 28 nm process technology.
Memory clock speed of Quadro M620 is 3012 MHz higher, than FirePro V5900.

Game benchmarks


high / 1080p	4−5	14−16
ultra / 1080p	2−3	8−9
QHD / 1440p	1−2	3−4
low / 720p	14−16	30−35
medium / 1080p	7−8	18−20
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M620 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 150% more, than FirePro V5900.
high / 1080p	10−11	24−27
ultra / 1080p	8−9	20−22
QHD / 1440p	0−1	7−8
4K / 2160p	−	5−6
low / 720p	21−24	50−55
medium / 1080p	10−12	24−27
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M620 in Battlefield 5 is 138% more, than FirePro V5900.
low / 768p	45−50	45−50
high / 1080p	40−45	−
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
FirePro V5900 and Quadro M620 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone.
low / 768p	130−140	200−210
medium / 768p	100−110	170−180
ultra / 1080p	50−55	95−100
QHD / 1440p	24−27	50−55
4K / 2160p	12−14	30−33
high / 768p	75−80	130−140
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M620 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 70% more, than FirePro V5900.
low / 768p	50−55	55−60
ultra / 1080p	18−20	35−40
medium / 1080p	45−50	45−50
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M620 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 20% more, than FirePro V5900.
low / 768p	80−85	100−110
medium / 768p	55−60	90−95
ultra / 1080p	30−35	60−65
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M620 in Dota 2 is 50% more, than FirePro V5900.
high / 1080p	6−7	16−18
ultra / 1080p	5−6	16−18
4K / 2160p	5−6	6−7
low / 720p	16−18	35−40
medium / 1080p	7−8	18−20
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M620 in Far Cry 5 is 137% more, than FirePro V5900.
high / 1080p	7−8	24−27
ultra / 1080p	0−1	18−20
QHD / 1440p	0−1	16−18
low / 720p	55−60	95−100
medium / 1080p	18−20	50−55
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M620 in Fortnite is 107% more, than FirePro V5900.
high / 1080p	10−11	24−27
ultra / 1080p	−	20−22
QHD / 1440p	−	8−9
4K / 2160p	8−9	−
low / 720p	21−24	50−55
medium / 1080p	12−14	27−30
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M620 in Forza Horizon 4 is 133% more, than FirePro V5900.
low / 768p	50−55	85−90
medium / 768p	−	75−80
high / 1080p	10−11	27−30
ultra / 1080p	4−5	12−14
QHD / 1440p	−	2−3
medium / 720p	40−45	−
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M620 in Grand Theft Auto V is 95% more, than FirePro V5900.
high / 1080p	3−4	9−10
ultra / 1080p	1−2	7−8
4K / 2160p	−	2−3
low / 720p	10−11	27−30
medium / 1080p	4−5	12−14
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M620 in Metro Exodus is 180% more, than FirePro V5900.
low / 768p	90−95	110−120
ultra / 1080p	80−85	100−110
medium / 1080p	−	100−110
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M620 in Minecraft is 26% more, than FirePro V5900.
high / 1080p	6−7	21−24
ultra / 1080p	2−3	16−18
4K / 2160p	0−1	−
low / 720p	27−30	55−60
medium / 1080p	9−10	24−27
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M620 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 172% more, than FirePro V5900.
high / 1080p	−	14−16
ultra / 1080p	−	9−10
QHD / 1440p	−	0−1
low / 720p	10−11	27−30
medium / 1080p	9−10	16−18
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M620 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 120% more, than FirePro V5900.
low / 768p	20−22	50−55
medium / 768p	12−14	30−35
high / 1080p	6−7	18−20
ultra / 1080p	4−5	10−12
4K / 2160p	3−4	8−9
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M620 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 166% more, than FirePro V5900.
low / 768p	75−80	100−110
medium / 768p	40−45	60−65
ultra / 1080p	18−20	30−35
high / 768p	30−35	50−55
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M620 in World of Tanks is 50% more, than FirePro V5900.

Full Specs

	FirePro V5900	Quadro M620
Architecture	TeraScale 3	Maxwell
Code name	Cayman
Type	Workstation	Mobile workstation
Release date	24 May 2011	13 January 2017
Pipelines	512	512
Core clock speed	600 MHz	1018 MHz
Transistor count	2,640 million
Manufacturing process technology	40 nm	28 nm
Texture fill rate	19.20
Floating-point performance	614.4 gflops
Length	230 mm
Memory bus width	256 Bit	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	2000 MHz	5012 MHz
Memory bandwidth	64 GB/s	80 GB/s
Shared memory		-
DirectX	11.2 (11_0)	12
Shader Model	5.0	5.0
OpenGL	4.4	4.5
OpenCL	1.2
Vulkan	N/A
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)	66 Mh/s
Laptop size		large
Optimus		+
Display Port		1.2
Mosaic		+
nView Display Management		+
3D Stereo		+
	Check Price	Check Price

FirePro V5900 vs Quadro M620

Quadro M620 is a Laptop Graphics Card

Main Specs

Game benchmarks

Full Specs

Similar compares