FirePro V5900 vs Tesla C2075

When choosing between FirePro V5900 and Tesla C2075, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between FirePro V5900 and Tesla C2075.

FirePro V5900 Check Price

Tesla C2075 Check Price

Main Specs

	FirePro V5900	Tesla C2075
Power consumption (TDP)	75 Watt	247 Watt
Interface	PCIe 2.0 x16	PCIe 2.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors	None	1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount	2 GB	6 GB
Display Connectors	1x DVI	1x DVI
	Check Price	Check Price

Tesla C2075 has 229% more power consumption, than FirePro V5900.
Both video cards are using PCIe 2.0 x16 interface connection to a motherboard.
Tesla C2075 has 4 GB more memory, than FirePro V5900.
Both cards are used in Desktops.
FirePro V5900 is build with TeraScale 3 architecture, and Tesla C2075 - with Fermi 2.0.
Core clock speed of FirePro V5900 is 26 MHz higher, than Tesla C2075.
FirePro V5900 and Tesla C2075 are manufactured by 40 nm process technology.
Tesla C2075 is 18 mm longer, than FirePro V5900.
Memory clock speed of Tesla C2075 is 1132 MHz higher, than FirePro V5900.

Game benchmarks


high / 1080p	4−5	16−18
ultra / 1080p	2−3	10−11
QHD / 1440p	1−2	4−5
low / 720p	14−16	35−40
medium / 1080p	7−8	21−24
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 200% more, than FirePro V5900.
high / 1080p	10−11	27−30
ultra / 1080p	8−9	21−24
QHD / 1440p	0−1	6−7
4K / 2160p	−	6−7
low / 720p	21−24	55−60
medium / 1080p	10−12	30−35
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in Battlefield 5 is 169% more, than FirePro V5900.
low / 768p	45−50	50−55
high / 1080p	40−45	50−55
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 15% more, than FirePro V5900.
low / 768p	130−140	210−220
medium / 768p	100−110	190−200
ultra / 1080p	50−55	100−110
QHD / 1440p	24−27	65−70
4K / 2160p	12−14	30−35
high / 768p	75−80	150−160
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 88% more, than FirePro V5900.
low / 768p	50−55	60−65
ultra / 1080p	18−20	45−50
medium / 1080p	45−50	55−60
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 41% more, than FirePro V5900.
low / 768p	80−85	110−120
medium / 768p	55−60	100−110
ultra / 1080p	30−35	70−75
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in Dota 2 is 70% more, than FirePro V5900.
high / 1080p	6−7	21−24
ultra / 1080p	5−6	18−20
QHD / 1440p	−	18−20
4K / 2160p	5−6	6−7
low / 720p	16−18	45−50
medium / 1080p	7−8	21−24
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in Far Cry 5 is 187% more, than FirePro V5900.
high / 1080p	7−8	27−30
ultra / 1080p	0−1	21−24
QHD / 1440p	0−1	14−16
low / 720p	55−60	110−120
medium / 1080p	18−20	60−65
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in Fortnite is 142% more, than FirePro V5900.
high / 1080p	10−11	27−30
ultra / 1080p	−	21−24
QHD / 1440p	−	10−11
4K / 2160p	8−9	−
low / 720p	21−24	60−65
medium / 1080p	12−14	30−35
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in Forza Horizon 4 is 173% more, than FirePro V5900.
low / 768p	50−55	90−95
medium / 768p	−	80−85
high / 1080p	10−11	30−35
ultra / 1080p	4−5	14−16
QHD / 1440p	−	4−5
medium / 720p	40−45	−
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in Grand Theft Auto V is 109% more, than FirePro V5900.
high / 1080p	3−4	10−12
ultra / 1080p	1−2	8−9
4K / 2160p	−	1−2
low / 720p	10−11	30−35
medium / 1080p	4−5	14−16
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in Metro Exodus is 220% more, than FirePro V5900.
low / 768p	90−95	110−120
ultra / 1080p	80−85	−
medium / 1080p	−	110−120
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in Minecraft is 25% more, than FirePro V5900.
high / 1080p	6−7	−
ultra / 1080p	2−3	14−16
4K / 2160p	0−1	−
low / 720p	27−30	60−65
medium / 1080p	9−10	18−20
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 146% more, than FirePro V5900.
high / 1080p	−	14−16
ultra / 1080p	−	9−10
QHD / 1440p	−	0−1
low / 720p	10−11	30−35
medium / 1080p	9−10	18−20
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 150% more, than FirePro V5900.
low / 768p	20−22	60−65
medium / 768p	12−14	35−40
high / 1080p	6−7	21−24
ultra / 1080p	4−5	12−14
4K / 2160p	3−4	7−8
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 211% more, than FirePro V5900.
low / 768p	75−80	90−95
medium / 768p	40−45	60−65
ultra / 1080p	18−20	35−40
high / 768p	30−35	55−60
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in World of Tanks is 47% more, than FirePro V5900.

Full Specs

	FirePro V5900	Tesla C2075
Architecture	TeraScale 3	Fermi 2.0
Code name	Cayman	GF110
Type	Workstation	Workstation
Release date	24 May 2011	25 July 2011
Pipelines	512	448
Core clock speed	600 MHz	574 MHz
Transistor count	2,640 million	3,000 million
Manufacturing process technology	40 nm	40 nm
Texture fill rate	19.20	32.14
Floating-point performance	614.4 gflops	1,030.4 gflops
Length	230 mm	248 mm
Memory bus width	256 Bit	384 Bit
Memory clock speed	2000 MHz	3132 MHz
Memory bandwidth	64 GB/s	150.3 GB/s
DirectX	11.2 (11_0)	12 (11_0)
Shader Model	5.0	5.1
OpenGL	4.4	4.6
OpenCL	1.2	1.1
Vulkan	N/A	N/A
CUDA		2.0
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)	66 Mh/s	94 Mh/s
	Check Price	Check Price

FirePro V5900 vs Tesla C2075

Main Specs

Game benchmarks

Full Specs

Similar compares