FirePro V5900 vs Quadro P500

When choosing between FirePro V5900 and Quadro P500, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between FirePro V5900 and Quadro P500.

FirePro V5900 Check Price

Quadro P500 Check Price

Quadro P500 is a Laptop Graphics Card

Note: Quadro P500 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro P500 here:

Quadro P500 Laptops

Main Specs

	FirePro V5900	Quadro P500
Power consumption (TDP)	75 Watt	30 Watt
Interface	PCIe 2.0 x16	PCIe 3.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors	None	None
Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount	2 GB	2 GB
Display Connectors	1x DVI	3x mini-DisplayPort
	Check Price	Check Price

FirePro V5900 has 150% more power consumption, than Quadro P500.
FirePro V5900 is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and Quadro P500 uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
FirePro V5900 and Quadro P500 have maximum RAM of 2 GB.
FirePro V5900 is used in Desktops, and Quadro P500 - in Mobile workstations.
FirePro V5900 is build with TeraScale 3 architecture, and Quadro P500 - with Pascal.
Core clock speed of Quadro P500 is 855 MHz higher, than FirePro V5900.
FirePro V5900 is manufactured by 40 nm process technology, and Quadro P500 - by 14 nm process technology.
Memory clock speed of Quadro P500 is 3012 MHz higher, than FirePro V5900.

Game benchmarks


high / 1080p	4−5	8−9
ultra / 1080p	2−3	5−6
QHD / 1440p	1−2	0−1
low / 720p	14−16	18−20
medium / 1080p	7−8	10−11
The average gaming FPS of Quadro P500 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 42% more, than FirePro V5900.
high / 1080p	10−11	14−16
ultra / 1080p	8−9	12−14
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
low / 720p	21−24	30−33
medium / 1080p	10−12	14−16
The average gaming FPS of Quadro P500 in Battlefield 5 is 38% more, than FirePro V5900.
low / 768p	45−50	45−50
high / 1080p	40−45	45−50
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
The average gaming FPS of Quadro P500 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 4% more, than FirePro V5900.
low / 768p	130−140	150−160
medium / 768p	100−110	120−130
ultra / 1080p	50−55	60−65
QHD / 1440p	24−27	35−40
4K / 2160p	12−14	27−30
high / 768p	75−80	90−95
The average gaming FPS of Quadro P500 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 22% more, than FirePro V5900.
low / 768p	50−55	55−60
ultra / 1080p	18−20	21−24
medium / 1080p	45−50	45−50
The average gaming FPS of Quadro P500 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 7% more, than FirePro V5900.
low / 768p	80−85	85−90
medium / 768p	55−60	65−70
ultra / 1080p	30−35	40−45
The average gaming FPS of Quadro P500 in Dota 2 is 14% more, than FirePro V5900.
high / 1080p	6−7	10−11
ultra / 1080p	5−6	9−10
4K / 2160p	5−6	4−5
low / 720p	16−18	21−24
medium / 1080p	7−8	10−11
The average gaming FPS of Quadro P500 in Far Cry 5 is 37% more, than FirePro V5900.
high / 1080p	7−8	16−18
ultra / 1080p	0−1	12−14
QHD / 1440p	0−1	−
low / 720p	55−60	65−70
medium / 1080p	18−20	27−30
The average gaming FPS of Quadro P500 in Fortnite is 32% more, than FirePro V5900.
high / 1080p	10−11	14−16
ultra / 1080p	−	12−14
QHD / 1440p	−	2−3
4K / 2160p	8−9	−
low / 720p	21−24	30−35
medium / 1080p	12−14	16−18
The average gaming FPS of Quadro P500 in Forza Horizon 4 is 40% more, than FirePro V5900.
low / 768p	50−55	55−60
medium / 768p	−	50−55
high / 1080p	10−11	14−16
ultra / 1080p	4−5	7−8
QHD / 1440p	−	0−1
medium / 720p	40−45	−
The average gaming FPS of Quadro P500 in Grand Theft Auto V is 18% more, than FirePro V5900.
high / 1080p	3−4	5−6
ultra / 1080p	1−2	4−5
4K / 2160p	−	1−2
low / 720p	10−11	14−16
medium / 1080p	4−5	7−8
The average gaming FPS of Quadro P500 in Metro Exodus is 60% more, than FirePro V5900.
low / 768p	90−95	95−100
high / 1080p	−	90−95
ultra / 1080p	80−85	85−90
medium / 1080p	−	95−100
The average gaming FPS of Quadro P500 in Minecraft is 5% more, than FirePro V5900.
high / 1080p	6−7	18−20
ultra / 1080p	2−3	14−16
4K / 2160p	0−1	−
low / 720p	27−30	35−40
medium / 1080p	9−10	18−20
The average gaming FPS of Quadro P500 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 100% more, than FirePro V5900.
ultra / 1080p	−	8−9
QHD / 1440p	−	0−1
low / 720p	10−11	14−16
medium / 1080p	9−10	12−14
The average gaming FPS of Quadro P500 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 40% more, than FirePro V5900.
low / 768p	20−22	30−33
medium / 768p	12−14	20−22
high / 1080p	6−7	10−12
ultra / 1080p	4−5	7−8
4K / 2160p	3−4	6−7
The average gaming FPS of Quadro P500 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 66% more, than FirePro V5900.
low / 768p	75−80	90−95
medium / 768p	40−45	45−50
ultra / 1080p	18−20	21−24
high / 768p	30−35	40−45
The average gaming FPS of Quadro P500 in World of Tanks is 21% more, than FirePro V5900.

Full Specs

	FirePro V5900	Quadro P500
Architecture	TeraScale 3	Pascal
Code name	Cayman	GP108
Type	Workstation	Mobile workstation
Release date	24 May 2011	14 November 2017
Pipelines	512	256
Core clock speed	600 MHz	1455 MHz
Boost Clock		1519 MHz
Transistor count	2,640 million	1,800 million
Manufacturing process technology	40 nm	14 nm
Texture fill rate	19.20	21.25
Floating-point performance	614.4 gflops	679.9 gflops
Length	230 mm
Memory bus width	256 Bit	64 Bit
Memory clock speed	2000 MHz	5012 MHz
Memory bandwidth	64 GB/s	32.1 GB/s
Shared memory		-
DirectX	11.2 (11_0)	12.1
Shader Model	5.0	5.1
OpenGL	4.4	4.6
OpenCL	1.2	1.2
Vulkan	N/A	1.1.0.1
CUDA		6.1
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)	66 Mh/s
Laptop size		large
	Check Price	Check Price

FirePro V5900 vs Quadro P500

Quadro P500 is a Laptop Graphics Card

Main Specs

Game benchmarks

Full Specs

Similar compares