FirePro S9000 vs FirePro W4100

When comparing FirePro S9000 and FirePro W4100, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between FirePro S9000 and FirePro W4100 is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.

FirePro S9000

FirePro W4100 Check Price

Main Specs

	FirePro S9000	FirePro W4100
Power consumption (TDP)	350 Watt	50 Watt
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	PCIe 3.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors	1x 8-pin	None
Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount	6 GB	2 GB
Display Connectors	1x DisplayPort	4x mini-DisplayPort
		Check Price

FirePro S9000 has 600% more power consumption, than FirePro W4100.
Both video cards are using PCIe 3.0 x16 interface connection to a motherboard.
FirePro S9000 has 4 GB more memory, than FirePro W4100.
Both cards are used in Desktops.
FirePro S9000 is build with GCN 1.0 architecture, and FirePro W4100 - with GCN.
Core clock speed of FirePro S9000 is 270 MHz higher, than FirePro W4100.
FirePro S9000 and FirePro W4100 are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
FirePro S9000 is 96 mm longer, than FirePro W4100.
Memory clock speed of FirePro S9000 is 1500 MHz higher, than FirePro W4100.

Game benchmarks


high / 1080p	35−40	6−7
ultra / 1080p	21−24	4−5
QHD / 1440p	16−18	0−1
4K / 2160p	10−11	−
low / 720p	60−65	16−18
medium / 1080p	40−45	8−9
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 355% more, than FirePro W4100.
high / 1080p	55−60	12−14
ultra / 1080p	45−50	10−11
QHD / 1440p	35−40	0−1
4K / 2160p	18−20	−
low / 720p	100−110	24−27
medium / 1080p	60−65	12−14
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Battlefield 5 is 353% more, than FirePro W4100.
low / 768p	50−55	45−50
high / 1080p	−	45−50
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than FirePro W4100.
low / 768p	250−260	130−140
medium / 768p	220−230	110−120
ultra / 1080p	180−190	50−55
QHD / 1440p	110−120	30−33
4K / 2160p	70−75	27−30
high / 768p	210−220	80−85
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 139% more, than FirePro W4100.
low / 768p	60−65	55−60
ultra / 1080p	−	18−20
medium / 1080p	55−60	45−50
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 15% more, than FirePro W4100.
low / 768p	120−130	80−85
medium / 768p	110−120	60−65
ultra / 1080p	100−110	30−35
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Dota 2 is 94% more, than FirePro W4100.
high / 1080p	45−50	8−9
ultra / 1080p	40−45	8−9
QHD / 1440p	27−30	−
4K / 2160p	14−16	3−4
low / 720p	80−85	18−20
medium / 1080p	45−50	9−10
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Far Cry 5 is 422% more, than FirePro W4100.
high / 1080p	60−65	14−16
ultra / 1080p	45−50	10−11
QHD / 1440p	27−30	−
4K / 2160p	27−30	−
low / 720p	180−190	60−65
medium / 1080p	110−120	21−24
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Fortnite is 277% more, than FirePro W4100.
high / 1080p	60−65	12−14
ultra / 1080p	45−50	10−12
QHD / 1440p	30−35	1−2
4K / 2160p	24−27	−
low / 720p	100−110	24−27
medium / 1080p	65−70	14−16
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Forza Horizon 4 is 384% more, than FirePro W4100.
low / 768p	140−150	50−55
medium / 768p	120−130	45−50
high / 1080p	70−75	12−14
ultra / 1080p	30−35	6−7
QHD / 1440p	21−24	0−1
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Grand Theft Auto V is 220% more, than FirePro W4100.
high / 1080p	24−27	5−6
ultra / 1080p	20−22	3−4
QHD / 1440p	16−18	−
4K / 2160p	8−9	0−1
low / 720p	65−70	12−14
medium / 1080p	30−35	6−7
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Metro Exodus is 414% more, than FirePro W4100.
low / 768p	130−140	95−100
high / 1080p	−	90−95
ultra / 1080p	−	80−85
medium / 1080p	120−130	90−95
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Minecraft is 36% more, than FirePro W4100.
high / 1080p	−	16−18
ultra / 1080p	14−16	14−16
low / 720p	100−110	30−35
medium / 1080p	18−20	18−20
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 109% more, than FirePro W4100.
high / 1080p	24−27	−
ultra / 1080p	16−18	7−8
QHD / 1440p	10−11	0−1
4K / 2160p	7−8	−
low / 720p	65−70	12−14
medium / 1080p	35−40	10−12
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 300% more, than FirePro W4100.
low / 768p	130−140	24−27
medium / 768p	85−90	16−18
high / 1080p	45−50	9−10
ultra / 1080p	24−27	6−7
4K / 2160p	16−18	6−7
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 376% more, than FirePro W4100.
low / 768p	90−95	85−90
medium / 768p	60−65	45−50
ultra / 1080p	50−55	20−22
high / 768p	60−65	35−40
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in World of Tanks is 39% more, than FirePro W4100.

Full Specs

	FirePro S9000	FirePro W4100
Architecture	GCN 1.0	GCN
Code name	Tahiti	Cape Verde
Type	Workstation	Workstation
Release date	24 August 2012	2 October 2015
Pipelines	1792	512
Core clock speed	900 MHz	630 MHz
Transistor count	4,313 million	1,500 million
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	28 nm
Texture fill rate	100.8	20.16
Floating-point performance	3,226 gflops	645.1 gflops
Length	267 mm	171 mm
Memory bus width	384 Bit	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	5500 MHz	4000 MHz
Memory bandwidth	264 GB/s	72 GB/s
Shared memory		-
DirectX	12 (11_1)	12 (11_1)
Shader Model	5.1	5.1
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	1.2	1.2
Vulkan	1.2.131	1.2.131
Bus support	PCIe 3.0	PCIe 3.0
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)	92 Mh/s	79 Mh/s
Form factor	full height / full length	low profile / half length
DisplayPort count	1
Dual-link DVI support	+	+
AppAcceleration		+
		Check Price

FirePro S9000 vs FirePro W4100

Main Specs

Game benchmarks

Full Specs

Similar compares