FirePro W4190M vs Iris Xe Graphics G7
In this comparison between FirePro W4190M and Iris Xe Graphics G7 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people FirePro W4190M will be the best choice, for others Iris Xe Graphics G7 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
FirePro W4190M and Iris Xe Graphics G7 are Laptop Graphics Cards
Note: FirePro W4190M and Iris Xe Graphics G7 are only used in laptop graphics. They have lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with FirePro W4190M or Iris Xe Graphics G7 here:
Main Specs
FirePro W4190M
Iris Xe Graphics G7
Interface
PCIe 3.0 x8
Supplementary power connectors
None
Memory type
GDDR5
DDR4
Maximum RAM amount
2 GB
Display Connectors
No outputs
Check Price
Check Price
FirePro W4190M is used in Mobile workstations, and Iris Xe Graphics G7 - in Laptops.
FirePro W4190M is build with GCN architecture, and Iris Xe Graphics G7 - with Gen. 11 Ice Lake.
FirePro W4190M is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Iris Xe Graphics G7 - by 10 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Battlefield 5
Call of Duty: Warzone
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Cyberpunk 2077
Dota 2
Far Cry 5
Fortnite
Forza Horizon 4
Grand Theft Auto V
Metro Exodus
Minecraft
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS
Red Dead Redemption 2
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
World of Tanks
high / 1080p
3−4
16−18
ultra / 1080p
1−2
9−10
QHD / 1440p
0−1
3−4
low / 720p
14−16
30−35
medium / 1080p
5−6
20−22
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 233% more, than FirePro W4190M.
high / 1080p
7−8
24−27
ultra / 1080p
5−6
21−24
QHD / 1440p
0−1
5−6
low / 720p
18−20
55−60
medium / 1080p
8−9
27−30
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 in Battlefield 5 is 230% more, than FirePro W4190M.
low / 768p
45−50
50−55
high / 1080p
40−45
45−50
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 11% more, than FirePro W4190M.
low / 768p
120−130
210−220
medium / 768p
95−100
180−190
ultra / 1080p
45−50
100−110
QHD / 1440p
24−27
55−60
4K / 2160p
−
30−33
high / 768p
70−75
140−150
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 93% more, than FirePro W4190M.
low / 768p
70−75
60−65
ultra / 1080p
20−22
40−45
medium / 1080p
40−45
55−60
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 20% more, than FirePro W4190M.
low / 768p
75−80
110−120
medium / 768p
55−60
95−100
ultra / 1080p
27−30
65−70
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 in Dota 2 is 72% more, than FirePro W4190M.
high / 1080p
3−4
18−20
ultra / 1080p
3−4
18−20
QHD / 1440p
−
16−18
4K / 2160p
0−1
6−7
low / 720p
14−16
40−45
medium / 1080p
5−6
21−24
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 in Far Cry 5 is 316% more, than FirePro W4190M.
high / 1080p
12−14
24−27
ultra / 1080p
7−8
20−22
QHD / 1440p
4−5
12−14
low / 720p
55−60
100−110
medium / 1080p
14−16
55−60
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 in Fortnite is 131% more, than FirePro W4190M.
high / 1080p
6−7
27−30
ultra / 1080p
6−7
21−24
QHD / 1440p
0−1
9−10
low / 720p
20−22
55−60
medium / 1080p
9−10
30−35
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 in Forza Horizon 4 is 250% more, than FirePro W4190M.
low / 768p
45−50
90−95
medium / 768p
−
80−85
high / 1080p
8−9
30−35
ultra / 1080p
3−4
12−14
QHD / 1440p
0−1
3−4
medium / 720p
40−45
−
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 in Grand Theft Auto V is 142% more, than FirePro W4190M.
high / 1080p
2−3
10−11
ultra / 1080p
0−1
8−9
4K / 2160p
0−1
1−2
low / 720p
7−8
30−35
medium / 1080p
3−4
14−16
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 in Metro Exodus is 375% more, than FirePro W4190M.
low / 768p
85−90
110−120
high / 1080p
65−70
−
medium / 1080p
−
110−120
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 in Minecraft is 32% more, than FirePro W4190M.
ultra / 1080p
12−14
14−16
low / 720p
27−30
60−65
medium / 1080p
14−16
18−20
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 77% more, than FirePro W4190M.
high / 1080p
6−7
12−14
ultra / 1080p
4−5
8−9
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
low / 720p
7−8
30−35
medium / 1080p
−
16−18
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 200% more, than FirePro W4190M.
low / 768p
16−18
55−60
medium / 768p
12−14
35−40
high / 1080p
6−7
20−22
ultra / 1080p
4−5
10−12
4K / 2160p
1−2
6−7
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 225% more, than FirePro W4190M.
low / 768p
70−75
90−95
medium / 768p
35−40
60−65
ultra / 1080p
16−18
35−40
high / 768p
30−35
50−55
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 in World of Tanks is 56% more, than FirePro W4190M.
Full Specs
FirePro W4190M
Iris Xe Graphics G7
Architecture
GCN
Gen. 11 Ice Lake
Code name
Mars XTX?
Tiger Lake Xe
Type
Mobile workstation
Laptop
Release date
12 November 2015
15 August 2020
Pipelines
384
96
Core clock speed
825 MHz
Boost Clock
900 MHz
Transistor count
950 million
Manufacturing process technology
28 nm
10 nm
Texture fill rate
21.60
Floating-point performance
691.2 gflops
Memory bus width
128 Bit
Memory clock speed
4000 MHz
Memory bandwidth
64 GB/s
Shared memory
-
+
DirectX
12 (11_1)
DirectX 12_1
Shader Model
5.1
OpenGL
4.6
OpenCL
1.2
Vulkan
1.2.131
Laptop size
medium sized
Quick Sync
+
AppAcceleration
+
Check Price
Check Price
