FirePro W4190M vs GRID K260Q
Find out if it is worth upgrading your current GPU setup by comparing FirePro W4190M and GRID K260Q. Here you can take a closer look at graphics cards specs, such as core clock speed, memory type and size, display connectors, etc. The price, overall benchmark and gaming performances are usually defining factors when it comes to choosing between FirePro W4190M and GRID K260Q. Make sure that the graphics card has compatible dimensions and will properly fit in your new or current computer case. Also these graphics cards may have different system power recommendations, so take that into consideration and upgrade your PSU if necessary.
GRID K260Q
FirePro W4190M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: FirePro W4190M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with FirePro W4190M here:
Main Specs
| FirePro W4190M | GRID K260Q | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 225 Watt | |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 2 GB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- FirePro W4190M is connected by PCIe 3.0 x8, and GRID K260Q uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
- FirePro W4190M and GRID K260Q have maximum RAM of 2 GB.
- FirePro W4190M is used in Mobile workstations, and GRID K260Q - in Desktops.
- FirePro W4190M is build with GCN architecture, and GRID K260Q - with Kepler.
- Core clock speed of FirePro W4190M is 80 MHz higher, than GRID K260Q.
- FirePro W4190M and GRID K260Q are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of GRID K260Q is 1000 MHz higher, than FirePro W4190M.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 3−4 | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 1−2 | 9−10 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 3−4 |
| low / 720p | 14−16 | 30−35 |
| medium / 1080p | 5−6 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 216% more, than FirePro W4190M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 7−8 | 24−27 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 21−24 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 7−8 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 5−6 |
| low / 720p | 18−20 | 50−55 |
| medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 27−30 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Battlefield 5 is 220% more, than FirePro W4190M. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| high / 1080p | 40−45 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| FirePro W4190M and GRID K260Q have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
| low / 768p | 120−130 | 210−220 |
| medium / 768p | 95−100 | 180−190 |
| ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 95−100 |
| QHD / 1440p | 24−27 | 50−55 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 30−33 |
| high / 768p | 70−75 | 140−150 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 90% more, than FirePro W4190M. | ||
| low / 768p | 70−75 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 40−45 |
| medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Cyberpunk 2077 is 8% more, than FirePro W4190M. | ||
| low / 768p | 75−80 | 110−120 |
| medium / 768p | 55−60 | 90−95 |
| ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 60−65 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Dota 2 is 66% more, than FirePro W4190M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 3−4 | 18−20 |
| ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 16−18 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 6−7 |
| low / 720p | 14−16 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | 5−6 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Far Cry 5 is 283% more, than FirePro W4190M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | 24−27 |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 18−20 |
| QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 16−18 |
| low / 720p | 55−60 | 95−100 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 50−55 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Fortnite is 121% more, than FirePro W4190M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 6−7 | 24−27 |
| ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 20−22 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 9−10 |
| low / 720p | 20−22 | 50−55 |
| medium / 1080p | 9−10 | 27−30 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Forza Horizon 4 is 210% more, than FirePro W4190M. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 85−90 |
| medium / 768p | − | 75−80 |
| high / 1080p | 8−9 | 30−33 |
| ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 12−14 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 3−4 |
| medium / 720p | 40−45 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Grand Theft Auto V is 131% more, than FirePro W4190M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 2−3 | 9−10 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 7−8 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 2−3 |
| low / 720p | 7−8 | 27−30 |
| medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 12−14 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Metro Exodus is 325% more, than FirePro W4190M. | ||
| low / 768p | 85−90 | 110−120 |
| high / 1080p | 65−70 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 100−110 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 100−110 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Minecraft is 32% more, than FirePro W4190M. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 21−24 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 18−20 |
| low / 720p | 27−30 | 55−60 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 24−27 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 88% more, than FirePro W4190M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 6−7 | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 9−10 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 7−8 | 27−30 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 16−18 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 183% more, than FirePro W4190M. | ||
| low / 768p | 16−18 | 55−60 |
| medium / 768p | 12−14 | 30−35 |
| high / 1080p | 6−7 | 18−20 |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 10−12 |
| 4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 8−9 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 212% more, than FirePro W4190M. | ||
| low / 768p | 70−75 | 100−110 |
| medium / 768p | 35−40 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 35−40 |
| high / 768p | 30−35 | 50−55 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in World of Tanks is 64% more, than FirePro W4190M. | ||
Full Specs
| FirePro W4190M | GRID K260Q | |
| Architecture | GCN | Kepler |
| Code name | Mars XTX? | GK104 |
| Type | Mobile workstation | Workstation |
| Release date | 12 November 2015 | 28 June 2013 |
| Pipelines | 384 | 1536 |
| Core clock speed | 825 MHz | 745 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 900 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 950 million | 3,540 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 21.60 | 95.36 |
| Floating-point performance | 691.2 gflops | 2,289 gflops |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 256 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 4000 MHz | 5000 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 64 GB/s | 160.0 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 (11_1) | 12 (11_0) |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | 5.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.2.131 | 1.1.126 |
| CUDA | 3.0 | |
| Laptop size | medium sized | |
| AppAcceleration | + | |
| Check Price |