FirePro W4190M vs GeForce GTX 950A
In this comparison between FirePro W4190M and GeForce GTX 950A you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people FirePro W4190M will be the best choice, for others GeForce GTX 950A will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
GeForce GTX 950A
FirePro W4190M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: FirePro W4190M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with FirePro W4190M here:
Main Specs
FirePro W4190M | GeForce GTX 950A | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 75 Watt | |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | MXM-B (3.0) |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | DDR3 |
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 2 GB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Check Price |
- FirePro W4190M is connected by PCIe 3.0 x8, and GeForce GTX 950A uses MXM-B (3.0) interface.
- FirePro W4190M and GeForce GTX 950A have maximum RAM of 2 GB.
- FirePro W4190M is used in Mobile workstations, and GeForce GTX 950A - in Desktops.
- FirePro W4190M is build with GCN architecture, and GeForce GTX 950A - with Maxwell.
- Core clock speed of GeForce GTX 950A is 168 MHz higher, than FirePro W4190M.
- FirePro W4190M and GeForce GTX 950A are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of FirePro W4190M is 1998 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 950A.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 3−4 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 1−2 | 7−8 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 2−3 |
low / 720p | 14−16 | 24−27 |
medium / 1080p | 5−6 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 950A in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 150% more, than FirePro W4190M. | ||
high / 1080p | 7−8 | 20−22 |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 16−18 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 3−4 |
low / 720p | 18−20 | 40−45 |
medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 950A in Battlefield 5 is 150% more, than FirePro W4190M. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
high / 1080p | 40−45 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
FirePro W4190M and GeForce GTX 950A have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 190−200 |
medium / 768p | 95−100 | 150−160 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 80−85 |
QHD / 1440p | 24−27 | 45−50 |
4K / 2160p | − | 30−33 |
high / 768p | 70−75 | 120−130 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 950A in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 65% more, than FirePro W4190M. | ||
low / 768p | 70−75 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 45−50 |
FirePro W4190M and GeForce GTX 950A have the same average FPS in Cyberpunk 2077. | ||
low / 768p | 75−80 | 100−110 |
medium / 768p | 55−60 | 80−85 |
ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 50−55 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 950A in Dota 2 is 48% more, than FirePro W4190M. | ||
high / 1080p | 3−4 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 12−14 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 5−6 |
low / 720p | 14−16 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | 5−6 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 950A in Far Cry 5 is 200% more, than FirePro W4190M. | ||
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 16−18 |
QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | − |
low / 720p | 55−60 | 85−90 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 950A in Fortnite is 82% more, than FirePro W4190M. | ||
high / 1080p | 6−7 | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 16−18 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 6−7 |
low / 720p | 20−22 | 40−45 |
medium / 1080p | 9−10 | 24−27 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 950A in Forza Horizon 4 is 160% more, than FirePro W4190M. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 75−80 |
medium / 768p | − | 65−70 |
high / 1080p | 8−9 | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 10−11 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 1−2 |
medium / 720p | 40−45 | − |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 950A in Grand Theft Auto V is 94% more, than FirePro W4190M. | ||
high / 1080p | 2−3 | 8−9 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 6−7 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 2−3 |
low / 720p | 7−8 | 21−24 |
medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 10−11 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 950A in Metro Exodus is 225% more, than FirePro W4190M. | ||
low / 768p | 85−90 | 100−110 |
high / 1080p | 65−70 | − |
ultra / 1080p | − | 95−100 |
medium / 1080p | − | 100−110 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 950A in Minecraft is 20% more, than FirePro W4190M. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 20−22 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 16−18 |
low / 720p | 27−30 | 45−50 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 950A in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 61% more, than FirePro W4190M. | ||
high / 1080p | 6−7 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 9−10 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 7−8 | 21−24 |
medium / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 950A in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 150% more, than FirePro W4190M. | ||
low / 768p | 16−18 | 45−50 |
medium / 768p | 12−14 | 27−30 |
high / 1080p | 6−7 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 9−10 |
4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 7−8 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 950A in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 162% more, than FirePro W4190M. | ||
low / 768p | 70−75 | 95−100 |
medium / 768p | 35−40 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 30−33 |
high / 768p | 30−35 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 950A in World of Tanks is 48% more, than FirePro W4190M. |
Full Specs
FirePro W4190M | GeForce GTX 950A | |
Architecture | GCN | Maxwell |
Code name | Mars XTX? | GM107 |
Type | Mobile workstation | Desktop |
Release date | 12 November 2015 | 13 March 2015 |
Pipelines | 384 | 640 |
Core clock speed | 825 MHz | 993 MHz |
Boost Clock | 900 MHz | 1124 MHz |
Transistor count | 950 million | 1,870 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Texture fill rate | 21.60 | 44.96 |
Floating-point performance | 691.2 gflops | 1,271 gflops |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 4000 MHz | 2002 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 64 GB/s | 32.03 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 (11_1) | 12 (11_0) |
Shader Model | 5.1 | 5.1 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.2 |
Vulkan | 1.2.131 | 1.1.126 |
CUDA | 5.0 | |
Laptop size | medium sized | |
AppAcceleration | + | |
Check Price |
Similar compares
- FirePro W4190M vs HD Graphics 630
- FirePro W4190M vs UHD Graphics 630
- GeForce GTX 950A vs HD Graphics 630
- GeForce GTX 950A vs UHD Graphics 630
- FirePro W4190M vs Radeon R9 M470
- FirePro W4190M vs Iris Plus Graphics G4 Ice Lake 48 EU
- GeForce GTX 950A vs Radeon R9 M470
- GeForce GTX 950A vs Iris Plus Graphics G4 Ice Lake 48 EU