FirePro V7900 vs GeForce GTS 160M

Find out if it is worth upgrading your current GPU setup by comparing FirePro V7900 and GeForce GTS 160M. Here you can take a closer look at graphics cards specs, such as core clock speed, memory type and size, display connectors, etc. The price, overall benchmark and gaming performances are usually defining factors when it comes to choosing between FirePro V7900 and GeForce GTS 160M. Make sure that the graphics card has compatible dimensions and will properly fit in your new or current computer case. Also these graphics cards may have different system power recommendations, so take that into consideration and upgrade your PSU if necessary.

FirePro V7900 Check Price

GeForce GTS 160M Check Price

GeForce GTS 160M is a Laptop Graphics Card

Note: GeForce GTS 160M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce GTS 160M here:

GeForce GTS 160M Laptops

Main Specs

	FirePro V7900	GeForce GTS 160M
Power consumption (TDP)	151 Watt	60 Watt
Interface	PCIe 2.0 x16	PCIe 2.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors	1x 6-pin
Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR3
Maximum RAM amount	2 GB	1 GB
Display Connectors	4x DisplayPort	No outputs
	Check Price	Check Price

FirePro V7900 has 151% more power consumption, than GeForce GTS 160M.
Both video cards are using PCIe 2.0 x16 interface connection to a motherboard.
FirePro V7900 has 1 GB more memory, than GeForce GTS 160M.
FirePro V7900 is used in Desktops, and GeForce GTS 160M - in Laptops.
FirePro V7900 is build with TeraScale 3 architecture, and GeForce GTS 160M - with G9x.
Core clock speed of GeForce GTS 160M is 775 MHz higher, than FirePro V7900.
FirePro V7900 is manufactured by 40 nm process technology, and GeForce GTS 160M - by 55 nm process technology.

Game benchmarks


high / 1080p	10−12	0−1
ultra / 1080p	6−7	−
QHD / 1440p	1−2	0−1
low / 720p	24−27	1−2
medium / 1080p	14−16	0−1
The average gaming FPS of FirePro V7900 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 2400% more, than GeForce GTS 160M.
high / 1080p	18−20	−
ultra / 1080p	14−16	−
QHD / 1440p	1−2	0−1
low / 720p	35−40	0−1
medium / 1080p	20−22	−
low / 768p	45−50	50−55
high / 1080p	−	45−50
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTS 160M in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than FirePro V7900.
low / 768p	180−190	60−65
medium / 768p	150−160	27−30
ultra / 1080p	75−80	7−8
QHD / 1440p	45−50	−
4K / 2160p	30−33	−
high / 768p	110−120	16−18
The average gaming FPS of FirePro V7900 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 375% more, than GeForce GTS 160M.
low / 768p	55−60	70−75
ultra / 1080p	30−33	0−1
medium / 1080p	45−50	45−50
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTS 160M in Cyberpunk 2077 is 15% more, than FirePro V7900.
low / 768p	95−100	45−50
medium / 768p	80−85	10−11
ultra / 1080p	50−55	0−1
The average gaming FPS of FirePro V7900 in Dota 2 is 210% more, than GeForce GTS 160M.
high / 1080p	12−14	−
ultra / 1080p	12−14	−
4K / 2160p	5−6	−
low / 720p	30−33	0−1
medium / 1080p	14−16	−
high / 1080p	20−22	−
ultra / 1080p	14−16	−
low / 720p	80−85	21−24
medium / 1080p	35−40	0−1
The average gaming FPS of FirePro V7900 in Fortnite is 272% more, than GeForce GTS 160M.
high / 1080p	18−20	0−1
ultra / 1080p	14−16	−
QHD / 1440p	5−6	0−1
low / 720p	40−45	0−1
medium / 1080p	21−24	0−1
low / 768p	70−75	18−20
medium / 768p	60−65	−
high / 1080p	21−24	0−1
ultra / 1080p	9−10	−
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
medium / 720p	−	12−14
The average gaming FPS of FirePro V7900 in Grand Theft Auto V is 278% more, than GeForce GTS 160M.
high / 1080p	7−8	−
ultra / 1080p	5−6	−
4K / 2160p	1−2	−
low / 720p	21−24	0−1
medium / 1080p	9−10	−
low / 768p	100−110	75−80
high / 1080p	−	27−30
ultra / 1080p	90−95	−
medium / 1080p	100−105	−
The average gaming FPS of FirePro V7900 in Minecraft is 36% more, than GeForce GTS 160M.
high / 1080p	20−22	−
ultra / 1080p	16−18	−
low / 720p	45−50	8−9
medium / 1080p	21−24	−
The average gaming FPS of FirePro V7900 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 487% more, than GeForce GTS 160M.
high / 1080p	12−14	−
ultra / 1080p	8−9	−
QHD / 1440p	0−1	−
low / 720p	21−24	0−1
medium / 1080p	12−14	−
low / 768p	40−45	0−1
medium / 768p	24−27	−
high / 1080p	14−16	−
ultra / 1080p	8−9	−
4K / 2160p	7−8	−
low / 768p	95−100	45−50
medium / 768p	55−60	14−16
ultra / 1080p	27−30	0−1
high / 768p	45−50	12−14
The average gaming FPS of FirePro V7900 in World of Tanks is 168% more, than GeForce GTS 160M.

Full Specs

	FirePro V7900	GeForce GTS 160M
Architecture	TeraScale 3	G9x
Code name	Cayman	N10E-GS1
Type	Workstation	Laptop
Release date	24 May 2011	2 March 2009
Pipelines	1280	64
Core clock speed	725 MHz	1500 MHz
Transistor count	2,640 million	505 million
Manufacturing process technology	40 nm	55 nm
Texture fill rate	58.00	19 billion/sec
Floating-point performance	1,856.0 gflops	192 gflops
Length	279 mm
Memory bus width	256 Bit	256 Bit
Memory clock speed	5000 MHz
Memory bandwidth	160 GB/s	51 GB/s
Shared memory		-
DirectX	11.2 (11_0)	11.1 (10_0)
Shader Model	5.0	4.0
OpenGL	4.4	2.1
OpenCL	1.2	1.1
Vulkan	N/A	N/A
CUDA		+
CUDA cores		64
Bus support	PCIe 2.1 x16	PCI-E 2.0
SLI options		2-way
HDMI		+
Maximum VGA resolution		2048x1536
Audio input for HDMI		S/PDIF
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)	171 Mh/s
Laptop size		large
Form factor	full height / full length
StereoOutput3D	+
DisplayPort count	4
Dual-link DVI support	+
Gigaflops		288
MXM Type		MXM 3.0 Type-B
Power management		8.0
	Check Price	Check Price

FirePro V7900 vs GeForce GTS 160M

GeForce GTS 160M is a Laptop Graphics Card

Main Specs

Game benchmarks

Full Specs

Similar compares