FirePro W4100 vs Tesla C2075
Find out if it is worth upgrading your current GPU setup by comparing FirePro W4100 and Tesla C2075. Here you can take a closer look at graphics cards specs, such as core clock speed, memory type and size, display connectors, etc. The price, overall benchmark and gaming performances are usually defining factors when it comes to choosing between FirePro W4100 and Tesla C2075. Make sure that the graphics card has compatible dimensions and will properly fit in your new or current computer case. Also these graphics cards may have different system power recommendations, so take that into consideration and upgrade your PSU if necessary.
Main Specs
FirePro W4100
Tesla C2075
Power consumption (TDP)
50 Watt
247 Watt
Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
PCIe 2.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors
None
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Memory type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount
2 GB
6 GB
Display Connectors
4x mini-DisplayPort
1x DVI
Check Price
Check Price
Tesla C2075 has 394% more power consumption, than FirePro W4100.
FirePro W4100 is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Tesla C2075 uses PCIe 2.0 x16 interface.
Tesla C2075 has 4 GB more memory, than FirePro W4100.
Both cards are used in Desktops.
FirePro W4100 is build with GCN architecture, and Tesla C2075 - with Fermi 2.0.
Core clock speed of FirePro W4100 is 56 MHz higher, than Tesla C2075.
FirePro W4100 is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Tesla C2075 - by 40 nm process technology.
Tesla C2075 is 77 mm longer, than FirePro W4100.
Memory clock speed of FirePro W4100 is 868 MHz higher, than Tesla C2075.
Game benchmarks
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Battlefield 5
Call of Duty: Warzone
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Cyberpunk 2077
Dota 2
Far Cry 5
Fortnite
Forza Horizon 4
Grand Theft Auto V
Metro Exodus
Minecraft
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS
Red Dead Redemption 2
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
World of Tanks
high / 1080p
6−7
16−18
ultra / 1080p
4−5
10−11
QHD / 1440p
0−1
4−5
low / 720p
16−18
35−40
medium / 1080p
8−9
21−24
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 133% more, than FirePro W4100.
high / 1080p
12−14
27−30
ultra / 1080p
10−11
21−24
QHD / 1440p
0−1
6−7
4K / 2160p
−
6−7
low / 720p
24−27
55−60
medium / 1080p
12−14
30−35
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in Battlefield 5 is 133% more, than FirePro W4100.
low / 768p
45−50
50−55
high / 1080p
45−50
50−55
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than FirePro W4100.
low / 768p
130−140
210−220
medium / 768p
110−120
190−200
ultra / 1080p
50−55
100−110
QHD / 1440p
30−33
65−70
4K / 2160p
27−30
30−35
high / 768p
80−85
150−160
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 72% more, than FirePro W4100.
low / 768p
55−60
60−65
ultra / 1080p
18−20
45−50
medium / 1080p
45−50
55−60
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 34% more, than FirePro W4100.
low / 768p
80−85
110−120
medium / 768p
60−65
100−110
ultra / 1080p
30−35
70−75
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in Dota 2 is 64% more, than FirePro W4100.
high / 1080p
8−9
21−24
ultra / 1080p
8−9
18−20
QHD / 1440p
−
18−20
4K / 2160p
3−4
6−7
low / 720p
18−20
45−50
medium / 1080p
9−10
21−24
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in Far Cry 5 is 155% more, than FirePro W4100.
high / 1080p
14−16
27−30
ultra / 1080p
10−11
21−24
QHD / 1440p
−
14−16
low / 720p
60−65
110−120
medium / 1080p
21−24
60−65
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in Fortnite is 111% more, than FirePro W4100.
high / 1080p
12−14
27−30
ultra / 1080p
10−12
21−24
QHD / 1440p
1−2
10−11
low / 720p
24−27
60−65
medium / 1080p
14−16
30−35
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in Forza Horizon 4 is 138% more, than FirePro W4100.
low / 768p
50−55
90−95
medium / 768p
45−50
80−85
high / 1080p
12−14
30−35
ultra / 1080p
6−7
14−16
QHD / 1440p
0−1
4−5
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in Grand Theft Auto V is 89% more, than FirePro W4100.
high / 1080p
5−6
10−12
ultra / 1080p
3−4
8−9
4K / 2160p
0−1
1−2
low / 720p
12−14
30−35
medium / 1080p
6−7
14−16
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in Metro Exodus is 128% more, than FirePro W4100.
low / 768p
95−100
110−120
high / 1080p
90−95
−
ultra / 1080p
80−85
−
medium / 1080p
90−95
110−120
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in Minecraft is 21% more, than FirePro W4100.
high / 1080p
16−18
−
ultra / 1080p
14−16
14−16
low / 720p
30−35
60−65
medium / 1080p
18−20
18−20
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 45% more, than FirePro W4100.
high / 1080p
−
14−16
ultra / 1080p
7−8
9−10
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
low / 720p
12−14
30−35
medium / 1080p
10−12
18−20
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 100% more, than FirePro W4100.
low / 768p
24−27
60−65
medium / 768p
16−18
35−40
high / 1080p
9−10
21−24
ultra / 1080p
6−7
12−14
4K / 2160p
6−7
7−8
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 115% more, than FirePro W4100.
low / 768p
85−90
90−95
medium / 768p
45−50
60−65
ultra / 1080p
20−22
35−40
high / 768p
35−40
55−60
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in World of Tanks is 29% more, than FirePro W4100.
Full Specs
FirePro W4100
Tesla C2075
Architecture
GCN
Fermi 2.0
Code name
Cape Verde
GF110
Type
Workstation
Workstation
Release date
2 October 2015
25 July 2011
Pipelines
512
448
Core clock speed
630 MHz
574 MHz
Transistor count
1,500 million
3,000 million
Manufacturing process technology
28 nm
40 nm
Texture fill rate
20.16
32.14
Floating-point performance
645.1 gflops
1,030.4 gflops
Length
171 mm
248 mm
Memory bus width
128 Bit
384 Bit
Memory clock speed
4000 MHz
3132 MHz
Memory bandwidth
72 GB/s
150.3 GB/s
Shared memory
-
DirectX
12 (11_1)
12 (11_0)
Shader Model
5.1
5.1
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
OpenCL
1.2
1.1
Vulkan
1.2.131
N/A
CUDA
2.0
Bus support
PCIe 3.0
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)
79 Mh/s
94 Mh/s
Form factor
low profile / half length
Dual-link DVI support
+
AppAcceleration
+
Check Price
Check Price
