FirePro W4190M vs GeForce GTX 275
If you are going to buy a new graphics card and are choosing between FirePro W4190M and GeForce GTX 275, there are a couple of things to consider. Cards with more VRAM in general perform better and allow you to play on higher graphics settings. Size also makes a difference. A model with a large heatsink can occupy up to three expansion slots on a motherboard. Be sure you have enough room in your PC case. When comparing GPUs with different architectures, more processing cores and even higher TFLOPS will not always translate to better performance. To help you decide which GPU you need, we have measured frame rates in a number of popular games. For more on how the FirePro W4190M stacks up against GeForce GTX 275, check out specs charts below.
FirePro W4190M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: FirePro W4190M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with FirePro W4190M here:
Main Specs
FirePro W4190M
GeForce GTX 275
Power consumption (TDP)
219 Watt
Interface
PCIe 3.0 x8
PCIe 2.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors
None
2x 6-pin
Memory type
GDDR5
GDDR3
Maximum RAM amount
2 GB
896 MB
Display Connectors
No outputs
2x DVI
Check Price
Check Price
FirePro W4190M is connected by PCIe 3.0 x8, and GeForce GTX 275 uses PCIe 2.0 x16 interface.
GeForce GTX 275 has 894 GB more memory, than FirePro W4190M.
FirePro W4190M is used in Mobile workstations, and GeForce GTX 275 - in Desktops.
FirePro W4190M is build with GCN architecture, and GeForce GTX 275 - with Tesla 2.0.
Core clock speed of GeForce GTX 275 is 579 MHz higher, than FirePro W4190M.
FirePro W4190M is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and GeForce GTX 275 - by 55 nm process technology.
Memory clock speed of FirePro W4190M is 2866 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 275.
Game benchmarks
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Battlefield 5
Call of Duty: Warzone
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Cyberpunk 2077
Dota 2
Far Cry 5
Fortnite
Forza Horizon 4
Grand Theft Auto V
Metro Exodus
Minecraft
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS
Red Dead Redemption 2
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
World of Tanks
high / 1080p
3−4
6−7
ultra / 1080p
1−2
4−5
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
low / 720p
14−16
16−18
medium / 1080p
5−6
8−9
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 275 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 50% more, than FirePro W4190M.
high / 1080p
7−8
10−12
ultra / 1080p
5−6
10−11
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
low / 720p
18−20
24−27
medium / 1080p
8−9
12−14
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 275 in Battlefield 5 is 50% more, than FirePro W4190M.
low / 768p
45−50
45−50
high / 1080p
40−45
45−50
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 275 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 4% more, than FirePro W4190M.
low / 768p
120−130
130−140
medium / 768p
95−100
100−110
ultra / 1080p
45−50
50−55
QHD / 1440p
24−27
27−30
4K / 2160p
−
27−30
high / 768p
70−75
75−80
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 275 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 8% more, than FirePro W4190M.
low / 768p
70−75
55−60
ultra / 1080p
20−22
18−20
medium / 1080p
40−45
45−50
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W4190M in Cyberpunk 2077 is 9% more, than GeForce GTX 275.
low / 768p
75−80
75−80
medium / 768p
55−60
55−60
ultra / 1080p
27−30
30−35
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 275 in Dota 2 is 1% more, than FirePro W4190M.
high / 1080p
3−4
8−9
ultra / 1080p
3−4
7−8
4K / 2160p
0−1
3−4
low / 720p
14−16
18−20
medium / 1080p
5−6
8−9
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 275 in Far Cry 5 is 66% more, than FirePro W4190M.
high / 1080p
12−14
14−16
ultra / 1080p
7−8
10−11
QHD / 1440p
4−5
−
low / 720p
55−60
60−65
medium / 1080p
14−16
21−24
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 275 in Fortnite is 17% more, than FirePro W4190M.
high / 1080p
6−7
12−14
ultra / 1080p
6−7
10−12
QHD / 1440p
0−1
1−2
low / 720p
20−22
24−27
medium / 1080p
9−10
12−14
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 275 in Forza Horizon 4 is 50% more, than FirePro W4190M.
low / 768p
45−50
50−55
medium / 768p
−
45−50
high / 1080p
8−9
12−14
ultra / 1080p
3−4
6−7
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
medium / 720p
40−45
−
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 275 in Grand Theft Auto V is 26% more, than FirePro W4190M.
high / 1080p
2−3
4−5
ultra / 1080p
0−1
3−4
4K / 2160p
0−1
0−1
low / 720p
7−8
12−14
medium / 1080p
3−4
6−7
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 275 in Metro Exodus is 100% more, than FirePro W4190M.
low / 768p
85−90
90−95
high / 1080p
65−70
85−90
ultra / 1080p
−
80−85
medium / 1080p
−
90−95
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 275 in Minecraft is 16% more, than FirePro W4190M.
high / 1080p
−
16−18
ultra / 1080p
12−14
14−16
low / 720p
27−30
30−35
medium / 1080p
14−16
18−20
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 275 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 22% more, than FirePro W4190M.
high / 1080p
6−7
−
ultra / 1080p
4−5
7−8
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
low / 720p
7−8
10−12
medium / 1080p
−
10−12
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 275 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 50% more, than FirePro W4190M.
low / 768p
16−18
24−27
medium / 768p
12−14
16−18
high / 1080p
6−7
9−10
ultra / 1080p
4−5
6−7
4K / 2160p
1−2
−
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 275 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 40% more, than FirePro W4190M.
low / 768p
70−75
85−90
medium / 768p
35−40
40−45
ultra / 1080p
16−18
18−20
high / 768p
30−35
35−40
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 275 in World of Tanks is 17% more, than FirePro W4190M.
Full Specs
FirePro W4190M
GeForce GTX 275
Architecture
GCN
Tesla 2.0
Code name
Mars XTX?
GT200B
Type
Mobile workstation
Desktop
Release date
12 November 2015
15 January 2009
Pipelines
384
240
Core clock speed
825 MHz
1404 MHz
Boost Clock
900 MHz
Transistor count
950 million
1,400 million
Manufacturing process technology
28 nm
55 nm
Texture fill rate
21.60
50.6 billion/sec
Floating-point performance
691.2 gflops
673.9 gflops
Length
10.5" (267 mm) (26.7 cm)
Memory bus width
128 Bit
448 Bit
Memory clock speed
4000 MHz
1134 MHz
Memory bandwidth
64 GB/s
127.0 GB/s
Shared memory
-
DirectX
12 (11_1)
11.1 (10_0)
Shader Model
5.1
4.0
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
1.2
1.1
Vulkan
1.2.131
N/A
CUDA
+
CUDA cores
240
Bus support
PCI-E 2.0
Height
4.376" (111 mm) (11.1 cm)
SLI options
+
Multi monitor support
+
Maximum VGA resolution
2048x1536
Audio input for HDMI
S/PDIF
Laptop size
medium sized
AppAcceleration
+
Check Price
Check Price