FirePro V5800 vs FirePro W4190M
In this comparison between FirePro V5800 and FirePro W4190M you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people FirePro V5800 will be the best choice, for others FirePro W4190M will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
FirePro V5800
FirePro W4190M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: FirePro W4190M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with FirePro W4190M here:
Main Specs
| FirePro V5800 | FirePro W4190M | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 74 Watt | |
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 2 GB |
| Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- FirePro V5800 is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and FirePro W4190M uses PCIe 3.0 x8 interface.
- FirePro W4190M has 1 GB more memory, than FirePro V5800.
- FirePro V5800 is used in Desktops, and FirePro W4190M - in Mobile workstations.
- FirePro V5800 is build with TeraScale 2 architecture, and FirePro W4190M - with GCN.
- Core clock speed of FirePro W4190M is 135 MHz higher, than FirePro V5800.
- FirePro V5800 is manufactured by 40 nm process technology, and FirePro W4190M - by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of FirePro V5800 and FirePro W4190M is 4000 MHz.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 6−7 | 3−4 |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 1−2 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 16−18 | 14−16 |
| medium / 1080p | 7−8 | 5−6 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro V5800 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 33% more, than FirePro W4190M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 10−12 | 7−8 |
| ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 5−6 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 21−24 | 18−20 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 8−9 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro V5800 in Battlefield 5 is 30% more, than FirePro W4190M. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| high / 1080p | 45−50 | 40−45 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro V5800 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 4% more, than FirePro W4190M. | ||
| low / 768p | 130−140 | 120−130 |
| medium / 768p | 100−110 | 95−100 |
| ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | 24−27 |
| 4K / 2160p | 27−30 | − |
| high / 768p | 75−80 | 70−75 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro V5800 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 8% more, than FirePro W4190M. | ||
| low / 768p | 55−60 | 70−75 |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 20−22 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 40−45 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro W4190M in Cyberpunk 2077 is 9% more, than FirePro V5800. | ||
| low / 768p | 75−80 | 75−80 |
| medium / 768p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 27−30 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro V5800 in Dota 2 is 1% more, than FirePro W4190M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 7−8 | 3−4 |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 3−4 |
| 4K / 2160p | 3−4 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 18−20 | 14−16 |
| medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 5−6 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro V5800 in Far Cry 5 is 66% more, than FirePro W4190M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 7−8 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 4−5 |
| low / 720p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
| medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro V5800 in Fortnite is 13% more, than FirePro W4190M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 10−12 | 6−7 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 6−7 |
| QHD / 1440p | 1−2 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 24−27 | 20−22 |
| medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 9−10 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro V5800 in Forza Horizon 4 is 50% more, than FirePro W4190M. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
| medium / 768p | 40−45 | − |
| high / 1080p | 10−12 | 8−9 |
| ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 3−4 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| medium / 720p | − | 40−45 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro V5800 in Grand Theft Auto V is 21% more, than FirePro W4190M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 4−5 | 2−3 |
| ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 10−12 | 7−8 |
| medium / 1080p | 6−7 | 3−4 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro V5800 in Metro Exodus is 75% more, than FirePro W4190M. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 85−90 |
| high / 1080p | 85−90 | 65−70 |
| ultra / 1080p | 80−85 | − |
| medium / 1080p | 90−95 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro V5800 in Minecraft is 16% more, than FirePro W4190M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 16−18 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
| low / 720p | 30−35 | 27−30 |
| medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro V5800 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 16% more, than FirePro W4190M. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 6−7 |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 4−5 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 10−12 | 7−8 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−11 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro V5800 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 50% more, than FirePro W4190M. | ||
| low / 768p | 21−24 | 16−18 |
| medium / 768p | 16−18 | 12−14 |
| high / 1080p | 9−10 | 6−7 |
| ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 4−5 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 1−2 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro V5800 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 30% more, than FirePro W4190M. | ||
| low / 768p | 85−90 | 70−75 |
| medium / 768p | 40−45 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 16−18 |
| high / 768p | 35−40 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro V5800 in World of Tanks is 17% more, than FirePro W4190M. | ||
Full Specs
| FirePro V5800 | FirePro W4190M | |
| Architecture | TeraScale 2 | GCN |
| Code name | Juniper | Mars XTX? |
| Type | Workstation | Mobile workstation |
| Release date | 26 April 2010 | 12 November 2015 |
| Pipelines | 800 | 384 |
| Core clock speed | 690 MHz | 825 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 900 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 1,040 million | 950 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 27.60 | 21.60 |
| Floating-point performance | 1,104.0 gflops | 691.2 gflops |
| Length | 229 mm | |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 4000 MHz | 4000 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 64 GB/s | 64 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 11.2 (11_0) | 12 (11_1) |
| Shader Model | 5.0 | 5.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.4 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.2 |
| Vulkan | N/A | 1.2.131 |
| Laptop size | medium sized | |
| AppAcceleration | + | |
| Check Price |