FirePro V7900 vs Radeon Pro WX 4100

In this comparison between FirePro V7900 and Radeon Pro WX 4100 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people FirePro V7900 will be the best choice, for others Radeon Pro WX 4100 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.

FirePro V7900 Check Price

Radeon Pro WX 4100 Check Price

Main Specs

	FirePro V7900	Radeon Pro WX 4100
Power consumption (TDP)	151 Watt	50 Watt
Interface	PCIe 2.0 x16	PCIe 3.0 x8
Supplementary power connectors	1x 6-pin	None
Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount	2 GB	4 GB
Display Connectors	4x DisplayPort	4x mini-DisplayPort
	Check Price	Check Price

FirePro V7900 has 202% more power consumption, than Radeon Pro WX 4100.
FirePro V7900 is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and Radeon Pro WX 4100 uses PCIe 3.0 x8 interface.
Radeon Pro WX 4100 has 2 GB more memory, than FirePro V7900.
Both cards are used in Desktops.
FirePro V7900 is build with TeraScale 3 architecture, and Radeon Pro WX 4100 - with GCN 4.0.
Core clock speed of Radeon Pro WX 4100 is 400 MHz higher, than FirePro V7900.
FirePro V7900 is manufactured by 40 nm process technology, and Radeon Pro WX 4100 - by 14 nm process technology.
Memory clock speed of Radeon Pro WX 4100 is 1000 MHz higher, than FirePro V7900.

Game benchmarks


high / 1080p	10−12	18−20
ultra / 1080p	6−7	10−12
QHD / 1440p	1−2	5−6
4K / 2160p	−	4−5
low / 720p	24−27	35−40
medium / 1080p	14−16	21−24
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX 4100 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 72% more, than FirePro V7900.
high / 1080p	18−20	30−33
ultra / 1080p	14−16	24−27
QHD / 1440p	1−2	9−10
4K / 2160p	−	7−8
low / 720p	35−40	60−65
medium / 1080p	20−22	30−35
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX 4100 in Battlefield 5 is 77% more, than FirePro V7900.
low / 768p	45−50	50−55
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX 4100 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than FirePro V7900.
low / 768p	180−190	220−230
medium / 768p	150−160	190−200
ultra / 1080p	75−80	110−120
QHD / 1440p	45−50	75−80
4K / 2160p	30−33	40−45
high / 768p	110−120	160−170
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX 4100 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 34% more, than FirePro V7900.
low / 768p	55−60	60−65
ultra / 1080p	30−33	45−50
medium / 1080p	45−50	55−60
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX 4100 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 22% more, than FirePro V7900.
low / 768p	95−100	110−120
medium / 768p	80−85	100−110
ultra / 1080p	50−55	75−80
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX 4100 in Dota 2 is 28% more, than FirePro V7900.
high / 1080p	12−14	21−24
ultra / 1080p	12−14	21−24
QHD / 1440p	−	18−20
4K / 2160p	5−6	7−8
low / 720p	30−33	45−50
medium / 1080p	14−16	24−27
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX 4100 in Far Cry 5 is 66% more, than FirePro V7900.
high / 1080p	20−22	30−33
ultra / 1080p	14−16	21−24
QHD / 1440p	−	14−16
low / 720p	80−85	110−120
medium / 1080p	35−40	65−70
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX 4100 in Fortnite is 51% more, than FirePro V7900.
high / 1080p	18−20	30−35
ultra / 1080p	14−16	24−27
QHD / 1440p	5−6	12−14
4K / 2160p	−	12−14
low / 720p	40−45	65−70
medium / 1080p	21−24	35−40
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX 4100 in Forza Horizon 4 is 75% more, than FirePro V7900.
low / 768p	70−75	95−100
medium / 768p	60−65	85−90
high / 1080p	21−24	35−40
ultra / 1080p	9−10	14−16
QHD / 1440p	0−1	5−6
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX 4100 in Grand Theft Auto V is 43% more, than FirePro V7900.
high / 1080p	7−8	12−14
ultra / 1080p	5−6	9−10
4K / 2160p	1−2	2−3
low / 720p	21−24	35−40
medium / 1080p	9−10	16−18
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX 4100 in Metro Exodus is 66% more, than FirePro V7900.
low / 768p	100−110	110−120
ultra / 1080p	90−95	−
medium / 1080p	100−105	110−120
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX 4100 in Minecraft is 11% more, than FirePro V7900.
high / 1080p	20−22	−
ultra / 1080p	16−18	14−16
low / 720p	45−50	65−70
medium / 1080p	21−24	18−20
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX 4100 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 13% more, than FirePro V7900.
high / 1080p	12−14	14−16
ultra / 1080p	8−9	9−10
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
4K / 2160p	−	0−1
low / 720p	21−24	35−40
medium / 1080p	12−14	18−20
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX 4100 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 42% more, than FirePro V7900.
low / 768p	40−45	65−70
medium / 768p	24−27	40−45
high / 1080p	14−16	21−24
ultra / 1080p	8−9	12−14
4K / 2160p	7−8	7−8
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX 4100 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 57% more, than FirePro V7900.
low / 768p	95−100	90−95
medium / 768p	55−60	60−65
ultra / 1080p	27−30	40−45
high / 768p	45−50	55−60
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX 4100 in World of Tanks is 10% more, than FirePro V7900.

Full Specs

	FirePro V7900	Radeon Pro WX 4100
Architecture	TeraScale 3	GCN 4.0
Code name	Cayman	Baffin
Type	Workstation	Workstation
Release date	24 May 2011	10 November 2016
Pipelines	1280	1024
Core clock speed	725 MHz	1125 MHz
Boost Clock		1201 MHz
Transistor count	2,640 million	3,000 million
Manufacturing process technology	40 nm	14 nm
Texture fill rate	58.00	76.86
Floating-point performance	1,856.0 gflops	2,460 gflops
Length	279 mm
Memory bus width	256 Bit	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	5000 MHz	6000 MHz
Memory bandwidth	160 GB/s	96 GB/s
DirectX	11.2 (11_0)	12 (12_0)
Shader Model	5.0	6.4
OpenGL	4.4	4.6
OpenCL	1.2	2.0
Vulkan	N/A	1.2.131
Bus support	PCIe 2.1 x16
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)	171 Mh/s
Form factor	full height / full length
StereoOutput3D	+
DisplayPort count	4
Dual-link DVI support	+
	Check Price	Check Price

FirePro V7900 vs Radeon Pro WX 4100

Main Specs

Game benchmarks

Full Specs

Similar compares