FirePro W4190M vs GRID M60 1Q
In this comparison between FirePro W4190M and GRID M60 1Q you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people FirePro W4190M will be the best choice, for others GRID M60 1Q will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
GRID M60 1Q
FirePro W4190M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: FirePro W4190M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with FirePro W4190M here:
Main Specs
| FirePro W4190M | GRID M60 1Q | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 225 Watt | |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | 1x 8-pin |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 1 GB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- FirePro W4190M is connected by PCIe 3.0 x8, and GRID M60 1Q uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
- FirePro W4190M has 1 GB more memory, than GRID M60 1Q.
- FirePro W4190M is used in Mobile workstations, and GRID M60 1Q - in Desktops.
- FirePro W4190M is build with GCN architecture, and GRID M60 1Q - with Maxwell 2.0.
- Core clock speed of FirePro W4190M is 268 MHz higher, than GRID M60 1Q.
- FirePro W4190M and GRID M60 1Q are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of GRID M60 1Q is 1012 MHz higher, than FirePro W4190M.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 3−4 | 21−24 |
| ultra / 1080p | 1−2 | 12−14 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 7−8 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 5−6 |
| low / 720p | 14−16 | 40−45 |
| medium / 1080p | 5−6 | 27−30 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 1Q in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 333% more, than FirePro W4190M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 7−8 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 30−33 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 14−16 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 9−10 |
| low / 720p | 18−20 | 70−75 |
| medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 35−40 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 1Q in Battlefield 5 is 340% more, than FirePro W4190M. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | 40−45 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 1Q in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than FirePro W4190M. | ||
| low / 768p | 120−130 | 230−240 |
| medium / 768p | 95−100 | 200−210 |
| ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 120−130 |
| QHD / 1440p | 24−27 | 100−105 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 55−60 |
| high / 768p | 70−75 | 170−180 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 1Q in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 130% more, than FirePro W4190M. | ||
| low / 768p | 70−75 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 50−55 |
| medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 55−60 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 1Q in Cyberpunk 2077 is 26% more, than FirePro W4190M. | ||
| low / 768p | 75−80 | 120−130 |
| medium / 768p | 55−60 | 110−120 |
| ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 80−85 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 1Q in Dota 2 is 98% more, than FirePro W4190M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 3−4 | 27−30 |
| ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 24−27 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 20−22 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 8−9 |
| low / 720p | 14−16 | 55−60 |
| medium / 1080p | 5−6 | 27−30 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 1Q in Far Cry 5 is 483% more, than FirePro W4190M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 27−30 |
| QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 16−18 |
| low / 720p | 55−60 | 130−140 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 75−80 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 1Q in Fortnite is 210% more, than FirePro W4190M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 6−7 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 27−30 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 16−18 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 20−22 | 70−75 |
| medium / 1080p | 9−10 | 40−45 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 1Q in Forza Horizon 4 is 350% more, than FirePro W4190M. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 100−110 |
| medium / 768p | − | 95−100 |
| high / 1080p | 8−9 | 40−45 |
| ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 18−20 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 8−9 |
| medium / 720p | 40−45 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 1Q in Grand Theft Auto V is 189% more, than FirePro W4190M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 2−3 | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 10−12 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 10−12 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 3−4 |
| low / 720p | 7−8 | 40−45 |
| medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 1Q in Metro Exodus is 525% more, than FirePro W4190M. | ||
| low / 768p | 85−90 | 120−130 |
| high / 1080p | 65−70 | − |
| medium / 1080p | − | 110−120 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 1Q in Minecraft is 43% more, than FirePro W4190M. | ||
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 27−30 | 75−80 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 1Q in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 105% more, than FirePro W4190M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 6−7 | 16−18 |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 10−12 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 2−3 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 2−3 |
| low / 720p | 7−8 | 40−45 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 21−24 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 1Q in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 283% more, than FirePro W4190M. | ||
| low / 768p | 16−18 | 80−85 |
| medium / 768p | 12−14 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | 6−7 | 27−30 |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 14−16 |
| 4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 9−10 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 1Q in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 362% more, than FirePro W4190M. | ||
| low / 768p | 70−75 | 90−95 |
| medium / 768p | 35−40 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 40−45 |
| high / 768p | 30−35 | 55−60 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 1Q in World of Tanks is 61% more, than FirePro W4190M. | ||
Full Specs
| FirePro W4190M | GRID M60 1Q | |
| Architecture | GCN | Maxwell 2.0 |
| Code name | Mars XTX? | GM204 |
| Type | Mobile workstation | Workstation |
| Release date | 12 November 2015 | 30 August 2015 |
| Pipelines | 384 | 2048 |
| Core clock speed | 825 MHz | 557 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 900 MHz | 1178 MHz |
| Transistor count | 950 million | 5,200 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 21.60 | 150.8 |
| Floating-point performance | 691.2 gflops | 4,833 gflops |
| Length | 267 mm | |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 256 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 4000 MHz | 5012 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 64 GB/s | 160.4 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 (11_1) | 12 (12_1) |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | 6.4 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.2.131 | 1.1.126 |
| CUDA | 5.2 | |
| Laptop size | medium sized | |
| AppAcceleration | + | |
| Check Price |