FirePro V7900 vs Quadro K4200

In this comparison between FirePro V7900 and Quadro K4200 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people FirePro V7900 will be the best choice, for others Quadro K4200 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.

FirePro V7900 Check Price

Quadro K4200 Check Price

Main Specs

	FirePro V7900	Quadro K4200
Power consumption (TDP)	151 Watt	108 Watt
Interface	PCIe 2.0 x16	PCIe 2.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors	1x 6-pin	1x 6-pin
Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount	2 GB	4 GB
Display Connectors	4x DisplayPort	1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort
	Check Price	Check Price

FirePro V7900 has 39% more power consumption, than Quadro K4200.
Both video cards are using PCIe 2.0 x16 interface connection to a motherboard.
Quadro K4200 has 2 GB more memory, than FirePro V7900.
Both cards are used in Desktops.
FirePro V7900 is build with TeraScale 3 architecture, and Quadro K4200 - with Kepler.
Core clock speed of Quadro K4200 is 46 MHz higher, than FirePro V7900.
FirePro V7900 is manufactured by 40 nm process technology, and Quadro K4200 - by 28 nm process technology.
FirePro V7900 is 38 mm longer, than Quadro K4200.
Memory clock speed of Quadro K4200 is 400 MHz higher, than FirePro V7900.

Game benchmarks


high / 1080p	10−12	21−24
ultra / 1080p	6−7	12−14
QHD / 1440p	1−2	7−8
4K / 2160p	−	5−6
low / 720p	24−27	40−45
medium / 1080p	14−16	27−30
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4200 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 100% more, than FirePro V7900.
high / 1080p	18−20	35−40
ultra / 1080p	14−16	30−33
QHD / 1440p	1−2	14−16
4K / 2160p	−	9−10
low / 720p	35−40	70−75
medium / 1080p	20−22	35−40
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4200 in Battlefield 5 is 111% more, than FirePro V7900.
low / 768p	45−50	50−55
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4200 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than FirePro V7900.
low / 768p	180−190	230−240
medium / 768p	150−160	200−210
ultra / 1080p	75−80	120−130
QHD / 1440p	45−50	100−105
4K / 2160p	30−33	55−60
high / 768p	110−120	170−180
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4200 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 48% more, than FirePro V7900.
low / 768p	55−60	60−65
ultra / 1080p	30−33	50−55
medium / 1080p	45−50	55−60
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4200 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 26% more, than FirePro V7900.
low / 768p	95−100	120−130
medium / 768p	80−85	110−120
ultra / 1080p	50−55	80−85
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4200 in Dota 2 is 38% more, than FirePro V7900.
high / 1080p	12−14	27−30
ultra / 1080p	12−14	24−27
QHD / 1440p	−	20−22
4K / 2160p	5−6	8−9
low / 720p	30−33	55−60
medium / 1080p	14−16	27−30
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4200 in Far Cry 5 is 93% more, than FirePro V7900.
high / 1080p	20−22	35−40
ultra / 1080p	14−16	27−30
QHD / 1440p	−	16−18
low / 720p	80−85	130−140
medium / 1080p	35−40	75−80
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4200 in Fortnite is 76% more, than FirePro V7900.
high / 1080p	18−20	35−40
ultra / 1080p	14−16	27−30
QHD / 1440p	5−6	16−18
4K / 2160p	−	14−16
low / 720p	40−45	70−75
medium / 1080p	21−24	40−45
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4200 in Forza Horizon 4 is 95% more, than FirePro V7900.
low / 768p	70−75	100−110
medium / 768p	60−65	95−100
high / 1080p	21−24	40−45
ultra / 1080p	9−10	18−20
QHD / 1440p	0−1	8−9
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4200 in Grand Theft Auto V is 60% more, than FirePro V7900.
high / 1080p	7−8	14−16
ultra / 1080p	5−6	10−12
QHD / 1440p	−	10−12
4K / 2160p	1−2	3−4
low / 720p	21−24	40−45
medium / 1080p	9−10	18−20
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4200 in Metro Exodus is 100% more, than FirePro V7900.
low / 768p	100−110	120−130
ultra / 1080p	90−95	−
medium / 1080p	100−105	110−120
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4200 in Minecraft is 16% more, than FirePro V7900.
high / 1080p	20−22	−
ultra / 1080p	16−18	14−16
low / 720p	45−50	75−80
medium / 1080p	21−24	18−20
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4200 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 27% more, than FirePro V7900.
high / 1080p	12−14	16−18
ultra / 1080p	8−9	10−12
QHD / 1440p	0−1	2−3
4K / 2160p	−	2−3
low / 720p	21−24	40−45
medium / 1080p	12−14	21−24
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4200 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 64% more, than FirePro V7900.
low / 768p	40−45	80−85
medium / 768p	24−27	50−55
high / 1080p	14−16	27−30
ultra / 1080p	8−9	14−16
4K / 2160p	7−8	9−10
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4200 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 94% more, than FirePro V7900.
low / 768p	95−100	90−95
medium / 768p	55−60	60−65
ultra / 1080p	27−30	40−45
high / 768p	45−50	55−60
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4200 in World of Tanks is 10% more, than FirePro V7900.

Full Specs

	FirePro V7900	Quadro K4200
Architecture	TeraScale 3	Kepler
Code name	Cayman	GK104
Type	Workstation	Workstation
Release date	24 May 2011	22 July 2014
Pipelines	1280	1344
Core clock speed	725 MHz	771 MHz
Boost Clock		784 MHz
Transistor count	2,640 million	3,540 million
Manufacturing process technology	40 nm	28 nm
Texture fill rate	58.00	87.81
Floating-point performance	1,856.0 gflops	2,107 gflops
Length	279 mm	241 mm
Memory bus width	256 Bit	256 Bit
Memory clock speed	5000 MHz	5400 MHz
Memory bandwidth	160 GB/s	172.8 GB/s
DirectX	11.2 (11_0)	12 (11_0)
Shader Model	5.0	5.1
OpenGL	4.4	4.6
OpenCL	1.2	1.2
Vulkan	N/A	1.1.126
CUDA		3.0
Bus support	PCIe 2.1 x16
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)	171 Mh/s	119 Mh/s
Form factor	full height / full length
StereoOutput3D	+
DisplayPort count	4
Dual-link DVI support	+
	Check Price	Check Price

FirePro V7900 vs Quadro K4200

Main Specs

Game benchmarks

Full Specs

Similar compares