FirePro W4190M vs Quadro 3000M
When comparing FirePro W4190M and Quadro 3000M, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between FirePro W4190M and Quadro 3000M is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
FirePro W4190M and Quadro 3000M are Laptop Graphics Cards
Note: FirePro W4190M and Quadro 3000M are only used in laptop graphics. They have lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with FirePro W4190M or Quadro 3000M here:
Main Specs
FirePro W4190M
Quadro 3000M
Power consumption (TDP)
75 Watt
Interface
PCIe 3.0 x8
MXM-B (3.0)
Supplementary power connectors
None
Memory type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount
2 GB
2 GB
Display Connectors
No outputs
No outputs
Check Price
Check Price
FirePro W4190M is connected by PCIe 3.0 x8, and Quadro 3000M uses MXM-B (3.0) interface.
FirePro W4190M and Quadro 3000M have maximum RAM of 2 GB.
Both cards are used in Laptops.
FirePro W4190M is build with GCN architecture, and Quadro 3000M - with Fermi.
Core clock speed of FirePro W4190M is 375 MHz higher, than Quadro 3000M.
FirePro W4190M is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Quadro 3000M - by 40 nm process technology.
Memory clock speed of FirePro W4190M is 3375 MHz higher, than Quadro 3000M.
Game benchmarks
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Battlefield 5
Call of Duty: Warzone
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Cyberpunk 2077
Dota 2
Far Cry 5
Fortnite
Forza Horizon 4
Grand Theft Auto V
Metro Exodus
Minecraft
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS
Red Dead Redemption 2
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
World of Tanks
high / 1080p
3−4
2−3
ultra / 1080p
1−2
1−2
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
low / 720p
14−16
12−14
medium / 1080p
5−6
4−5
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W4190M in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 20% more, than Quadro 3000M.
high / 1080p
7−8
−
ultra / 1080p
5−6
5−6
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
low / 720p
18−20
16−18
medium / 1080p
8−9
6−7
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W4190M in Battlefield 5 is 22% more, than Quadro 3000M.
low / 768p
45−50
50−55
high / 1080p
40−45
40−45
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
The average gaming FPS of Quadro 3000M in Call of Duty: Warzone is 4% more, than FirePro W4190M.
low / 768p
120−130
120−130
medium / 768p
95−100
95−100
ultra / 1080p
45−50
40−45
QHD / 1440p
24−27
21−24
4K / 2160p
−
16−18
high / 768p
70−75
65−70
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W4190M in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 2% more, than Quadro 3000M.
low / 768p
70−75
65−70
ultra / 1080p
20−22
20−22
medium / 1080p
40−45
45−50
FirePro W4190M and Quadro 3000M have the same average FPS in Cyberpunk 2077.
low / 768p
75−80
75−80
medium / 768p
55−60
45−50
ultra / 1080p
27−30
21−24
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W4190M in Dota 2 is 10% more, than Quadro 3000M.
high / 1080p
3−4
2−3
ultra / 1080p
3−4
2−3
4K / 2160p
0−1
2−3
low / 720p
14−16
10−12
medium / 1080p
5−6
4−5
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W4190M in Far Cry 5 is 20% more, than Quadro 3000M.
high / 1080p
12−14
10−11
ultra / 1080p
7−8
5−6
QHD / 1440p
4−5
4−5
low / 720p
55−60
50−55
medium / 1080p
14−16
10−12
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W4190M in Fortnite is 18% more, than Quadro 3000M.
high / 1080p
6−7
5−6
ultra / 1080p
6−7
−
QHD / 1440p
0−1
3−4
4K / 2160p
−
2−3
low / 720p
20−22
18−20
medium / 1080p
9−10
8−9
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W4190M in Forza Horizon 4 is 9% more, than Quadro 3000M.
low / 768p
45−50
45−50
high / 1080p
8−9
4−5
ultra / 1080p
3−4
2−3
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
medium / 720p
40−45
35−40
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W4190M in Grand Theft Auto V is 8% more, than Quadro 3000M.
high / 1080p
2−3
2−3
ultra / 1080p
0−1
0−1
4K / 2160p
0−1
0−1
low / 720p
7−8
4−5
medium / 1080p
3−4
3−4
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W4190M in Metro Exodus is 33% more, than Quadro 3000M.
low / 768p
85−90
85−90
high / 1080p
65−70
80−85
4K / 2160p
−
75−80
The average gaming FPS of Quadro 3000M in Minecraft is 10% more, than FirePro W4190M.
ultra / 1080p
12−14
12−14
low / 720p
27−30
27−30
medium / 1080p
14−16
14−16
FirePro W4190M and Quadro 3000M have the same average FPS in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS.
high / 1080p
6−7
−
ultra / 1080p
4−5
−
QHD / 1440p
0−1
−
low / 720p
7−8
6−7
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W4190M in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 16% more, than Quadro 3000M.
low / 768p
16−18
10−11
medium / 768p
12−14
8−9
high / 1080p
6−7
4−5
ultra / 1080p
4−5
4−5
4K / 2160p
1−2
1−2
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W4190M in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 60% more, than Quadro 3000M.
low / 768p
70−75
75−80
medium / 768p
35−40
35−40
ultra / 1080p
16−18
14−16
high / 768p
30−35
30−33
The average gaming FPS of Quadro 3000M in World of Tanks is 2% more, than FirePro W4190M.
Full Specs
FirePro W4190M
Quadro 3000M
Architecture
GCN
Fermi
Code name
Mars XTX?
Fermi
Type
Mobile workstation
Mobile workstation
Release date
12 November 2015
22 February 2011
Pipelines
384
240
Core clock speed
825 MHz
450 MHz
Boost Clock
900 MHz
Transistor count
950 million
1,950 million
Manufacturing process technology
28 nm
40 nm
Texture fill rate
21.60
18.00
Floating-point performance
691.2 gflops
432.0 gflops
Memory bus width
128 Bit
256 Bit
Memory clock speed
4000 MHz
625 MHz
Memory bandwidth
64 GB/s
80 GB/s
Shared memory
-
-
DirectX
12 (11_1)
12 (11_0)
Shader Model
5.1
5.1
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
OpenCL
1.2
1.1
Vulkan
1.2.131
N/A
CUDA
2.1
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)
28 Mh/s
Laptop size
medium sized
large
AppAcceleration
+
Check Price
Check Price
