FirePro W4190M vs FireStream 9250
If you are going to buy a new graphics card and are choosing between FirePro W4190M and FireStream 9250, there are a couple of things to consider. Cards with more VRAM in general perform better and allow you to play on higher graphics settings. Size also makes a difference. A model with a large heatsink can occupy up to three expansion slots on a motherboard. Be sure you have enough room in your PC case. When comparing GPUs with different architectures, more processing cores and even higher TFLOPS will not always translate to better performance. To help you decide which GPU you need, we have measured frame rates in a number of popular games. For more on how the FirePro W4190M stacks up against FireStream 9250, check out specs charts below.
FireStream 9250
FirePro W4190M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: FirePro W4190M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with FirePro W4190M here:
Main Specs
| FirePro W4190M | FireStream 9250 | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 150 Watt | |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | 1x 6-pin |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR3 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 1 GB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI |
| Check Price |
- FirePro W4190M is connected by PCIe 3.0 x8, and FireStream 9250 uses PCIe 2.0 x16 interface.
- FirePro W4190M has 1 GB more memory, than FireStream 9250.
- FirePro W4190M is used in Mobile workstations, and FireStream 9250 - in Desktops.
- FirePro W4190M is build with GCN architecture, and FireStream 9250 - with TeraScale.
- Core clock speed of FirePro W4190M is 200 MHz higher, than FireStream 9250.
- FirePro W4190M is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and FireStream 9250 - by 55 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of FirePro W4190M is 2014 MHz higher, than FireStream 9250.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 3−4 | 2−3 |
| ultra / 1080p | 1−2 | 1−2 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
| medium / 1080p | 5−6 | 5−6 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro W4190M in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 20% more, than FireStream 9250. | ||
| high / 1080p | 7−8 | 7−8 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 5−6 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 18−20 | 18−20 |
| medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 7−8 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro W4190M in Battlefield 5 is 11% more, than FireStream 9250. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | 40−45 | 35−40 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| FirePro W4190M and FireStream 9250 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
| low / 768p | 120−130 | 120−130 |
| medium / 768p | 95−100 | 95−100 |
| ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 24−27 | 35−40 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 18−20 |
| high / 768p | 70−75 | 70−75 |
| The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9250 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 4% more, than FirePro W4190M. | ||
| low / 768p | 70−75 | 80−85 |
| ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 18−20 |
| medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 50−55 |
| The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9250 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 13% more, than FirePro W4190M. | ||
| low / 768p | 75−80 | 75−80 |
| medium / 768p | 55−60 | 50−55 |
| ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 27−30 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro W4190M in Dota 2 is 3% more, than FireStream 9250. | ||
| high / 1080p | 3−4 | 3−4 |
| ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 3−4 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 1−2 |
| low / 720p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
| medium / 1080p | 5−6 | 4−5 |
| FirePro W4190M and FireStream 9250 have the same average FPS in Far Cry 5. | ||
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | 10−12 |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 6−7 |
| QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 3−4 |
| low / 720p | 55−60 | 50−55 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro W4190M in Fortnite is 11% more, than FireStream 9250. | ||
| high / 1080p | 6−7 | 8−9 |
| ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 6−7 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 20−22 | 20−22 |
| medium / 1080p | 9−10 | 10−11 |
| The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9250 in Forza Horizon 4 is 10% more, than FirePro W4190M. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | 8−9 | 8−9 |
| ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 3−4 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| medium / 720p | 40−45 | 40−45 |
| The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9250 in Grand Theft Auto V is 4% more, than FirePro W4190M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 2−3 | 2−3 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 7−8 | 7−8 |
| medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 4−5 |
| FirePro W4190M and FireStream 9250 have the same average FPS in Metro Exodus. | ||
| low / 768p | 85−90 | 85−90 |
| high / 1080p | 65−70 | 85−90 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 85−90 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 75−80 |
| The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9250 in Minecraft is 12% more, than FirePro W4190M. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 12−14 |
| low / 720p | 27−30 | 27−30 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
| FirePro W4190M and FireStream 9250 have the same average FPS in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS. | ||
| high / 1080p | 6−7 | 6−7 |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 4−5 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 7−8 | 7−8 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 7−8 |
| FirePro W4190M and FireStream 9250 have the same average FPS in Red Dead Redemption 2. | ||
| low / 768p | 16−18 | 16−18 |
| medium / 768p | 12−14 | 12−14 |
| high / 1080p | 6−7 | 6−7 |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 4−5 |
| 4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 2−3 |
| FirePro W4190M and FireStream 9250 have the same average FPS in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt. | ||
| low / 768p | 70−75 | 80−85 |
| medium / 768p | 35−40 | 40−45 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 16−18 |
| high / 768p | 30−35 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9250 in World of Tanks is 10% more, than FirePro W4190M. | ||
Full Specs
| FirePro W4190M | FireStream 9250 | |
| Architecture | GCN | TeraScale |
| Code name | Mars XTX? | RV770 |
| Type | Mobile workstation | Desktop |
| Release date | 12 November 2015 | 16 June 2008 |
| Pipelines | 384 | 800 |
| Core clock speed | 825 MHz | 625 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 900 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 950 million | 956 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 55 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 21.60 | 25.00 |
| Floating-point performance | 691.2 gflops | 1,000.0 gflops |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 256 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 4000 MHz | 1986 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 64 GB/s | 63.55 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 (11_1) | 10.1 (10_1) |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | 4.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 3.3 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.1 |
| Vulkan | 1.2.131 | N/A |
| Laptop size | medium sized | |
| AppAcceleration | + | |
| Check Price |