FirePro W4190M vs GeForce 8800 GTX
In this comparison between FirePro W4190M and GeForce 8800 GTX you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people FirePro W4190M will be the best choice, for others GeForce 8800 GTX will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
GeForce 8800 GTX
FirePro W4190M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: FirePro W4190M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with FirePro W4190M here:
Main Specs
FirePro W4190M | GeForce 8800 GTX | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 155 Watt | |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 1.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | 2x 6-pin |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR3 |
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 768 MB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | 2x DVI, 1x S-Video |
Check Price |
- FirePro W4190M is connected by PCIe 3.0 x8, and GeForce 8800 GTX uses PCIe 1.0 x16 interface.
- GeForce 8800 GTX has 766 GB more memory, than FirePro W4190M.
- FirePro W4190M is used in Mobile workstations, and GeForce 8800 GTX - in Desktops.
- FirePro W4190M is build with GCN architecture, and GeForce 8800 GTX - with Tesla.
- Core clock speed of FirePro W4190M is 249 MHz higher, than GeForce 8800 GTX.
- FirePro W4190M is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and GeForce 8800 GTX - by 90 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of FirePro W4190M is 3100 MHz higher, than GeForce 8800 GTX.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 3−4 | 0−1 |
ultra / 1080p | 1−2 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 14−16 | 1−2 |
medium / 1080p | 5−6 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W4190M in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 1400% more, than GeForce 8800 GTX. | ||
high / 1080p | 7−8 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 18−20 | 0−1 |
medium / 1080p | 8−9 | − |
low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | 40−45 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce 8800 GTX in Call of Duty: Warzone is 11% more, than FirePro W4190M. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 60−65 |
medium / 768p | 95−100 | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 7−8 |
QHD / 1440p | 24−27 | − |
high / 768p | 70−75 | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W4190M in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 203% more, than GeForce 8800 GTX. | ||
low / 768p | 70−75 | 70−75 |
ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 0−1 |
medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce 8800 GTX in Cyberpunk 2077 is 5% more, than FirePro W4190M. | ||
low / 768p | 75−80 | 45−50 |
medium / 768p | 55−60 | 10−11 |
ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W4190M in Dota 2 is 131% more, than GeForce 8800 GTX. | ||
high / 1080p | 3−4 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | − |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | − |
low / 720p | 14−16 | 0−1 |
medium / 1080p | 5−6 | − |
high / 1080p | 12−14 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | − |
low / 720p | 55−60 | 21−24 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W4190M in Fortnite is 159% more, than GeForce 8800 GTX. | ||
high / 1080p | 6−7 | 0−1 |
ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 20−22 | 0−1 |
medium / 1080p | 9−10 | 0−1 |
low / 768p | 45−50 | 18−20 |
high / 1080p | 8−9 | 0−1 |
ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
medium / 720p | 40−45 | 12−14 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W4190M in Grand Theft Auto V is 181% more, than GeForce 8800 GTX. | ||
high / 1080p | 2−3 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | − |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | − |
low / 720p | 7−8 | 0−1 |
medium / 1080p | 3−4 | − |
low / 768p | 85−90 | 75−80 |
high / 1080p | 65−70 | 27−30 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W4190M in Minecraft is 45% more, than GeForce 8800 GTX. | ||
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | − |
low / 720p | 27−30 | 8−9 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W4190M in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 250% more, than GeForce 8800 GTX. | ||
high / 1080p | 6−7 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | − |
low / 720p | 7−8 | 0−1 |
low / 768p | 16−18 | 0−1 |
medium / 768p | 12−14 | − |
high / 1080p | 6−7 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | − |
4K / 2160p | 1−2 | − |
low / 768p | 70−75 | 45−50 |
medium / 768p | 35−40 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 0−1 |
high / 768p | 30−35 | 12−14 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W4190M in World of Tanks is 88% more, than GeForce 8800 GTX. |
Full Specs
FirePro W4190M | GeForce 8800 GTX | |
Architecture | GCN | Tesla |
Code name | Mars XTX? | G80 |
Type | Mobile workstation | Desktop |
Release date | 12 November 2015 | 8 November 2006 |
Pipelines | 384 | 128 |
Core clock speed | 825 MHz | 576 MHz |
Boost Clock | 900 MHz | |
Transistor count | 950 million | 681 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 90 nm |
Texture fill rate | 21.60 | 36.8 billion/sec |
Floating-point performance | 691.2 gflops | 345.6 gflops |
Length | 270 mm | |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 384 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 4000 MHz | 900 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 64 GB/s | 86.4 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 (11_1) | 11.1 (10_0) |
Shader Model | 5.1 | 4.0 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 3.3 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.1 |
Vulkan | 1.2.131 | N/A |
CUDA | + | |
CUDA cores | 575 | |
SLI options | + | |
Laptop size | medium sized | |
AppAcceleration | + | |
Check Price |