FirePro V7900 vs Tesla C2075

In this comparison between FirePro V7900 and Tesla C2075 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people FirePro V7900 will be the best choice, for others Tesla C2075 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.

FirePro V7900 Check Price

Tesla C2075 Check Price

Main Specs

	FirePro V7900	Tesla C2075
Power consumption (TDP)	151 Watt	247 Watt
Interface	PCIe 2.0 x16	PCIe 2.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors	1x 6-pin	1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount	2 GB	6 GB
Display Connectors	4x DisplayPort	1x DVI
	Check Price	Check Price

Tesla C2075 has 63% more power consumption, than FirePro V7900.
Both video cards are using PCIe 2.0 x16 interface connection to a motherboard.
Tesla C2075 has 4 GB more memory, than FirePro V7900.
Both cards are used in Desktops.
FirePro V7900 is build with TeraScale 3 architecture, and Tesla C2075 - with Fermi 2.0.
Core clock speed of FirePro V7900 is 151 MHz higher, than Tesla C2075.
FirePro V7900 and Tesla C2075 are manufactured by 40 nm process technology.
FirePro V7900 is 31 mm longer, than Tesla C2075.
Memory clock speed of FirePro V7900 is 1868 MHz higher, than Tesla C2075.

Game benchmarks


high / 1080p	10−12	16−18
ultra / 1080p	6−7	10−11
QHD / 1440p	1−2	4−5
low / 720p	24−27	35−40
medium / 1080p	14−16	21−24
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 63% more, than FirePro V7900.
high / 1080p	18−20	27−30
ultra / 1080p	14−16	21−24
QHD / 1440p	1−2	6−7
4K / 2160p	−	6−7
low / 720p	35−40	55−60
medium / 1080p	20−22	30−35
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in Battlefield 5 is 61% more, than FirePro V7900.
low / 768p	45−50	50−55
high / 1080p	−	50−55
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than FirePro V7900.
low / 768p	180−190	210−220
medium / 768p	150−160	190−200
ultra / 1080p	75−80	100−110
QHD / 1440p	45−50	65−70
4K / 2160p	30−33	30−35
high / 768p	110−120	150−160
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 26% more, than FirePro V7900.
low / 768p	55−60	60−65
ultra / 1080p	30−33	45−50
medium / 1080p	45−50	55−60
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 22% more, than FirePro V7900.
low / 768p	95−100	110−120
medium / 768p	80−85	100−110
ultra / 1080p	50−55	70−75
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in Dota 2 is 25% more, than FirePro V7900.
high / 1080p	12−14	21−24
ultra / 1080p	12−14	18−20
QHD / 1440p	−	18−20
4K / 2160p	5−6	6−7
low / 720p	30−33	45−50
medium / 1080p	14−16	21−24
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in Far Cry 5 is 53% more, than FirePro V7900.
high / 1080p	20−22	27−30
ultra / 1080p	14−16	21−24
QHD / 1440p	−	14−16
low / 720p	80−85	110−120
medium / 1080p	35−40	60−65
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in Fortnite is 46% more, than FirePro V7900.
high / 1080p	18−20	27−30
ultra / 1080p	14−16	21−24
QHD / 1440p	5−6	10−11
low / 720p	40−45	60−65
medium / 1080p	21−24	30−35
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in Forza Horizon 4 is 55% more, than FirePro V7900.
low / 768p	70−75	90−95
medium / 768p	60−65	80−85
high / 1080p	21−24	30−35
ultra / 1080p	9−10	14−16
QHD / 1440p	0−1	4−5
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in Grand Theft Auto V is 34% more, than FirePro V7900.
high / 1080p	7−8	10−12
ultra / 1080p	5−6	8−9
4K / 2160p	1−2	1−2
low / 720p	21−24	30−35
medium / 1080p	9−10	14−16
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in Metro Exodus is 44% more, than FirePro V7900.
low / 768p	100−110	110−120
ultra / 1080p	90−95	−
medium / 1080p	100−105	110−120
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in Minecraft is 11% more, than FirePro V7900.
high / 1080p	20−22	−
ultra / 1080p	16−18	14−16
low / 720p	45−50	60−65
medium / 1080p	21−24	18−20
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 10% more, than FirePro V7900.
high / 1080p	12−14	14−16
ultra / 1080p	8−9	9−10
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
low / 720p	21−24	30−35
medium / 1080p	12−14	18−20
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 35% more, than FirePro V7900.
low / 768p	40−45	60−65
medium / 768p	24−27	35−40
high / 1080p	14−16	21−24
ultra / 1080p	8−9	12−14
4K / 2160p	7−8	7−8
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 47% more, than FirePro V7900.
low / 768p	95−100	90−95
medium / 768p	55−60	60−65
ultra / 1080p	27−30	35−40
high / 768p	45−50	55−60
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in World of Tanks is 8% more, than FirePro V7900.

Full Specs

	FirePro V7900	Tesla C2075
Architecture	TeraScale 3	Fermi 2.0
Code name	Cayman	GF110
Type	Workstation	Workstation
Release date	24 May 2011	25 July 2011
Pipelines	1280	448
Core clock speed	725 MHz	574 MHz
Transistor count	2,640 million	3,000 million
Manufacturing process technology	40 nm	40 nm
Texture fill rate	58.00	32.14
Floating-point performance	1,856.0 gflops	1,030.4 gflops
Length	279 mm	248 mm
Memory bus width	256 Bit	384 Bit
Memory clock speed	5000 MHz	3132 MHz
Memory bandwidth	160 GB/s	150.3 GB/s
DirectX	11.2 (11_0)	12 (11_0)
Shader Model	5.0	5.1
OpenGL	4.4	4.6
OpenCL	1.2	1.1
Vulkan	N/A	N/A
CUDA		2.0
Bus support	PCIe 2.1 x16
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)	171 Mh/s	94 Mh/s
Form factor	full height / full length
StereoOutput3D	+
DisplayPort count	4
Dual-link DVI support	+
	Check Price	Check Price

FirePro V7900 vs Tesla C2075

Main Specs

Game benchmarks

Full Specs

Similar compares