FirePro W4190M vs GRID K140Q
In this comparison between FirePro W4190M and GRID K140Q you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people FirePro W4190M will be the best choice, for others GRID K140Q will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
GRID K140Q
FirePro W4190M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: FirePro W4190M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with FirePro W4190M here:
Main Specs
| FirePro W4190M | GRID K140Q | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 130 Watt | |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | DDR3 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 1 GB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- FirePro W4190M is connected by PCIe 3.0 x8, and GRID K140Q uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
- FirePro W4190M has 1 GB more memory, than GRID K140Q.
- FirePro W4190M is used in Mobile workstations, and GRID K140Q - in Desktops.
- FirePro W4190M is build with GCN architecture, and GRID K140Q - with Kepler.
- Core clock speed of GRID K140Q is 25 MHz higher, than FirePro W4190M.
- FirePro W4190M and GRID K140Q are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of FirePro W4190M is 2218 MHz higher, than GRID K140Q.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 3−4 | 0−1 |
| ultra / 1080p | 1−2 | 0−1 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 14−16 | 9−10 |
| medium / 1080p | 5−6 | 1−2 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro W4190M in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 100% more, than GRID K140Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 7−8 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 1−2 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 18−20 | 8−9 |
| medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 2−3 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro W4190M in Battlefield 5 is 175% more, than GRID K140Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | 40−45 | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K140Q in Call of Duty: Warzone is 11% more, than FirePro W4190M. | ||
| low / 768p | 120−130 | 100−110 |
| medium / 768p | 95−100 | 75−80 |
| ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 30−33 |
| QHD / 1440p | 24−27 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 9−10 |
| high / 768p | 70−75 | 50−55 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro W4190M in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 28% more, than GRID K140Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 70−75 | 70−75 |
| ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 10−12 |
| medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro W4190M in Cyberpunk 2077 is 4% more, than GRID K140Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 75−80 | 65−70 |
| medium / 768p | 55−60 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 12−14 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro W4190M in Dota 2 is 38% more, than GRID K140Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 3−4 | 0−1 |
| ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 14−16 | 6−7 |
| medium / 1080p | 5−6 | 1−2 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro W4190M in Far Cry 5 is 150% more, than GRID K140Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 55−60 | 40−45 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 2−3 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro W4190M in Fortnite is 63% more, than GRID K140Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 6−7 | 0−1 |
| ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 20−22 | 10−12 |
| medium / 1080p | 9−10 | 3−4 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro W4190M in Forza Horizon 4 is 114% more, than GRID K140Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 35−40 |
| high / 1080p | 8−9 | 0−1 |
| ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| medium / 720p | 40−45 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro W4190M in Grand Theft Auto V is 28% more, than GRID K140Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 2−3 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 7−8 | 0−1 |
| medium / 1080p | 3−4 | − |
| low / 768p | 85−90 | 85−90 |
| high / 1080p | 65−70 | 50−55 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro W4190M in Minecraft is 10% more, than GRID K140Q. | ||
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 12−14 |
| low / 720p | 27−30 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro W4190M in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 12% more, than GRID K140Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 6−7 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 7−8 | 1−2 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro W4190M in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 600% more, than GRID K140Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 16−18 | 3−4 |
| medium / 768p | 12−14 | − |
| high / 1080p | 6−7 | 1−2 |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro W4190M in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 450% more, than GRID K140Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 70−75 | 65−70 |
| medium / 768p | 35−40 | 30−35 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 10−11 |
| high / 768p | 30−35 | 24−27 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro W4190M in World of Tanks is 14% more, than GRID K140Q. | ||
Full Specs
| FirePro W4190M | GRID K140Q | |
| Architecture | GCN | Kepler |
| Code name | Mars XTX? | GK107 |
| Type | Mobile workstation | Workstation |
| Release date | 12 November 2015 | 28 June 2013 |
| Pipelines | 384 | 192 |
| Core clock speed | 825 MHz | 850 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 900 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 950 million | 1,270 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 21.60 | 13.60 |
| Floating-point performance | 691.2 gflops | 326.4 gflops |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 4000 MHz | 1782 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 64 GB/s | 28.51 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 (11_1) | 12 (11_0) |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | 5.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.2.131 | 1.1.126 |
| CUDA | 3.0 | |
| Laptop size | medium sized | |
| AppAcceleration | + | |
| Check Price |