FirePro V7900 vs Tesla C2070
In this comparison between FirePro V7900 and Tesla C2070 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people FirePro V7900 will be the best choice, for others Tesla C2070 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
Tesla C2070
Main Specs
FirePro V7900
Tesla C2070
Power consumption (TDP)
151 Watt
238 Watt
Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
PCIe 2.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors
1x 6-pin
1x 8-pin
Memory type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount
2 GB
6 GB
Display Connectors
4x DisplayPort
1x DVI
Check Price
Tesla C2070 has 57% more power consumption, than FirePro V7900.
Both video cards are using PCIe 2.0 x16 interface connection to a motherboard.
Tesla C2070 has 4 GB more memory, than FirePro V7900.
Both cards are used in Desktops.
FirePro V7900 is build with TeraScale 3 architecture, and Tesla C2070 - with Fermi.
Core clock speed of FirePro V7900 is 151 MHz higher, than Tesla C2070.
FirePro V7900 and Tesla C2070 are manufactured by 40 nm process technology.
FirePro V7900 is 31 mm longer, than Tesla C2070.
Memory clock speed of FirePro V7900 is 2012 MHz higher, than Tesla C2070.
Game benchmarks
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Battlefield 5
Call of Duty: Warzone
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Cyberpunk 2077
Dota 2
Far Cry 5
Fortnite
Forza Horizon 4
Grand Theft Auto V
Metro Exodus
Minecraft
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS
Red Dead Redemption 2
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
World of Tanks
high / 1080p
10−12
16−18
ultra / 1080p
6−7
9−10
QHD / 1440p
1−2
3−4
low / 720p
24−27
30−35
medium / 1080p
14−16
21−24
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 54% more, than FirePro V7900.
high / 1080p
18−20
27−30
ultra / 1080p
14−16
21−24
QHD / 1440p
1−2
6−7
4K / 2160p
−
5−6
low / 720p
35−40
55−60
medium / 1080p
20−22
30−33
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Battlefield 5 is 61% more, than FirePro V7900.
low / 768p
45−50
50−55
high / 1080p
−
45−50
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than FirePro V7900.
low / 768p
180−190
210−220
medium / 768p
150−160
180−190
ultra / 1080p
75−80
100−110
QHD / 1440p
45−50
60−65
4K / 2160p
30−33
30−35
high / 768p
110−120
150−160
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 23% more, than FirePro V7900.
low / 768p
55−60
60−65
ultra / 1080p
30−33
40−45
medium / 1080p
45−50
55−60
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 20% more, than FirePro V7900.
low / 768p
95−100
110−120
medium / 768p
80−85
100−110
ultra / 1080p
50−55
70−75
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Dota 2 is 25% more, than FirePro V7900.
high / 1080p
12−14
20−22
ultra / 1080p
12−14
18−20
QHD / 1440p
−
18−20
4K / 2160p
5−6
6−7
low / 720p
30−33
40−45
medium / 1080p
14−16
21−24
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Far Cry 5 is 46% more, than FirePro V7900.
high / 1080p
20−22
27−30
ultra / 1080p
14−16
21−24
QHD / 1440p
−
12−14
low / 720p
80−85
100−110
medium / 1080p
35−40
60−65
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Fortnite is 38% more, than FirePro V7900.
high / 1080p
18−20
27−30
ultra / 1080p
14−16
21−24
QHD / 1440p
5−6
10−11
low / 720p
40−45
55−60
medium / 1080p
21−24
30−35
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Forza Horizon 4 is 50% more, than FirePro V7900.
low / 768p
70−75
90−95
medium / 768p
60−65
80−85
high / 1080p
21−24
30−35
ultra / 1080p
9−10
12−14
QHD / 1440p
0−1
3−4
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Grand Theft Auto V is 34% more, than FirePro V7900.
high / 1080p
7−8
10−11
ultra / 1080p
5−6
8−9
4K / 2160p
1−2
1−2
low / 720p
21−24
30−35
medium / 1080p
9−10
14−16
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Metro Exodus is 44% more, than FirePro V7900.
low / 768p
100−110
110−120
ultra / 1080p
90−95
−
medium / 1080p
100−105
110−120
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Minecraft is 11% more, than FirePro V7900.
high / 1080p
20−22
−
ultra / 1080p
16−18
14−16
low / 720p
45−50
60−65
medium / 1080p
21−24
18−20
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 10% more, than FirePro V7900.
high / 1080p
12−14
12−14
ultra / 1080p
8−9
9−10
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
low / 720p
21−24
30−35
medium / 1080p
12−14
16−18
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 28% more, than FirePro V7900.
low / 768p
40−45
60−65
medium / 768p
24−27
35−40
high / 1080p
14−16
21−24
ultra / 1080p
8−9
12−14
4K / 2160p
7−8
6−7
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 47% more, than FirePro V7900.
low / 768p
95−100
90−95
medium / 768p
55−60
60−65
ultra / 1080p
27−30
35−40
high / 768p
45−50
55−60
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in World of Tanks is 8% more, than FirePro V7900.
Full Specs
FirePro V7900
Tesla C2070
Architecture
TeraScale 3
Fermi
Code name
Cayman
GF100
Type
Workstation
Workstation
Release date
24 May 2011
25 July 2011
Pipelines
1280
448
Core clock speed
725 MHz
574 MHz
Transistor count
2,640 million
3,100 million
Manufacturing process technology
40 nm
40 nm
Texture fill rate
58.00
32.14
Floating-point performance
1,856.0 gflops
1,030.4 gflops
Length
279 mm
248 mm
Memory bus width
256 Bit
384 Bit
Memory clock speed
5000 MHz
2988 MHz
Memory bandwidth
160 GB/s
143.4 GB/s
DirectX
11.2 (11_0)
12 (11_0)
Shader Model
5.0
5.1
OpenGL
4.4
4.6
OpenCL
1.2
1.1
Vulkan
N/A
N/A
CUDA
2.0
Bus support
PCIe 2.1 x16
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)
171 Mh/s
Form factor
full height / full length
StereoOutput3D
+
DisplayPort count
4
Dual-link DVI support
+
Check Price