FirePro V7900 vs Quadro K2000M
When comparing FirePro V7900 and Quadro K2000M, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between FirePro V7900 and Quadro K2000M is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
Quadro K2000M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Quadro K2000M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro K2000M here:
Main Specs
FirePro V7900
Quadro K2000M
Power consumption (TDP)
151 Watt
55 Watt
Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
MXM-A (3.0)
Supplementary power connectors
1x 6-pin
Memory type
GDDR5
DDR3
Maximum RAM amount
2 GB
2 GB
Display Connectors
4x DisplayPort
No outputs
Check Price
Check Price
FirePro V7900 has 174% more power consumption, than Quadro K2000M.
FirePro V7900 is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and Quadro K2000M uses MXM-A (3.0) interface.
FirePro V7900 and Quadro K2000M have maximum RAM of 2 GB.
FirePro V7900 is used in Desktops, and Quadro K2000M - in Mobile workstations.
FirePro V7900 is build with TeraScale 3 architecture, and Quadro K2000M - with Kepler.
Core clock speed of Quadro K2000M is 20 MHz higher, than FirePro V7900.
FirePro V7900 is manufactured by 40 nm process technology, and Quadro K2000M - by 28 nm process technology.
Memory clock speed of FirePro V7900 is 3200 MHz higher, than Quadro K2000M.
Game benchmarks
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Battlefield 5
Call of Duty: Warzone
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Cyberpunk 2077
Dota 2
Far Cry 5
Fortnite
Forza Horizon 4
Grand Theft Auto V
Metro Exodus
Minecraft
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS
Red Dead Redemption 2
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
World of Tanks
high / 1080p
10−12
1−2
ultra / 1080p
6−7
0−1
QHD / 1440p
1−2
0−1
low / 720p
24−27
12−14
medium / 1080p
14−16
3−4
The average gaming FPS of FirePro V7900 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 183% more, than Quadro K2000M.
high / 1080p
18−20
−
ultra / 1080p
14−16
4−5
QHD / 1440p
1−2
0−1
low / 720p
35−40
16−18
medium / 1080p
20−22
5−6
The average gaming FPS of FirePro V7900 in Battlefield 5 is 166% more, than Quadro K2000M.
low / 768p
45−50
50−55
high / 1080p
−
40−45
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
medium / 1080p
−
50−55
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2000M in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than FirePro V7900.
low / 768p
180−190
120−130
medium / 768p
150−160
90−95
ultra / 1080p
75−80
40−45
QHD / 1440p
45−50
21−24
4K / 2160p
30−33
18−20
high / 768p
110−120
65−70
The average gaming FPS of FirePro V7900 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 65% more, than Quadro K2000M.
low / 768p
55−60
70−75
ultra / 1080p
30−33
16−18
medium / 1080p
45−50
50−55
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2000M in Cyberpunk 2077 is 4% more, than FirePro V7900.
low / 768p
95−100
70−75
medium / 768p
80−85
45−50
ultra / 1080p
50−55
21−24
The average gaming FPS of FirePro V7900 in Dota 2 is 63% more, than Quadro K2000M.
high / 1080p
12−14
2−3
ultra / 1080p
12−14
2−3
4K / 2160p
5−6
0−1
low / 720p
30−33
10−12
medium / 1080p
14−16
3−4
The average gaming FPS of FirePro V7900 in Far Cry 5 is 350% more, than Quadro K2000M.
high / 1080p
20−22
10−11
ultra / 1080p
14−16
5−6
QHD / 1440p
−
2−3
low / 720p
80−85
50−55
medium / 1080p
35−40
10−12
The average gaming FPS of FirePro V7900 in Fortnite is 105% more, than Quadro K2000M.
high / 1080p
18−20
5−6
ultra / 1080p
14−16
5−6
QHD / 1440p
5−6
0−1
low / 720p
40−45
16−18
medium / 1080p
21−24
8−9
The average gaming FPS of FirePro V7900 in Forza Horizon 4 is 166% more, than Quadro K2000M.
low / 768p
70−75
40−45
medium / 768p
60−65
−
high / 1080p
21−24
5−6
ultra / 1080p
9−10
2−3
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
medium / 720p
−
35−40
The average gaming FPS of FirePro V7900 in Grand Theft Auto V is 112% more, than Quadro K2000M.
high / 1080p
7−8
1−2
ultra / 1080p
5−6
0−1
4K / 2160p
1−2
0−1
low / 720p
21−24
5−6
medium / 1080p
9−10
3−4
The average gaming FPS of FirePro V7900 in Metro Exodus is 333% more, than Quadro K2000M.
low / 768p
100−110
90−95
high / 1080p
−
85−90
ultra / 1080p
90−95
70−75
medium / 1080p
100−105
90−95
The average gaming FPS of FirePro V7900 in Minecraft is 17% more, than Quadro K2000M.
high / 1080p
20−22
−
ultra / 1080p
16−18
12−14
low / 720p
45−50
27−30
medium / 1080p
21−24
14−16
The average gaming FPS of FirePro V7900 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 61% more, than Quadro K2000M.
high / 1080p
12−14
−
ultra / 1080p
8−9
4−5
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
low / 720p
21−24
6−7
medium / 1080p
12−14
−
The average gaming FPS of FirePro V7900 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 200% more, than Quadro K2000M.
low / 768p
40−45
12−14
medium / 768p
24−27
8−9
high / 1080p
14−16
4−5
ultra / 1080p
8−9
3−4
4K / 2160p
7−8
0−1
The average gaming FPS of FirePro V7900 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 214% more, than Quadro K2000M.
low / 768p
95−100
75−80
medium / 768p
55−60
35−40
ultra / 1080p
27−30
16−18
high / 768p
45−50
30−35
The average gaming FPS of FirePro V7900 in World of Tanks is 39% more, than Quadro K2000M.
Full Specs
FirePro V7900
Quadro K2000M
Architecture
TeraScale 3
Kepler
Code name
Cayman
N14P-Q3
Type
Workstation
Mobile workstation
Release date
24 May 2011
1 June 2012
Pipelines
1280
384
Core clock speed
725 MHz
745 MHz
Transistor count
2,640 million
1,270 million
Manufacturing process technology
40 nm
28 nm
Texture fill rate
58.00
23.84
Floating-point performance
1,856.0 gflops
572.2 gflops
Length
279 mm
Memory bus width
256 Bit
128 Bit
Memory clock speed
5000 MHz
1800 MHz
Memory bandwidth
160 GB/s
28.8 GB/s
Shared memory
-
DirectX
11.2 (11_0)
12 (11_0)
Shader Model
5.0
5.1
OpenGL
4.4
4.6
OpenCL
1.2
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
1.1.126
CUDA
+
Bus support
PCIe 2.1 x16
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)
171 Mh/s
18 Mh/s
Laptop size
medium sized
Optimus
+
Form factor
full height / full length
StereoOutput3D
+
DisplayPort count
4
Dual-link DVI support
+
Check Price
Check Price