FirePro W4190M vs GRID M6 8Q
When choosing between FirePro W4190M and GRID M6 8Q, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between FirePro W4190M and GRID M6 8Q.
GRID M6 8Q
FirePro W4190M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: FirePro W4190M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with FirePro W4190M here:
Main Specs
FirePro W4190M | GRID M6 8Q | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 100 Watt | |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 8 GB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Check Price |
- FirePro W4190M is connected by PCIe 3.0 x8, and GRID M6 8Q uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
- GRID M6 8Q has 6 GB more memory, than FirePro W4190M.
- FirePro W4190M is used in Mobile workstations, and GRID M6 8Q - in Desktops.
- FirePro W4190M is build with GCN architecture, and GRID M6 8Q - with Maxwell 2.0.
- Core clock speed of FirePro W4190M is 103 MHz higher, than GRID M6 8Q.
- FirePro W4190M and GRID M6 8Q are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of GRID M6 8Q is 1012 MHz higher, than FirePro W4190M.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 3−4 | 18−20 |
ultra / 1080p | 1−2 | 10−11 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 5−6 |
4K / 2160p | − | 4−5 |
low / 720p | 14−16 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 5−6 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M6 8Q in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 266% more, than FirePro W4190M. | ||
high / 1080p | 7−8 | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 24−27 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 8−9 |
4K / 2160p | − | 6−7 |
low / 720p | 18−20 | 60−65 |
medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M6 8Q in Battlefield 5 is 270% more, than FirePro W4190M. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | 40−45 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M6 8Q in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than FirePro W4190M. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 220−230 |
medium / 768p | 95−100 | 190−200 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 110−120 |
QHD / 1440p | 24−27 | 75−80 |
4K / 2160p | − | 40−45 |
high / 768p | 70−75 | 160−170 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M6 8Q in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 112% more, than FirePro W4190M. | ||
low / 768p | 70−75 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 45−50 |
medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M6 8Q in Cyberpunk 2077 is 22% more, than FirePro W4190M. | ||
low / 768p | 75−80 | 110−120 |
medium / 768p | 55−60 | 100−110 |
ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 75−80 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M6 8Q in Dota 2 is 83% more, than FirePro W4190M. | ||
high / 1080p | 3−4 | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 20−22 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 18−20 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 7−8 |
low / 720p | 14−16 | 45−50 |
medium / 1080p | 5−6 | 24−27 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M6 8Q in Far Cry 5 is 383% more, than FirePro W4190M. | ||
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 55−60 | 110−120 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 65−70 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M6 8Q in Fortnite is 157% more, than FirePro W4190M. | ||
high / 1080p | 6−7 | 30−35 |
ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 24−27 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 10−12 |
low / 720p | 20−22 | 60−65 |
medium / 1080p | 9−10 | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M6 8Q in Forza Horizon 4 is 290% more, than FirePro W4190M. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 95−100 |
medium / 768p | − | 85−90 |
high / 1080p | 8−9 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 14−16 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 5−6 |
medium / 720p | 40−45 | − |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M6 8Q in Grand Theft Auto V is 163% more, than FirePro W4190M. | ||
high / 1080p | 2−3 | 10−12 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 9−10 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 2−3 |
low / 720p | 7−8 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M6 8Q in Metro Exodus is 425% more, than FirePro W4190M. | ||
low / 768p | 85−90 | 110−120 |
high / 1080p | 65−70 | − |
medium / 1080p | − | 110−120 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M6 8Q in Minecraft is 32% more, than FirePro W4190M. | ||
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 27−30 | 65−70 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M6 8Q in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 83% more, than FirePro W4190M. | ||
high / 1080p | 6−7 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 9−10 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 7−8 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | − | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M6 8Q in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 233% more, than FirePro W4190M. | ||
low / 768p | 16−18 | 65−70 |
medium / 768p | 12−14 | 40−45 |
high / 1080p | 6−7 | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 12−14 |
4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 7−8 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M6 8Q in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 275% more, than FirePro W4190M. | ||
low / 768p | 70−75 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 35−40 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 35−40 |
high / 768p | 30−35 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M6 8Q in World of Tanks is 58% more, than FirePro W4190M. |
Full Specs
FirePro W4190M | GRID M6 8Q | |
Architecture | GCN | Maxwell 2.0 |
Code name | Mars XTX? | GM204 |
Type | Mobile workstation | Workstation |
Release date | 12 November 2015 | 30 August 2015 |
Pipelines | 384 | 1536 |
Core clock speed | 825 MHz | 722 MHz |
Boost Clock | 900 MHz | |
Transistor count | 950 million | 5,200 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Texture fill rate | 21.60 | 69.31 |
Floating-point performance | 691.2 gflops | 2,218 gflops |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 4000 MHz | 5012 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 64 GB/s | 160.4 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 (11_1) | 12 (12_1) |
Shader Model | 5.1 | 6.4 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.2 |
Vulkan | 1.2.131 | 1.1.126 |
CUDA | 5.2 | |
Laptop size | medium sized | |
AppAcceleration | + | |
Check Price |