FirePro W4190M vs GRID K220Q
When choosing between FirePro W4190M and GRID K220Q, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between FirePro W4190M and GRID K220Q.
GRID K220Q
FirePro W4190M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: FirePro W4190M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with FirePro W4190M here:
Main Specs
| FirePro W4190M | GRID K220Q | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 225 Watt | |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 512 MB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- FirePro W4190M is connected by PCIe 3.0 x8, and GRID K220Q uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
- GRID K220Q has 510 GB more memory, than FirePro W4190M.
- FirePro W4190M is used in Mobile workstations, and GRID K220Q - in Desktops.
- FirePro W4190M is build with GCN architecture, and GRID K220Q - with Kepler.
- Core clock speed of FirePro W4190M is 80 MHz higher, than GRID K220Q.
- FirePro W4190M and GRID K220Q are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of GRID K220Q is 1000 MHz higher, than FirePro W4190M.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 3−4 | 1−2 |
| ultra / 1080p | 1−2 | 0−1 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 14−16 | 10−12 |
| medium / 1080p | 5−6 | 2−3 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro W4190M in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 60% more, than GRID K220Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 7−8 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 3−4 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 18−20 | 12−14 |
| medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 4−5 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro W4190M in Battlefield 5 is 57% more, than GRID K220Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | 40−45 | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K220Q in Call of Duty: Warzone is 11% more, than FirePro W4190M. | ||
| low / 768p | 120−130 | 110−120 |
| medium / 768p | 95−100 | 85−90 |
| ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 35−40 |
| QHD / 1440p | 24−27 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 10−11 |
| high / 768p | 70−75 | 60−65 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro W4190M in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 13% more, than GRID K220Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 70−75 | 70−75 |
| ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 14−16 |
| medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 45−50 |
| FirePro W4190M and GRID K220Q have the same average FPS in Cyberpunk 2077. | ||
| low / 768p | 75−80 | 70−75 |
| medium / 768p | 55−60 | 40−45 |
| ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro W4190M in Dota 2 is 22% more, than GRID K220Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 3−4 | 2−3 |
| ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 2−3 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 14−16 | 9−10 |
| medium / 1080p | 5−6 | 3−4 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro W4190M in Far Cry 5 is 50% more, than GRID K220Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 5−6 |
| QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 1−2 |
| low / 720p | 55−60 | 45−50 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 7−8 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro W4190M in Fortnite is 40% more, than GRID K220Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 6−7 | 3−4 |
| ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 20−22 | 14−16 |
| medium / 1080p | 9−10 | 5−6 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro W4190M in Forza Horizon 4 is 50% more, than GRID K220Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 40−45 |
| high / 1080p | 8−9 | 3−4 |
| ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 2−3 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| medium / 720p | 40−45 | 35−40 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro W4190M in Grand Theft Auto V is 19% more, than GRID K220Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 2−3 | 1−2 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 7−8 | 3−4 |
| medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 2−3 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro W4190M in Metro Exodus is 100% more, than GRID K220Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 85−90 | 85−90 |
| high / 1080p | 65−70 | 55−60 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro W4190M in Minecraft is 6% more, than GRID K220Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 12−14 |
| low / 720p | 27−30 | 24−27 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro W4190M in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 5% more, than GRID K220Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 6−7 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 3−4 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 7−8 | 4−5 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro W4190M in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 50% more, than GRID K220Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 16−18 | 7−8 |
| medium / 768p | 12−14 | 6−7 |
| high / 1080p | 6−7 | 3−4 |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro W4190M in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 140% more, than GRID K220Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 70−75 | 70−75 |
| medium / 768p | 35−40 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 12−14 |
| high / 768p | 30−35 | 30−33 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro W4190M in World of Tanks is 2% more, than GRID K220Q. | ||
Full Specs
| FirePro W4190M | GRID K220Q | |
| Architecture | GCN | Kepler |
| Code name | Mars XTX? | GK104 |
| Type | Mobile workstation | Workstation |
| Release date | 12 November 2015 | 2 July 2014 |
| Pipelines | 384 | 1536 |
| Core clock speed | 825 MHz | 745 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 900 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 950 million | 3,540 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 21.60 | 95.36 |
| Floating-point performance | 691.2 gflops | 2,289 gflops |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 256 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 4000 MHz | 5000 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 64 GB/s | 160.0 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 (11_1) | 12 (11_0) |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | 5.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.2.131 | 1.1.126 |
| CUDA | 3.0 | |
| Laptop size | medium sized | |
| AppAcceleration | + | |
| Check Price |