FirePro V5900 vs Tesla C2050
If you are going to buy a new graphics card and are choosing between FirePro V5900 and Tesla C2050, there are a couple of things to consider. Cards with more VRAM in general perform better and allow you to play on higher graphics settings. Size also makes a difference. A model with a large heatsink can occupy up to three expansion slots on a motherboard. Be sure you have enough room in your PC case. When comparing GPUs with different architectures, more processing cores and even higher TFLOPS will not always translate to better performance. To help you decide which GPU you need, we have measured frame rates in a number of popular games. For more on how the FirePro V5900 stacks up against Tesla C2050, check out specs charts below.
Tesla C2050
Main Specs
FirePro V5900
Tesla C2050
Power consumption (TDP)
75 Watt
238 Watt
Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
PCIe 2.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors
None
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Memory type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount
2 GB
3 GB
Display Connectors
1x DVI
1x DVI
Check Price
Tesla C2050 has 217% more power consumption, than FirePro V5900.
Both video cards are using PCIe 2.0 x16 interface connection to a motherboard.
Tesla C2050 has 1 GB more memory, than FirePro V5900.
Both cards are used in Desktops.
FirePro V5900 is build with TeraScale 3 architecture, and Tesla C2050 - with Fermi.
Core clock speed of FirePro V5900 is 26 MHz higher, than Tesla C2050.
FirePro V5900 and Tesla C2050 are manufactured by 40 nm process technology.
Tesla C2050 is 18 mm longer, than FirePro V5900.
Memory clock speed of Tesla C2050 is 1000 MHz higher, than FirePro V5900.
Game benchmarks
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Battlefield 5
Call of Duty: Warzone
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Cyberpunk 2077
Dota 2
Far Cry 5
Fortnite
Forza Horizon 4
Grand Theft Auto V
Metro Exodus
Minecraft
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS
Red Dead Redemption 2
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
World of Tanks
high / 1080p
4−5
18−20
ultra / 1080p
2−3
10−11
QHD / 1440p
1−2
4−5
4K / 2160p
−
4−5
low / 720p
14−16
35−40
medium / 1080p
7−8
21−24
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 200% more, than FirePro V5900.
high / 1080p
10−11
27−30
ultra / 1080p
8−9
24−27
QHD / 1440p
0−1
8−9
4K / 2160p
−
6−7
low / 720p
21−24
60−65
medium / 1080p
10−12
30−35
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Battlefield 5 is 184% more, than FirePro V5900.
low / 768p
45−50
50−55
high / 1080p
40−45
50−55
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 15% more, than FirePro V5900.
low / 768p
130−140
220−230
medium / 768p
100−110
190−200
ultra / 1080p
50−55
110−120
QHD / 1440p
24−27
70−75
4K / 2160p
12−14
35−40
high / 768p
75−80
150−160
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 95% more, than FirePro V5900.
low / 768p
50−55
60−65
ultra / 1080p
18−20
45−50
medium / 1080p
45−50
55−60
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 41% more, than FirePro V5900.
low / 768p
80−85
110−120
medium / 768p
55−60
100−110
ultra / 1080p
30−35
70−75
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Dota 2 is 70% more, than FirePro V5900.
high / 1080p
6−7
21−24
ultra / 1080p
5−6
20−22
QHD / 1440p
−
18−20
4K / 2160p
5−6
7−8
low / 720p
16−18
45−50
medium / 1080p
7−8
24−27
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Far Cry 5 is 200% more, than FirePro V5900.
high / 1080p
7−8
27−30
ultra / 1080p
0−1
21−24
QHD / 1440p
0−1
14−16
low / 720p
55−60
110−120
medium / 1080p
18−20
60−65
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Fortnite is 142% more, than FirePro V5900.
high / 1080p
10−11
30−35
ultra / 1080p
−
21−24
QHD / 1440p
−
10−12
4K / 2160p
8−9
−
low / 720p
21−24
60−65
medium / 1080p
12−14
35−40
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Forza Horizon 4 is 193% more, than FirePro V5900.
low / 768p
50−55
95−100
medium / 768p
−
85−90
high / 1080p
10−11
35−40
ultra / 1080p
4−5
14−16
QHD / 1440p
−
5−6
medium / 720p
40−45
−
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Grand Theft Auto V is 127% more, than FirePro V5900.
high / 1080p
3−4
10−12
ultra / 1080p
1−2
9−10
4K / 2160p
−
2−3
low / 720p
10−11
35−40
medium / 1080p
4−5
14−16
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Metro Exodus is 260% more, than FirePro V5900.
low / 768p
90−95
110−120
ultra / 1080p
80−85
−
medium / 1080p
−
110−120
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Minecraft is 25% more, than FirePro V5900.
high / 1080p
6−7
−
ultra / 1080p
2−3
14−16
4K / 2160p
0−1
−
low / 720p
27−30
65−70
medium / 1080p
9−10
18−20
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 153% more, than FirePro V5900.
high / 1080p
−
14−16
ultra / 1080p
−
9−10
QHD / 1440p
−
0−1
low / 720p
10−11
35−40
medium / 1080p
9−10
18−20
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 180% more, than FirePro V5900.
low / 768p
20−22
65−70
medium / 768p
12−14
40−45
high / 1080p
6−7
21−24
ultra / 1080p
4−5
12−14
4K / 2160p
3−4
7−8
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 233% more, than FirePro V5900.
low / 768p
75−80
90−95
medium / 768p
40−45
60−65
ultra / 1080p
18−20
35−40
high / 768p
30−35
55−60
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in World of Tanks is 47% more, than FirePro V5900.
Full Specs
FirePro V5900
Tesla C2050
Architecture
TeraScale 3
Fermi
Code name
Cayman
GF100
Type
Workstation
Workstation
Release date
24 May 2011
25 July 2011
Pipelines
512
448
Core clock speed
600 MHz
574 MHz
Transistor count
2,640 million
3,100 million
Manufacturing process technology
40 nm
40 nm
Texture fill rate
19.20
32.14
Floating-point performance
614.4 gflops
1,030.4 gflops
Length
230 mm
248 mm
Memory bus width
256 Bit
384 Bit
Memory clock speed
2000 MHz
3000 MHz
Memory bandwidth
64 GB/s
144.0 GB/s
DirectX
11.2 (11_0)
12 (11_0)
Shader Model
5.0
5.1
OpenGL
4.4
4.6
OpenCL
1.2
1.1
Vulkan
N/A
N/A
CUDA
2.0
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)
66 Mh/s
90 Mh/s
Check Price
