FirePro V7900 vs NVS 810

If you are going to buy a new graphics card and are choosing between FirePro V7900 and NVS 810, there are a couple of things to consider. Cards with more VRAM in general perform better and allow you to play on higher graphics settings. Size also makes a difference. A model with a large heatsink can occupy up to three expansion slots on a motherboard. Be sure you have enough room in your PC case. When comparing GPUs with different architectures, more processing cores and even higher TFLOPS will not always translate to better performance. To help you decide which GPU you need, we have measured frame rates in a number of popular games. For more on how the FirePro V7900 stacks up against NVS 810, check out specs charts below.

FirePro V7900 Check Price

NVS 810 Check Price

Main Specs

	FirePro V7900	NVS 810
Power consumption (TDP)	151 Watt	68 Watt
Interface	PCIe 2.0 x16	PCIe 3.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors	1x 6-pin	None
Memory type	GDDR5	DDR3
Maximum RAM amount	2 GB	2 GB
Display Connectors	4x DisplayPort	8x mini-DisplayPort
	Check Price	Check Price

FirePro V7900 has 122% more power consumption, than NVS 810.
FirePro V7900 is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and NVS 810 uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
FirePro V7900 and NVS 810 have maximum RAM of 2 GB.
Both cards are used in Desktops.
FirePro V7900 is build with TeraScale 3 architecture, and NVS 810 - with Maxwell.
Core clock speed of NVS 810 is 177 MHz higher, than FirePro V7900.
FirePro V7900 is manufactured by 40 nm process technology, and NVS 810 - by 28 nm process technology.
FirePro V7900 is 81 mm longer, than NVS 810.
Memory clock speed of FirePro V7900 is 3200 MHz higher, than NVS 810.

Game benchmarks


high / 1080p	10−12	2−3
ultra / 1080p	6−7	1−2
QHD / 1440p	1−2	0−1
low / 720p	24−27	12−14
medium / 1080p	14−16	4−5
The average gaming FPS of FirePro V7900 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 180% more, than NVS 810.
high / 1080p	18−20	−
ultra / 1080p	14−16	5−6
QHD / 1440p	1−2	0−1
low / 720p	35−40	16−18
medium / 1080p	20−22	6−7
The average gaming FPS of FirePro V7900 in Battlefield 5 is 166% more, than NVS 810.
low / 768p	45−50	50−55
high / 1080p	−	40−45
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
The average gaming FPS of NVS 810 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than FirePro V7900.
low / 768p	180−190	120−130
medium / 768p	150−160	95−100
ultra / 1080p	75−80	40−45
QHD / 1440p	45−50	21−24
4K / 2160p	30−33	16−18
high / 768p	110−120	65−70
The average gaming FPS of FirePro V7900 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 62% more, than NVS 810.
low / 768p	55−60	65−70
ultra / 1080p	30−33	20−22
medium / 1080p	45−50	45−50
FirePro V7900 and NVS 810 have the same average FPS in Cyberpunk 2077.
low / 768p	95−100	80−85
medium / 768p	80−85	45−50
ultra / 1080p	50−55	21−24
The average gaming FPS of FirePro V7900 in Dota 2 is 54% more, than NVS 810.
high / 1080p	12−14	2−3
ultra / 1080p	12−14	2−3
4K / 2160p	5−6	2−3
low / 720p	30−33	10−12
medium / 1080p	14−16	4−5
The average gaming FPS of FirePro V7900 in Far Cry 5 is 275% more, than NVS 810.
high / 1080p	20−22	10−11
ultra / 1080p	14−16	5−6
QHD / 1440p	−	4−5
low / 720p	80−85	50−55
medium / 1080p	35−40	10−12
The average gaming FPS of FirePro V7900 in Fortnite is 105% more, than NVS 810.
high / 1080p	18−20	5−6
ultra / 1080p	14−16	−
QHD / 1440p	5−6	3−4
4K / 2160p	−	2−3
low / 720p	40−45	18−20
medium / 1080p	21−24	8−9
The average gaming FPS of FirePro V7900 in Forza Horizon 4 is 144% more, than NVS 810.
low / 768p	70−75	45−50
medium / 768p	60−65	−
high / 1080p	21−24	4−5
ultra / 1080p	9−10	2−3
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
medium / 720p	−	35−40
The average gaming FPS of FirePro V7900 in Grand Theft Auto V is 88% more, than NVS 810.
high / 1080p	7−8	2−3
ultra / 1080p	5−6	0−1
4K / 2160p	1−2	0−1
low / 720p	21−24	4−5
medium / 1080p	9−10	3−4
The average gaming FPS of FirePro V7900 in Metro Exodus is 333% more, than NVS 810.
low / 768p	100−110	90−95
high / 1080p	−	80−85
ultra / 1080p	90−95	70−75
medium / 1080p	100−105	85−90
The average gaming FPS of FirePro V7900 in Minecraft is 19% more, than NVS 810.
high / 1080p	20−22	−
ultra / 1080p	16−18	12−14
low / 720p	45−50	27−30
medium / 1080p	21−24	14−16
The average gaming FPS of FirePro V7900 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 61% more, than NVS 810.
high / 1080p	12−14	−
ultra / 1080p	8−9	−
QHD / 1440p	0−1	−
low / 720p	21−24	6−7
medium / 1080p	12−14	−
The average gaming FPS of FirePro V7900 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 266% more, than NVS 810.
low / 768p	40−45	10−11
medium / 768p	24−27	8−9
high / 1080p	14−16	4−5
ultra / 1080p	8−9	4−5
4K / 2160p	7−8	1−2
The average gaming FPS of FirePro V7900 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 280% more, than NVS 810.
low / 768p	95−100	70−75
medium / 768p	55−60	35−40
ultra / 1080p	27−30	14−16
high / 768p	45−50	30−35
The average gaming FPS of FirePro V7900 in World of Tanks is 46% more, than NVS 810.

Full Specs

	FirePro V7900	NVS 810
Architecture	TeraScale 3	Maxwell
Code name	Cayman	GM107
Type	Workstation	Workstation
Release date	24 May 2011	4 November 2015
Pipelines	1280	512
Core clock speed	725 MHz	902 MHz
Boost Clock		1033 MHz
Transistor count	2,640 million	1,870 million
Manufacturing process technology	40 nm	28 nm
Texture fill rate	58.00	33.06
Floating-point performance	1,856.0 gflops	2x 1,058 gflops
Length	279 mm	198 mm
Memory bus width	256 Bit	64 Bit
Memory clock speed	5000 MHz	1800 MHz
Memory bandwidth	160 GB/s	14.4 GB/s
DirectX	11.2 (11_0)	12 (11_0)
Shader Model	5.0	5.1
OpenGL	4.4	4.6
OpenCL	1.2	1.2
Vulkan	N/A	1.1.126
CUDA		5.0
Bus support	PCIe 2.1 x16
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)	171 Mh/s
Form factor	full height / full length
StereoOutput3D	+
DisplayPort count	4
Dual-link DVI support	+
	Check Price	Check Price

FirePro V7900 vs NVS 810

Main Specs

Game benchmarks

Full Specs

Similar compares