FirePro V5900 vs UHD Graphics 620

In this comparison between FirePro V5900 and UHD Graphics 620 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people FirePro V5900 will be the best choice, for others UHD Graphics 620 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.

FirePro V5900 Check Price

UHD Graphics 620 Check Price

UHD Graphics 620 is a Laptop Graphics Card

Note: UHD Graphics 620 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with UHD Graphics 620 here:

UHD Graphics 620 Laptops

Main Specs

	FirePro V5900	UHD Graphics 620
Power consumption (TDP)	75 Watt	15 Watt
Interface	PCIe 2.0 x16	PCIe 3.0 x1
Supplementary power connectors	None
Memory type	GDDR5	LPDDR3/DDR4
Maximum RAM amount	2 GB	32 GB
Display Connectors	1x DVI	No outputs
	Check Price	Check Price

FirePro V5900 has 400% more power consumption, than UHD Graphics 620.
FirePro V5900 is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and UHD Graphics 620 uses PCIe 3.0 x1 interface.
UHD Graphics 620 has 30 GB more memory, than FirePro V5900.
FirePro V5900 is used in Desktops, and UHD Graphics 620 - in Laptops.
FirePro V5900 is build with TeraScale 3 architecture, and UHD Graphics 620 - with Gen. 9.5.
Core clock speed of FirePro V5900 is 300 MHz higher, than UHD Graphics 620.
FirePro V5900 is manufactured by 40 nm process technology, and UHD Graphics 620 - by 14 nm process technology.

Game benchmarks


high / 1080p	4−5	2−3
ultra / 1080p	2−3	0−1
QHD / 1440p	1−2	0−1
low / 720p	14−16	12−14
medium / 1080p	7−8	3−4
The average gaming FPS of FirePro V5900 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 50% more, than UHD Graphics 620.
high / 1080p	10−11	6−7
ultra / 1080p	8−9	4−5
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
low / 720p	21−24	16−18
medium / 1080p	10−12	6−7
The average gaming FPS of FirePro V5900 in Battlefield 5 is 62% more, than UHD Graphics 620.
low / 768p	45−50	45−50
high / 1080p	40−45	40−45
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
FirePro V5900 and UHD Graphics 620 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone.
low / 768p	130−140	100−110
medium / 768p	100−110	80−85
ultra / 1080p	50−55	40−45
QHD / 1440p	24−27	21−24
4K / 2160p	12−14	16−18
high / 768p	75−80	60−65
The average gaming FPS of FirePro V5900 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 23% more, than UHD Graphics 620.
low / 768p	50−55	85−90
ultra / 1080p	18−20	18−20
medium / 1080p	45−50	40−45
The average gaming FPS of UHD Graphics 620 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 25% more, than FirePro V5900.
low / 768p	80−85	80−85
medium / 768p	55−60	55−60
ultra / 1080p	30−35	27−30
The average gaming FPS of FirePro V5900 in Dota 2 is 1% more, than UHD Graphics 620.
high / 1080p	6−7	2−3
ultra / 1080p	5−6	2−3
4K / 2160p	5−6	1−2
low / 720p	16−18	12−14
medium / 1080p	7−8	3−4
The average gaming FPS of FirePro V5900 in Far Cry 5 is 100% more, than UHD Graphics 620.
high / 1080p	7−8	10−11
ultra / 1080p	0−1	5−6
QHD / 1440p	0−1	1−2
low / 720p	55−60	50−55
medium / 1080p	18−20	12−14
The average gaming FPS of FirePro V5900 in Fortnite is 12% more, than UHD Graphics 620.
high / 1080p	10−11	5−6
QHD / 1440p	−	3−4
4K / 2160p	8−9	2−3
low / 720p	21−24	16−18
medium / 1080p	12−14	8−9
The average gaming FPS of FirePro V5900 in Forza Horizon 4 is 62% more, than UHD Graphics 620.
low / 768p	50−55	40−45
medium / 768p	−	35−40
high / 1080p	10−11	5−6
ultra / 1080p	4−5	3−4
QHD / 1440p	−	0−1
medium / 720p	40−45	−
The average gaming FPS of FirePro V5900 in Grand Theft Auto V is 29% more, than UHD Graphics 620.
high / 1080p	3−4	1−2
ultra / 1080p	1−2	0−1
low / 720p	10−11	5−6
medium / 1080p	4−5	3−4
The average gaming FPS of FirePro V5900 in Metro Exodus is 100% more, than UHD Graphics 620.
low / 768p	90−95	95−100
high / 1080p	−	60−65
ultra / 1080p	80−85	−
medium / 1080p	−	85−90
The average gaming FPS of UHD Graphics 620 in Minecraft is 5% more, than FirePro V5900.
high / 1080p	6−7	−
ultra / 1080p	2−3	12−14
4K / 2160p	0−1	−
low / 720p	27−30	27−30
medium / 1080p	9−10	14−16
The average gaming FPS of UHD Graphics 620 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 38% more, than FirePro V5900.
ultra / 1080p	−	4−5
QHD / 1440p	−	0−1
low / 720p	10−11	4−5
medium / 1080p	9−10	−
The average gaming FPS of FirePro V5900 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 150% more, than UHD Graphics 620.
low / 768p	20−22	12−14
medium / 768p	12−14	9−10
high / 1080p	6−7	4−5
ultra / 1080p	4−5	3−4
4K / 2160p	3−4	0−1
The average gaming FPS of FirePro V5900 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 57% more, than UHD Graphics 620.
low / 768p	75−80	65−70
medium / 768p	40−45	35−40
ultra / 1080p	18−20	14−16
high / 768p	30−35	27−30
The average gaming FPS of FirePro V5900 in World of Tanks is 13% more, than UHD Graphics 620.

Full Specs

	FirePro V5900	UHD Graphics 620
Architecture	TeraScale 3	Gen. 9.5
Code name	Cayman	Kaby-Lake-Refresh GT2
Type	Workstation	Laptop
Release date	24 May 2011	1 September 2017
Pipelines	512	24
Core clock speed	600 MHz	300 MHz
Boost Clock		1150 MHz
Transistor count	2,640 million	189 million
Manufacturing process technology	40 nm	14 nm
Texture fill rate	19.20	27.60
Floating-point performance	614.4 gflops
Length	230 mm
Memory bus width	256 Bit	64/128 Bit
Memory clock speed	2000 MHz
Memory bandwidth	64 GB/s
Shared memory		+
DirectX	11.2 (11_0)	12 (12_1)
Shader Model	5.0	6.4
OpenGL	4.4	4.6
OpenCL	1.2	2.1
Vulkan	N/A	1.1.103
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)	66 Mh/s
Quick Sync		+
	Check Price	Check Price

FirePro V5900 vs UHD Graphics 620

UHD Graphics 620 is a Laptop Graphics Card

Main Specs

Game benchmarks

Full Specs

Similar compares