FirePro W4190M vs GeForce GTX 460 v2
When comparing FirePro W4190M and GeForce GTX 460 v2, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between FirePro W4190M and GeForce GTX 460 v2 is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
GeForce GTX 460 v2
FirePro W4190M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: FirePro W4190M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with FirePro W4190M here:
Main Specs
FirePro W4190M | GeForce GTX 460 v2 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 160 Watt | |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | 2x 6-pin |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 1 GB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | 2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMI |
Check Price |
- FirePro W4190M is connected by PCIe 3.0 x8, and GeForce GTX 460 v2 uses PCIe 2.0 x16 interface.
- FirePro W4190M has 1 GB more memory, than GeForce GTX 460 v2.
- FirePro W4190M is used in Mobile workstations, and GeForce GTX 460 v2 - in Desktops.
- FirePro W4190M is build with GCN architecture, and GeForce GTX 460 v2 - with Fermi 2.0.
- Core clock speed of FirePro W4190M is 46 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 460 v2.
- FirePro W4190M is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and GeForce GTX 460 v2 - by 40 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of GeForce GTX 460 v2 is 8 MHz higher, than FirePro W4190M.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 3−4 | 10−11 |
ultra / 1080p | 1−2 | 6−7 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 14−16 | 21−24 |
medium / 1080p | 5−6 | 12−14 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 v2 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 116% more, than FirePro W4190M. | ||
high / 1080p | 7−8 | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 14−16 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 18−20 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 v2 in Battlefield 5 is 110% more, than FirePro W4190M. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
high / 1080p | 40−45 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
FirePro W4190M and GeForce GTX 460 v2 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 160−170 |
medium / 768p | 95−100 | 130−140 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 70−75 |
QHD / 1440p | 24−27 | 40−45 |
4K / 2160p | − | 30−33 |
high / 768p | 70−75 | 100−110 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 v2 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 42% more, than FirePro W4190M. | ||
low / 768p | 70−75 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 27−30 |
medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W4190M in Cyberpunk 2077 is 2% more, than GeForce GTX 460 v2. | ||
low / 768p | 75−80 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 55−60 | 70−75 |
ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 v2 in Dota 2 is 29% more, than FirePro W4190M. | ||
high / 1080p | 3−4 | 10−12 |
ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 10−12 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 4−5 |
low / 720p | 14−16 | 27−30 |
medium / 1080p | 5−6 | 12−14 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 v2 in Far Cry 5 is 150% more, than FirePro W4190M. | ||
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 18−20 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 12−14 |
QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | − |
low / 720p | 55−60 | 75−80 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 v2 in Fortnite is 52% more, than FirePro W4190M. | ||
high / 1080p | 6−7 | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 14−16 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 4−5 |
low / 720p | 20−22 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 9−10 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 v2 in Forza Horizon 4 is 120% more, than FirePro W4190M. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 65−70 |
medium / 768p | − | 55−60 |
high / 1080p | 8−9 | 18−20 |
ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 8−9 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
medium / 720p | 40−45 | − |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 v2 in Grand Theft Auto V is 63% more, than FirePro W4190M. | ||
high / 1080p | 2−3 | 6−7 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 5−6 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 1−2 |
low / 720p | 7−8 | 18−20 |
medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 8−9 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 v2 in Metro Exodus is 175% more, than FirePro W4190M. | ||
low / 768p | 85−90 | 100−110 |
high / 1080p | 65−70 | − |
ultra / 1080p | − | 90−95 |
medium / 1080p | − | 95−100 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 v2 in Minecraft is 20% more, than FirePro W4190M. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 18−20 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 27−30 | 40−45 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 20−22 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 v2 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 44% more, than FirePro W4190M. | ||
high / 1080p | 6−7 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 8−9 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 7−8 | 18−20 |
medium / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 v2 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 116% more, than FirePro W4190M. | ||
low / 768p | 16−18 | 35−40 |
medium / 768p | 12−14 | 21−24 |
high / 1080p | 6−7 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 8−9 |
4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 7−8 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 v2 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 112% more, than FirePro W4190M. | ||
low / 768p | 70−75 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 35−40 | 50−55 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 24−27 |
high / 768p | 30−35 | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 v2 in World of Tanks is 35% more, than FirePro W4190M. |
Full Specs
FirePro W4190M | GeForce GTX 460 v2 | |
Architecture | GCN | Fermi 2.0 |
Code name | Mars XTX? | GF114 |
Type | Mobile workstation | Desktop |
Release date | 12 November 2015 | 24 September 2011 |
Pipelines | 384 | 336 |
Core clock speed | 825 MHz | 779 MHz |
Boost Clock | 900 MHz | |
Transistor count | 950 million | 1,950 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 40 nm |
Texture fill rate | 21.60 | 43.62 |
Floating-point performance | 691.2 gflops | 1,045.6 gflops |
Length | 210 mm | |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 192 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 4000 MHz | 4008 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 64 GB/s | 96.19 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 (11_1) | 12 (11_0) |
Shader Model | 5.1 | 5.1 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.1 |
Vulkan | 1.2.131 | N/A |
CUDA | 2.1 | |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 75 Mh/s | |
Laptop size | medium sized | |
AppAcceleration | + | |
Check Price |