FirePro V7900 vs GRID M60 1Q

When choosing between FirePro V7900 and GRID M60 1Q, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between FirePro V7900 and GRID M60 1Q.

FirePro V7900 Check Price

GRID M60 1Q

Main Specs

	FirePro V7900	GRID M60 1Q
Power consumption (TDP)	151 Watt	225 Watt
Interface	PCIe 2.0 x16	PCIe 3.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors	1x 6-pin	1x 8-pin
Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount	2 GB	1 GB
Display Connectors	4x DisplayPort	No outputs
	Check Price

GRID M60 1Q has 49% more power consumption, than FirePro V7900.
FirePro V7900 is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and GRID M60 1Q uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
FirePro V7900 has 1 GB more memory, than GRID M60 1Q.
Both cards are used in Desktops.
FirePro V7900 is build with TeraScale 3 architecture, and GRID M60 1Q - with Maxwell 2.0.
Core clock speed of FirePro V7900 is 168 MHz higher, than GRID M60 1Q.
FirePro V7900 is manufactured by 40 nm process technology, and GRID M60 1Q - by 28 nm process technology.
FirePro V7900 is 12 mm longer, than GRID M60 1Q.
Memory clock speed of GRID M60 1Q is 12 MHz higher, than FirePro V7900.

Game benchmarks


high / 1080p	10−12	21−24
ultra / 1080p	6−7	12−14
QHD / 1440p	1−2	7−8
4K / 2160p	−	5−6
low / 720p	24−27	40−45
medium / 1080p	14−16	27−30
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 1Q in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 100% more, than FirePro V7900.
high / 1080p	18−20	35−40
ultra / 1080p	14−16	30−33
QHD / 1440p	1−2	14−16
4K / 2160p	−	9−10
low / 720p	35−40	70−75
medium / 1080p	20−22	35−40
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 1Q in Battlefield 5 is 111% more, than FirePro V7900.
low / 768p	45−50	50−55
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 1Q in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than FirePro V7900.
low / 768p	180−190	230−240
medium / 768p	150−160	200−210
ultra / 1080p	75−80	120−130
QHD / 1440p	45−50	100−105
4K / 2160p	30−33	55−60
high / 768p	110−120	170−180
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 1Q in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 48% more, than FirePro V7900.
low / 768p	55−60	60−65
ultra / 1080p	30−33	50−55
medium / 1080p	45−50	55−60
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 1Q in Cyberpunk 2077 is 26% more, than FirePro V7900.
low / 768p	95−100	120−130
medium / 768p	80−85	110−120
ultra / 1080p	50−55	80−85
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 1Q in Dota 2 is 38% more, than FirePro V7900.
high / 1080p	12−14	27−30
ultra / 1080p	12−14	24−27
QHD / 1440p	−	20−22
4K / 2160p	5−6	8−9
low / 720p	30−33	55−60
medium / 1080p	14−16	27−30
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 1Q in Far Cry 5 is 93% more, than FirePro V7900.
high / 1080p	20−22	35−40
ultra / 1080p	14−16	27−30
QHD / 1440p	−	16−18
low / 720p	80−85	130−140
medium / 1080p	35−40	75−80
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 1Q in Fortnite is 76% more, than FirePro V7900.
high / 1080p	18−20	35−40
ultra / 1080p	14−16	27−30
QHD / 1440p	5−6	16−18
4K / 2160p	−	14−16
low / 720p	40−45	70−75
medium / 1080p	21−24	40−45
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 1Q in Forza Horizon 4 is 95% more, than FirePro V7900.
low / 768p	70−75	100−110
medium / 768p	60−65	95−100
high / 1080p	21−24	40−45
ultra / 1080p	9−10	18−20
QHD / 1440p	0−1	8−9
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 1Q in Grand Theft Auto V is 60% more, than FirePro V7900.
high / 1080p	7−8	14−16
ultra / 1080p	5−6	10−12
QHD / 1440p	−	10−12
4K / 2160p	1−2	3−4
low / 720p	21−24	40−45
medium / 1080p	9−10	18−20
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 1Q in Metro Exodus is 100% more, than FirePro V7900.
low / 768p	100−110	120−130
ultra / 1080p	90−95	−
medium / 1080p	100−105	110−120
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 1Q in Minecraft is 16% more, than FirePro V7900.
high / 1080p	20−22	−
ultra / 1080p	16−18	14−16
low / 720p	45−50	75−80
medium / 1080p	21−24	18−20
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 1Q in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 27% more, than FirePro V7900.
high / 1080p	12−14	16−18
ultra / 1080p	8−9	10−12
QHD / 1440p	0−1	2−3
4K / 2160p	−	2−3
low / 720p	21−24	40−45
medium / 1080p	12−14	21−24
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 1Q in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 64% more, than FirePro V7900.
low / 768p	40−45	80−85
medium / 768p	24−27	50−55
high / 1080p	14−16	27−30
ultra / 1080p	8−9	14−16
4K / 2160p	7−8	9−10
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 1Q in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 94% more, than FirePro V7900.
low / 768p	95−100	90−95
medium / 768p	55−60	60−65
ultra / 1080p	27−30	40−45
high / 768p	45−50	55−60
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 1Q in World of Tanks is 10% more, than FirePro V7900.

Full Specs

	FirePro V7900	GRID M60 1Q
Architecture	TeraScale 3	Maxwell 2.0
Code name	Cayman	GM204
Type	Workstation	Workstation
Release date	24 May 2011	30 August 2015
Pipelines	1280	2048
Core clock speed	725 MHz	557 MHz
Boost Clock		1178 MHz
Transistor count	2,640 million	5,200 million
Manufacturing process technology	40 nm	28 nm
Texture fill rate	58.00	150.8
Floating-point performance	1,856.0 gflops	4,833 gflops
Length	279 mm	267 mm
Memory bus width	256 Bit	256 Bit
Memory clock speed	5000 MHz	5012 MHz
Memory bandwidth	160 GB/s	160.4 GB/s
DirectX	11.2 (11_0)	12 (12_1)
Shader Model	5.0	6.4
OpenGL	4.4	4.6
OpenCL	1.2	1.2
Vulkan	N/A	1.1.126
CUDA		5.2
Bus support	PCIe 2.1 x16
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)	171 Mh/s
Form factor	full height / full length
StereoOutput3D	+
DisplayPort count	4
Dual-link DVI support	+
	Check Price

FirePro V7900 vs GRID M60 1Q

Main Specs

Game benchmarks

Full Specs

Similar compares