FirePro V7900 vs Quadro K1000M

In this comparison between FirePro V7900 and Quadro K1000M you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people FirePro V7900 will be the best choice, for others Quadro K1000M will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.

FirePro V7900 Check Price

Quadro K1000M Check Price

Quadro K1000M is a Laptop Graphics Card

Note: Quadro K1000M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro K1000M here:

Quadro K1000M Laptops

Main Specs

	FirePro V7900	Quadro K1000M
Power consumption (TDP)	151 Watt	45 Watt
Interface	PCIe 2.0 x16	MXM-A (3.0)
Supplementary power connectors	1x 6-pin
Memory type	GDDR5	DDR3
Maximum RAM amount	2 GB	2 GB
Display Connectors	4x DisplayPort	No outputs
	Check Price	Check Price

FirePro V7900 has 235% more power consumption, than Quadro K1000M.
FirePro V7900 is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and Quadro K1000M uses MXM-A (3.0) interface.
FirePro V7900 and Quadro K1000M have maximum RAM of 2 GB.
FirePro V7900 is used in Desktops, and Quadro K1000M - in Mobile workstations.
FirePro V7900 is build with TeraScale 3 architecture, and Quadro K1000M - with Kepler.
Core clock speed of Quadro K1000M is 125 MHz higher, than FirePro V7900.
FirePro V7900 is manufactured by 40 nm process technology, and Quadro K1000M - by 28 nm process technology.
Memory clock speed of FirePro V7900 is 3200 MHz higher, than Quadro K1000M.

Game benchmarks


high / 1080p	10−12	0−1
ultra / 1080p	6−7	−
QHD / 1440p	1−2	0−1
low / 720p	24−27	1−2
medium / 1080p	14−16	0−1
The average gaming FPS of FirePro V7900 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 2400% more, than Quadro K1000M.
high / 1080p	18−20	−
ultra / 1080p	14−16	−
QHD / 1440p	1−2	0−1
low / 720p	35−40	0−1
medium / 1080p	20−22	−
low / 768p	45−50	50−55
high / 1080p	−	45−50
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K1000M in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than FirePro V7900.
low / 768p	180−190	60−65
medium / 768p	150−160	27−30
ultra / 1080p	75−80	7−8
QHD / 1440p	45−50	−
4K / 2160p	30−33	−
high / 768p	110−120	16−18
The average gaming FPS of FirePro V7900 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 375% more, than Quadro K1000M.
low / 768p	55−60	70−75
ultra / 1080p	30−33	0−1
medium / 1080p	45−50	45−50
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K1000M in Cyberpunk 2077 is 15% more, than FirePro V7900.
low / 768p	95−100	45−50
medium / 768p	80−85	10−11
ultra / 1080p	50−55	0−1
The average gaming FPS of FirePro V7900 in Dota 2 is 210% more, than Quadro K1000M.
high / 1080p	12−14	−
ultra / 1080p	12−14	−
4K / 2160p	5−6	−
low / 720p	30−33	0−1
medium / 1080p	14−16	−
high / 1080p	20−22	−
ultra / 1080p	14−16	−
low / 720p	80−85	21−24
medium / 1080p	35−40	0−1
The average gaming FPS of FirePro V7900 in Fortnite is 272% more, than Quadro K1000M.
high / 1080p	18−20	0−1
ultra / 1080p	14−16	−
QHD / 1440p	5−6	0−1
low / 720p	40−45	0−1
medium / 1080p	21−24	0−1
low / 768p	70−75	18−20
medium / 768p	60−65	−
high / 1080p	21−24	0−1
ultra / 1080p	9−10	−
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
medium / 720p	−	12−14
The average gaming FPS of FirePro V7900 in Grand Theft Auto V is 278% more, than Quadro K1000M.
high / 1080p	7−8	−
ultra / 1080p	5−6	−
4K / 2160p	1−2	−
low / 720p	21−24	0−1
medium / 1080p	9−10	−
low / 768p	100−110	75−80
high / 1080p	−	27−30
ultra / 1080p	90−95	−
medium / 1080p	100−105	−
The average gaming FPS of FirePro V7900 in Minecraft is 36% more, than Quadro K1000M.
high / 1080p	20−22	−
ultra / 1080p	16−18	−
low / 720p	45−50	8−9
medium / 1080p	21−24	−
The average gaming FPS of FirePro V7900 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 487% more, than Quadro K1000M.
high / 1080p	12−14	−
ultra / 1080p	8−9	−
QHD / 1440p	0−1	−
low / 720p	21−24	0−1
medium / 1080p	12−14	−
low / 768p	40−45	0−1
medium / 768p	24−27	−
high / 1080p	14−16	−
ultra / 1080p	8−9	−
4K / 2160p	7−8	−
low / 768p	95−100	45−50
medium / 768p	55−60	14−16
ultra / 1080p	27−30	0−1
high / 768p	45−50	12−14
The average gaming FPS of FirePro V7900 in World of Tanks is 168% more, than Quadro K1000M.

Full Specs

	FirePro V7900	Quadro K1000M
Architecture	TeraScale 3	Kepler
Code name	Cayman	N14P-Q1
Type	Workstation	Mobile workstation
Release date	24 May 2011	1 June 2012
Pipelines	1280	192
Core clock speed	725 MHz	850 MHz
Transistor count	2,640 million	1,270 million
Manufacturing process technology	40 nm	28 nm
Texture fill rate	58.00	13.60
Floating-point performance	1,856.0 gflops	326.4 gflops
Length	279 mm
Memory bus width	256 Bit	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	5000 MHz	1800 MHz
Memory bandwidth	160 GB/s	28.8 GB/s
Shared memory		-
DirectX	11.2 (11_0)	12 (11_0)
Shader Model	5.0	5.1
OpenGL	4.4	4.6
OpenCL	1.2	1.2
Vulkan	N/A	1.1.126
CUDA		+
Bus support	PCIe 2.1 x16
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)	171 Mh/s	10 Mh/s
Laptop size		medium sized
Optimus		+
Form factor	full height / full length
StereoOutput3D	+
DisplayPort count	4
Dual-link DVI support	+
	Check Price	Check Price

FirePro V7900 vs Quadro K1000M

Quadro K1000M is a Laptop Graphics Card

Main Specs

Game benchmarks

Full Specs

Similar compares