FirePro W4100 vs Quadro P2000

When comparing FirePro W4100 and Quadro P2000, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between FirePro W4100 and Quadro P2000 is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.

FirePro W4100 Check Price

Quadro P2000 Check Price

Main Specs

	FirePro W4100	Quadro P2000
Power consumption (TDP)	50 Watt	75 Watt
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	PCIe 3.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors	None	None
Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount	2 GB	5 GB
Display Connectors	4x mini-DisplayPort	4x DisplayPort
	Check Price	Check Price

Quadro P2000 has 50% more power consumption, than FirePro W4100.
Both video cards are using PCIe 3.0 x16 interface connection to a motherboard.
Quadro P2000 has 3 GB more memory, than FirePro W4100.
Both cards are used in Desktops.
FirePro W4100 is build with GCN architecture, and Quadro P2000 - with Pascal.
Core clock speed of Quadro P2000 is 446 MHz higher, than FirePro W4100.
FirePro W4100 is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Quadro P2000 - by 16 nm process technology.
Quadro P2000 is 30 mm longer, than FirePro W4100.
Memory clock speed of Quadro P2000 is 3008 MHz higher, than FirePro W4100.

Game benchmarks


high / 1080p	6−7	35−40
ultra / 1080p	4−5	24−27
QHD / 1440p	0−1	18−20
4K / 2160p	−	10−11
low / 720p	16−18	60−65
medium / 1080p	8−9	45−50
The average gaming FPS of Quadro P2000 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 377% more, than FirePro W4100.
high / 1080p	12−14	55−60
ultra / 1080p	10−11	50−55
QHD / 1440p	0−1	35−40
4K / 2160p	−	18−20
low / 720p	24−27	100−110
medium / 1080p	12−14	65−70
The average gaming FPS of Quadro P2000 in Battlefield 5 is 366% more, than FirePro W4100.
low / 768p	45−50	50−55
high / 1080p	45−50	−
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
The average gaming FPS of Quadro P2000 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than FirePro W4100.
low / 768p	130−140	250−260
medium / 768p	110−120	220−230
ultra / 1080p	50−55	180−190
QHD / 1440p	30−33	110−120
4K / 2160p	27−30	70−75
high / 768p	80−85	210−220
The average gaming FPS of Quadro P2000 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 139% more, than FirePro W4100.
low / 768p	55−60	60−65
ultra / 1080p	18−20	−
medium / 1080p	45−50	55−60
The average gaming FPS of Quadro P2000 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 15% more, than FirePro W4100.
low / 768p	80−85	120−130
medium / 768p	60−65	110−120
ultra / 1080p	30−35	100−110
The average gaming FPS of Quadro P2000 in Dota 2 is 94% more, than FirePro W4100.
high / 1080p	8−9	45−50
ultra / 1080p	8−9	40−45
QHD / 1440p	−	30−33
4K / 2160p	3−4	14−16
low / 720p	18−20	80−85
medium / 1080p	9−10	50−55
The average gaming FPS of Quadro P2000 in Far Cry 5 is 433% more, than FirePro W4100.
high / 1080p	14−16	60−65
ultra / 1080p	10−11	50−55
QHD / 1440p	−	30−33
4K / 2160p	−	27−30
low / 720p	60−65	180−190
medium / 1080p	21−24	110−120
The average gaming FPS of Quadro P2000 in Fortnite is 281% more, than FirePro W4100.
high / 1080p	12−14	60−65
ultra / 1080p	10−12	45−50
QHD / 1440p	1−2	30−35
4K / 2160p	−	24−27
low / 720p	24−27	110−120
medium / 1080p	14−16	65−70
The average gaming FPS of Quadro P2000 in Forza Horizon 4 is 400% more, than FirePro W4100.
low / 768p	50−55	140−150
medium / 768p	45−50	130−140
high / 1080p	12−14	70−75
ultra / 1080p	6−7	30−35
QHD / 1440p	0−1	24−27
The average gaming FPS of Quadro P2000 in Grand Theft Auto V is 231% more, than FirePro W4100.
high / 1080p	5−6	24−27
ultra / 1080p	3−4	21−24
QHD / 1440p	−	16−18
4K / 2160p	0−1	9−10
low / 720p	12−14	70−75
medium / 1080p	6−7	35−40
The average gaming FPS of Quadro P2000 in Metro Exodus is 457% more, than FirePro W4100.
low / 768p	95−100	130−140
high / 1080p	90−95	−
ultra / 1080p	80−85	−
medium / 1080p	90−95	120−130
The average gaming FPS of Quadro P2000 in Minecraft is 36% more, than FirePro W4100.
high / 1080p	16−18	−
ultra / 1080p	14−16	14−16
low / 720p	30−35	100−110
medium / 1080p	18−20	18−20
The average gaming FPS of Quadro P2000 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 109% more, than FirePro W4100.
high / 1080p	−	24−27
ultra / 1080p	7−8	16−18
QHD / 1440p	0−1	10−12
4K / 2160p	−	8−9
low / 720p	12−14	70−75
medium / 1080p	10−12	35−40
The average gaming FPS of Quadro P2000 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 320% more, than FirePro W4100.
low / 768p	24−27	130−140
medium / 768p	16−18	85−90
high / 1080p	9−10	50−55
ultra / 1080p	6−7	27−30
4K / 2160p	6−7	16−18
The average gaming FPS of Quadro P2000 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 392% more, than FirePro W4100.
low / 768p	85−90	90−95
medium / 768p	45−50	60−65
ultra / 1080p	20−22	55−60
high / 768p	35−40	−
The average gaming FPS of Quadro P2000 in World of Tanks is 34% more, than FirePro W4100.

Full Specs

	FirePro W4100	Quadro P2000
Architecture	GCN	Pascal
Code name	Cape Verde	GP106
Type	Workstation	Workstation
Release date	2 October 2015	6 February 2017
Pipelines	512	1024
Core clock speed	630 MHz	1076 MHz
Boost Clock		1480 MHz
Transistor count	1,500 million	4,400 million
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	16 nm
Texture fill rate	20.16	94.72
Floating-point performance	645.1 gflops	3,031 gflops
Length	171 mm	201 mm
Memory bus width	128 Bit	160 Bit
Memory clock speed	4000 MHz	7008 MHz
Memory bandwidth	72 GB/s	140.2 GB/s
Shared memory	-
DirectX	12 (11_1)	12 (12_1)
Shader Model	5.1	6.4
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	1.2	1.2
Vulkan	1.2.131	1.2.131
CUDA		6.1
Monero / XMR (CryptoNight)		0.19 kh/s
Bus support	PCIe 3.0
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)	79 Mh/s
Form factor	low profile / half length
Dual-link DVI support	+
AppAcceleration	+
	Check Price	Check Price

FirePro W4100 vs Quadro P2000

Main Specs

Game benchmarks

Full Specs

Similar compares