FirePro W4190M vs FirePro W5100
In this comparison between FirePro W4190M and FirePro W5100 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people FirePro W4190M will be the best choice, for others FirePro W5100 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
FirePro W5100
FirePro W4190M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: FirePro W4190M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with FirePro W4190M here:
Main Specs
| FirePro W4190M | FirePro W5100 | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 50 Watt | |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 4 GB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | 4x DisplayPort |
| Check Price |
- FirePro W4190M is connected by PCIe 3.0 x8, and FirePro W5100 uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
- FirePro W5100 has 2 GB more memory, than FirePro W4190M.
- FirePro W4190M is used in Mobile workstations, and FirePro W5100 - in Desktops.
- FirePro W4190M is build with GCN architecture, and FirePro W5100 - with GCN 2.0.
- Core clock speed of FirePro W5100 is 105 MHz higher, than FirePro W4190M.
- FirePro W4190M and FirePro W5100 are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of FirePro W5100 is 2000 MHz higher, than FirePro W4190M.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 3−4 | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 1−2 | 9−10 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 4−5 |
| low / 720p | 14−16 | 30−35 |
| medium / 1080p | 5−6 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro W5100 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 216% more, than FirePro W4190M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 7−8 | 24−27 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 21−24 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 8−9 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 5−6 |
| low / 720p | 18−20 | 50−55 |
| medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 27−30 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro W5100 in Battlefield 5 is 220% more, than FirePro W4190M. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| high / 1080p | 40−45 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| FirePro W4190M and FirePro W5100 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
| low / 768p | 120−130 | 210−220 |
| medium / 768p | 95−100 | 180−190 |
| ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 100−105 |
| QHD / 1440p | 24−27 | 50−55 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 30−33 |
| high / 768p | 70−75 | 140−150 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro W5100 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 91% more, than FirePro W4190M. | ||
| low / 768p | 70−75 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 40−45 |
| medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro W5100 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 8% more, than FirePro W4190M. | ||
| low / 768p | 75−80 | 110−120 |
| medium / 768p | 55−60 | 95−100 |
| ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 65−70 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro W5100 in Dota 2 is 72% more, than FirePro W4190M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 3−4 | 18−20 |
| ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 16−18 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 6−7 |
| low / 720p | 14−16 | 40−45 |
| medium / 1080p | 5−6 | 20−22 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro W5100 in Far Cry 5 is 300% more, than FirePro W4190M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | 24−27 |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 20−22 |
| QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 16−18 |
| low / 720p | 55−60 | 100−110 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 55−60 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro W5100 in Fortnite is 136% more, than FirePro W4190M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 6−7 | 24−27 |
| ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 20−22 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 9−10 |
| low / 720p | 20−22 | 50−55 |
| medium / 1080p | 9−10 | 27−30 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro W5100 in Forza Horizon 4 is 210% more, than FirePro W4190M. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 85−90 |
| medium / 768p | − | 75−80 |
| high / 1080p | 8−9 | 30−35 |
| ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 12−14 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 3−4 |
| medium / 720p | 40−45 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro W5100 in Grand Theft Auto V is 131% more, than FirePro W4190M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 2−3 | 10−11 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 8−9 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 2−3 |
| low / 720p | 7−8 | 30−33 |
| medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 12−14 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro W5100 in Metro Exodus is 350% more, than FirePro W4190M. | ||
| low / 768p | 85−90 | 110−120 |
| high / 1080p | 65−70 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 100−110 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 100−110 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro W5100 in Minecraft is 32% more, than FirePro W4190M. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 21−24 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 18−20 |
| low / 720p | 27−30 | 55−60 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 24−27 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro W5100 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 88% more, than FirePro W4190M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 6−7 | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 10−11 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 7−8 | 27−30 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 16−18 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro W5100 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 200% more, than FirePro W4190M. | ||
| low / 768p | 16−18 | 55−60 |
| medium / 768p | 12−14 | 35−40 |
| high / 1080p | 6−7 | 18−20 |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 10−12 |
| 4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 8−9 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro W5100 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 225% more, than FirePro W4190M. | ||
| low / 768p | 70−75 | 100−110 |
| medium / 768p | 35−40 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 35−40 |
| high / 768p | 30−35 | 50−55 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro W5100 in World of Tanks is 64% more, than FirePro W4190M. | ||
Full Specs
| FirePro W4190M | FirePro W5100 | |
| Architecture | GCN | GCN 2.0 |
| Code name | Mars XTX? | Bonaire |
| Type | Mobile workstation | Workstation |
| Release date | 12 November 2015 | 31 March 2014 |
| Pipelines | 384 | 768 |
| Core clock speed | 825 MHz | 930 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 900 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 950 million | 2,080 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 21.60 | 44.64 |
| Floating-point performance | 691.2 gflops | 1,428 gflops |
| Length | 171 mm | |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 4000 MHz | 6000 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 64 GB/s | 96 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 (11_1) | 12 (12_0) |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | 6.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 2.0 |
| Vulkan | 1.2.131 | 1.2.131 |
| Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 163 Mh/s | |
| Laptop size | medium sized | |
| Form factor | full height / half length | |
| StereoOutput3D | + | |
| DisplayPort count | 4 | |
| Dual-link DVI support | + | |
| AppAcceleration | + | |
| Check Price |