FirePro W4190M vs FireStream 9270
Find out if it is worth upgrading your current GPU setup by comparing FirePro W4190M and FireStream 9270. Here you can take a closer look at graphics cards specs, such as core clock speed, memory type and size, display connectors, etc. The price, overall benchmark and gaming performances are usually defining factors when it comes to choosing between FirePro W4190M and FireStream 9270. Make sure that the graphics card has compatible dimensions and will properly fit in your new or current computer case. Also these graphics cards may have different system power recommendations, so take that into consideration and upgrade your PSU if necessary.
FireStream 9270
FirePro W4190M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: FirePro W4190M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with FirePro W4190M here:
Main Specs
| FirePro W4190M | FireStream 9270 | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 160 Watt | |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | 2x 6-pin |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 2 GB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI |
| Check Price |
- FirePro W4190M is connected by PCIe 3.0 x8, and FireStream 9270 uses PCIe 2.0 x16 interface.
- FirePro W4190M and FireStream 9270 have maximum RAM of 2 GB.
- FirePro W4190M is used in Mobile workstations, and FireStream 9270 - in Desktops.
- FirePro W4190M is build with GCN architecture, and FireStream 9270 - with TeraScale.
- Core clock speed of FirePro W4190M is 75 MHz higher, than FireStream 9270.
- FirePro W4190M is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and FireStream 9270 - by 55 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of FirePro W4190M is 400 MHz higher, than FireStream 9270.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 3−4 | 5−6 |
| ultra / 1080p | 1−2 | 2−3 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 2−3 |
| low / 720p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
| medium / 1080p | 5−6 | 7−8 |
| The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9270 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 16% more, than FirePro W4190M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 7−8 | 10−11 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 8−9 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 18−20 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 10−12 |
| The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9270 in Battlefield 5 is 30% more, than FirePro W4190M. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| high / 1080p | 40−45 | 40−45 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| FirePro W4190M and FireStream 9270 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
| low / 768p | 120−130 | 130−140 |
| medium / 768p | 95−100 | 100−110 |
| ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
| QHD / 1440p | 24−27 | 27−30 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 12−14 |
| high / 768p | 70−75 | 75−80 |
| The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9270 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 8% more, than FirePro W4190M. | ||
| low / 768p | 70−75 | 50−55 |
| ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 18−20 |
| medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro W4190M in Cyberpunk 2077 is 15% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
| low / 768p | 75−80 | 80−85 |
| medium / 768p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9270 in Dota 2 is 5% more, than FirePro W4190M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 3−4 | 7−8 |
| ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 5−6 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 5−6 |
| low / 720p | 14−16 | 16−18 |
| medium / 1080p | 5−6 | 8−9 |
| The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9270 in Far Cry 5 is 50% more, than FirePro W4190M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | 7−8 |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 0−1 |
| QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 18−20 |
| FirePro W4190M and FireStream 9270 have the same average FPS in Fortnite. | ||
| high / 1080p | 6−7 | 10−11 |
| ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 8−9 |
| low / 720p | 20−22 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 9−10 | 12−14 |
| The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9270 in Forza Horizon 4 is 25% more, than FirePro W4190M. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | 8−9 | 10−12 |
| ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 5−6 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | − |
| medium / 720p | 40−45 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9270 in Grand Theft Auto V is 16% more, than FirePro W4190M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 2−3 | 3−4 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 1−2 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | − |
| low / 720p | 7−8 | 10−11 |
| medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 5−6 |
| The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9270 in Metro Exodus is 50% more, than FirePro W4190M. | ||
| low / 768p | 85−90 | 90−95 |
| high / 1080p | 65−70 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 80−85 |
| The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9270 in Minecraft is 5% more, than FirePro W4190M. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 6−7 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 2−3 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 27−30 | 27−30 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 10−11 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro W4190M in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 38% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
| high / 1080p | 6−7 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | − |
| low / 720p | 7−8 | 10−11 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 9−10 |
| The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9270 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 42% more, than FirePro W4190M. | ||
| low / 768p | 16−18 | 21−24 |
| medium / 768p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
| high / 1080p | 6−7 | 6−7 |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 4−5 |
| 4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 3−4 |
| The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9270 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 25% more, than FirePro W4190M. | ||
| low / 768p | 70−75 | 75−80 |
| medium / 768p | 35−40 | 40−45 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 18−20 |
| high / 768p | 30−35 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9270 in World of Tanks is 7% more, than FirePro W4190M. | ||
Full Specs
| FirePro W4190M | FireStream 9270 | |
| Architecture | GCN | TeraScale |
| Code name | Mars XTX? | RV770 |
| Type | Mobile workstation | Desktop |
| Release date | 12 November 2015 | 13 November 2008 |
| Pipelines | 384 | 800 |
| Core clock speed | 825 MHz | 750 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 900 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 950 million | 956 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 55 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 21.60 | 30.00 |
| Floating-point performance | 691.2 gflops | 1,200.0 gflops |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 256 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 4000 MHz | 3600 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 64 GB/s | 115.2 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 (11_1) | 10.1 (10_1) |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | 4.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 3.3 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.1 |
| Vulkan | 1.2.131 | N/A |
| Laptop size | medium sized | |
| AppAcceleration | + | |
| Check Price |