FirePro V7900 vs Iris Xe Graphics G7
When comparing FirePro V7900 and Iris Xe Graphics G7, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between FirePro V7900 and Iris Xe Graphics G7 is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
Iris Xe Graphics G7 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Iris Xe Graphics G7 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Iris Xe Graphics G7 here:
Main Specs
FirePro V7900
Iris Xe Graphics G7
Power consumption (TDP)
151 Watt
Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors
1x 6-pin
Memory type
GDDR5
DDR4
Maximum RAM amount
2 GB
Display Connectors
4x DisplayPort
Check Price
Check Price
FirePro V7900 is used in Desktops, and Iris Xe Graphics G7 - in Laptops.
FirePro V7900 is build with TeraScale 3 architecture, and Iris Xe Graphics G7 - with Gen. 11 Ice Lake.
FirePro V7900 is manufactured by 40 nm process technology, and Iris Xe Graphics G7 - by 10 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Battlefield 5
Call of Duty: Warzone
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Cyberpunk 2077
Dota 2
Far Cry 5
Fortnite
Forza Horizon 4
Grand Theft Auto V
Metro Exodus
Minecraft
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS
Red Dead Redemption 2
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
World of Tanks
high / 1080p
10−12
16−18
ultra / 1080p
6−7
9−10
QHD / 1440p
1−2
3−4
low / 720p
24−27
30−35
medium / 1080p
14−16
20−22
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 45% more, than FirePro V7900.
high / 1080p
18−20
24−27
ultra / 1080p
14−16
21−24
QHD / 1440p
1−2
5−6
low / 720p
35−40
55−60
medium / 1080p
20−22
27−30
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 in Battlefield 5 is 50% more, than FirePro V7900.
low / 768p
45−50
50−55
high / 1080p
−
45−50
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than FirePro V7900.
low / 768p
180−190
210−220
medium / 768p
150−160
180−190
ultra / 1080p
75−80
100−110
QHD / 1440p
45−50
55−60
4K / 2160p
30−33
30−33
high / 768p
110−120
140−150
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 21% more, than FirePro V7900.
low / 768p
55−60
60−65
ultra / 1080p
30−33
40−45
medium / 1080p
45−50
55−60
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 20% more, than FirePro V7900.
low / 768p
95−100
110−120
medium / 768p
80−85
95−100
ultra / 1080p
50−55
65−70
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 in Dota 2 is 20% more, than FirePro V7900.
high / 1080p
12−14
18−20
ultra / 1080p
12−14
18−20
QHD / 1440p
−
16−18
4K / 2160p
5−6
6−7
low / 720p
30−33
40−45
medium / 1080p
14−16
21−24
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 in Far Cry 5 is 40% more, than FirePro V7900.
high / 1080p
20−22
24−27
ultra / 1080p
14−16
20−22
QHD / 1440p
−
12−14
low / 720p
80−85
100−110
medium / 1080p
35−40
55−60
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 in Fortnite is 33% more, than FirePro V7900.
high / 1080p
18−20
27−30
ultra / 1080p
14−16
21−24
QHD / 1440p
5−6
9−10
low / 720p
40−45
55−60
medium / 1080p
21−24
30−35
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 in Forza Horizon 4 is 50% more, than FirePro V7900.
low / 768p
70−75
90−95
medium / 768p
60−65
80−85
high / 1080p
21−24
30−35
ultra / 1080p
9−10
12−14
QHD / 1440p
0−1
3−4
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 in Grand Theft Auto V is 34% more, than FirePro V7900.
high / 1080p
7−8
10−11
ultra / 1080p
5−6
8−9
4K / 2160p
1−2
1−2
low / 720p
21−24
30−35
medium / 1080p
9−10
14−16
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 in Metro Exodus is 44% more, than FirePro V7900.
low / 768p
100−110
110−120
ultra / 1080p
90−95
−
medium / 1080p
100−105
110−120
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 in Minecraft is 11% more, than FirePro V7900.
high / 1080p
20−22
−
ultra / 1080p
16−18
14−16
low / 720p
45−50
60−65
medium / 1080p
21−24
18−20
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 10% more, than FirePro V7900.
high / 1080p
12−14
12−14
ultra / 1080p
8−9
8−9
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
low / 720p
21−24
30−35
medium / 1080p
12−14
16−18
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 21% more, than FirePro V7900.
low / 768p
40−45
55−60
medium / 768p
24−27
35−40
high / 1080p
14−16
20−22
ultra / 1080p
8−9
10−12
4K / 2160p
7−8
6−7
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 36% more, than FirePro V7900.
low / 768p
95−100
90−95
medium / 768p
55−60
60−65
ultra / 1080p
27−30
35−40
high / 768p
45−50
50−55
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 in World of Tanks is 7% more, than FirePro V7900.
Full Specs
FirePro V7900
Iris Xe Graphics G7
Architecture
TeraScale 3
Gen. 11 Ice Lake
Code name
Cayman
Tiger Lake Xe
Type
Workstation
Laptop
Release date
24 May 2011
15 August 2020
Pipelines
1280
96
Core clock speed
725 MHz
Transistor count
2,640 million
Manufacturing process technology
40 nm
10 nm
Texture fill rate
58.00
Floating-point performance
1,856.0 gflops
Length
279 mm
Memory bus width
256 Bit
Memory clock speed
5000 MHz
Memory bandwidth
160 GB/s
Shared memory
+
DirectX
11.2 (11_0)
DirectX 12_1
Shader Model
5.0
OpenGL
4.4
OpenCL
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
Bus support
PCIe 2.1 x16
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)
171 Mh/s
Quick Sync
+
Form factor
full height / full length
StereoOutput3D
+
DisplayPort count
4
Dual-link DVI support
+
Check Price
Check Price
