FirePro V5900 vs Quadro P620

In this comparison between FirePro V5900 and Quadro P620 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people FirePro V5900 will be the best choice, for others Quadro P620 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.

FirePro V5900 Check Price

Quadro P620 Check Price

Main Specs

	FirePro V5900	Quadro P620
Power consumption (TDP)	75 Watt	40 Watt
Interface	PCIe 2.0 x16	PCIe 3.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors	None	None
Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount	2 GB	4 GB
Display Connectors	1x DVI	4x mini-DisplayPort
	Check Price	Check Price

FirePro V5900 has 87% more power consumption, than Quadro P620.
FirePro V5900 is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and Quadro P620 uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
Quadro P620 has 2 GB more memory, than FirePro V5900.
Both cards are used in Desktops.
FirePro V5900 is build with TeraScale 3 architecture, and Quadro P620 - with Pascal.
Core clock speed of Quadro P620 is 577 MHz higher, than FirePro V5900.
FirePro V5900 is manufactured by 40 nm process technology, and Quadro P620 - by 14 nm process technology.
FirePro V5900 is 85 mm longer, than Quadro P620.
Memory clock speed of Quadro P620 is 4000 MHz higher, than FirePro V5900.

Game benchmarks


high / 1080p	4−5	18−20
ultra / 1080p	2−3	10−12
QHD / 1440p	1−2	5−6
4K / 2160p	−	4−5
low / 720p	14−16	35−40
medium / 1080p	7−8	21−24
The average gaming FPS of Quadro P620 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 216% more, than FirePro V5900.
high / 1080p	10−11	30−33
ultra / 1080p	8−9	24−27
QHD / 1440p	0−1	9−10
4K / 2160p	−	7−8
low / 720p	21−24	60−65
medium / 1080p	10−12	30−35
The average gaming FPS of Quadro P620 in Battlefield 5 is 192% more, than FirePro V5900.
low / 768p	45−50	50−55
high / 1080p	40−45	−
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
The average gaming FPS of Quadro P620 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than FirePro V5900.
low / 768p	130−140	220−230
medium / 768p	100−110	190−200
ultra / 1080p	50−55	110−120
QHD / 1440p	24−27	80−85
4K / 2160p	12−14	40−45
high / 768p	75−80	160−170
The average gaming FPS of Quadro P620 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 101% more, than FirePro V5900.
low / 768p	50−55	60−65
ultra / 1080p	18−20	45−50
medium / 1080p	45−50	55−60
The average gaming FPS of Quadro P620 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 41% more, than FirePro V5900.
low / 768p	80−85	110−120
medium / 768p	55−60	100−110
ultra / 1080p	30−35	75−80
The average gaming FPS of Quadro P620 in Dota 2 is 73% more, than FirePro V5900.
high / 1080p	6−7	21−24
ultra / 1080p	5−6	21−24
QHD / 1440p	−	18−20
4K / 2160p	5−6	7−8
low / 720p	16−18	45−50
medium / 1080p	7−8	24−27
The average gaming FPS of Quadro P620 in Far Cry 5 is 212% more, than FirePro V5900.
high / 1080p	7−8	30−33
ultra / 1080p	0−1	21−24
QHD / 1440p	0−1	14−16
low / 720p	55−60	110−120
medium / 1080p	18−20	65−70
The average gaming FPS of Quadro P620 in Fortnite is 153% more, than FirePro V5900.
high / 1080p	10−11	30−35
ultra / 1080p	−	24−27
QHD / 1440p	−	12−14
4K / 2160p	8−9	12−14
low / 720p	21−24	65−70
medium / 1080p	12−14	35−40
The average gaming FPS of Quadro P620 in Forza Horizon 4 is 184% more, than FirePro V5900.
low / 768p	50−55	100−105
medium / 768p	−	85−90
high / 1080p	10−11	35−40
ultra / 1080p	4−5	14−16
QHD / 1440p	−	5−6
medium / 720p	40−45	−
The average gaming FPS of Quadro P620 in Grand Theft Auto V is 131% more, than FirePro V5900.
high / 1080p	3−4	12−14
ultra / 1080p	1−2	9−10
4K / 2160p	−	2−3
low / 720p	10−11	35−40
medium / 1080p	4−5	16−18
The average gaming FPS of Quadro P620 in Metro Exodus is 280% more, than FirePro V5900.
low / 768p	90−95	110−120
ultra / 1080p	80−85	−
medium / 1080p	−	110−120
The average gaming FPS of Quadro P620 in Minecraft is 25% more, than FirePro V5900.
high / 1080p	6−7	−
ultra / 1080p	2−3	14−16
4K / 2160p	0−1	−
low / 720p	27−30	65−70
medium / 1080p	9−10	18−20
The average gaming FPS of Quadro P620 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 153% more, than FirePro V5900.
high / 1080p	−	14−16
ultra / 1080p	−	9−10
QHD / 1440p	−	0−1
4K / 2160p	−	0−1
low / 720p	10−11	35−40
medium / 1080p	9−10	18−20
The average gaming FPS of Quadro P620 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 180% more, than FirePro V5900.
low / 768p	20−22	65−70
medium / 768p	12−14	40−45
high / 1080p	6−7	21−24
ultra / 1080p	4−5	12−14
4K / 2160p	3−4	7−8
The average gaming FPS of Quadro P620 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 233% more, than FirePro V5900.
low / 768p	75−80	90−95
medium / 768p	40−45	60−65
ultra / 1080p	18−20	40−45
high / 768p	30−35	55−60
The average gaming FPS of Quadro P620 in World of Tanks is 50% more, than FirePro V5900.

Full Specs

	FirePro V5900	Quadro P620
Architecture	TeraScale 3	Pascal
Code name	Cayman	GP107
Type	Workstation	Workstation
Release date	24 May 2011	27 May 2019
Pipelines	512	512
Core clock speed	600 MHz	1177 MHz
Boost Clock		1442 MHz
Transistor count	2,640 million	3,300 million
Manufacturing process technology	40 nm	14 nm
Texture fill rate	19.20	43.33
Floating-point performance	614.4 gflops	1,490 gflops
Length	230 mm	145 mm
Memory bus width	256 Bit	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	2000 MHz	6000 MHz
Memory bandwidth	64 GB/s	80.13 GB/s
Shared memory		-
DirectX	11.2 (11_0)	12 (12_1)
Shader Model	5.0	6.4
OpenGL	4.4	4.6
OpenCL	1.2	1.2
Vulkan	N/A	1.2.131
CUDA		6.1
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)	66 Mh/s
	Check Price	Check Price

FirePro V5900 vs Quadro P620

Main Specs

Game benchmarks

Full Specs

Similar compares