FirePro W4190M vs Quadro K2000

In this comparison between FirePro W4190M and Quadro K2000 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people FirePro W4190M will be the best choice, for others Quadro K2000 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.

FirePro W4190M Check Price

Quadro K2000 Check Price

FirePro W4190M is a Laptop Graphics Card

Note: FirePro W4190M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with FirePro W4190M here:

FirePro W4190M Laptops

Main Specs

	FirePro W4190M	Quadro K2000
Power consumption (TDP)		51 Watt
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x8	PCIe 2.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors	None	None
Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount	2 GB	2 GB
Display Connectors	No outputs	1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort
	Check Price	Check Price

FirePro W4190M is connected by PCIe 3.0 x8, and Quadro K2000 uses PCIe 2.0 x16 interface.
FirePro W4190M and Quadro K2000 have maximum RAM of 2 GB.
FirePro W4190M is used in Mobile workstations, and Quadro K2000 - in Desktops.
FirePro W4190M is build with GCN architecture, and Quadro K2000 - with Kepler.
Core clock speed of Quadro K2000 is 129 MHz higher, than FirePro W4190M.
FirePro W4190M and Quadro K2000 are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
Memory clock speed of FirePro W4190M and Quadro K2000 is 4000 MHz.

Game benchmarks


high / 1080p	3−4	7−8
ultra / 1080p	1−2	4−5
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
low / 720p	14−16	16−18
medium / 1080p	5−6	9−10
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2000 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 50% more, than FirePro W4190M.
high / 1080p	7−8	12−14
ultra / 1080p	5−6	10−12
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
low / 720p	18−20	24−27
medium / 1080p	8−9	12−14
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2000 in Battlefield 5 is 50% more, than FirePro W4190M.
low / 768p	45−50	45−50
high / 1080p	40−45	45−50
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2000 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 4% more, than FirePro W4190M.
low / 768p	120−130	140−150
medium / 768p	95−100	110−120
ultra / 1080p	45−50	55−60
QHD / 1440p	24−27	30−35
4K / 2160p	−	27−30
high / 768p	70−75	85−90
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2000 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 19% more, than FirePro W4190M.
low / 768p	70−75	55−60
ultra / 1080p	20−22	21−24
medium / 1080p	40−45	45−50
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W4190M in Cyberpunk 2077 is 7% more, than Quadro K2000.
low / 768p	75−80	80−85
medium / 768p	55−60	60−65
ultra / 1080p	27−30	35−40
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2000 in Dota 2 is 11% more, than FirePro W4190M.
high / 1080p	3−4	9−10
ultra / 1080p	3−4	8−9
4K / 2160p	0−1	4−5
low / 720p	14−16	20−22
medium / 1080p	5−6	9−10
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2000 in Far Cry 5 is 100% more, than FirePro W4190M.
high / 1080p	12−14	14−16
ultra / 1080p	7−8	10−12
QHD / 1440p	4−5	−
low / 720p	55−60	60−65
medium / 1080p	14−16	24−27
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2000 in Fortnite is 21% more, than FirePro W4190M.
high / 1080p	6−7	12−14
ultra / 1080p	6−7	10−12
QHD / 1440p	0−1	1−2
low / 720p	20−22	27−30
medium / 1080p	9−10	14−16
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2000 in Forza Horizon 4 is 60% more, than FirePro W4190M.
low / 768p	45−50	55−60
medium / 768p	−	45−50
high / 1080p	8−9	12−14
ultra / 1080p	3−4	7−8
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
medium / 720p	40−45	−
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2000 in Grand Theft Auto V is 36% more, than FirePro W4190M.
high / 1080p	2−3	5−6
ultra / 1080p	0−1	3−4
4K / 2160p	0−1	0−1
low / 720p	7−8	12−14
medium / 1080p	3−4	7−8
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2000 in Metro Exodus is 100% more, than FirePro W4190M.
low / 768p	85−90	95−100
high / 1080p	65−70	90−95
ultra / 1080p	−	80−85
medium / 1080p	−	90−95
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2000 in Minecraft is 23% more, than FirePro W4190M.
high / 1080p	−	16−18
ultra / 1080p	12−14	14−16
low / 720p	27−30	30−35
medium / 1080p	14−16	18−20
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2000 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 22% more, than FirePro W4190M.
high / 1080p	6−7	−
ultra / 1080p	4−5	7−8
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
low / 720p	7−8	12−14
medium / 1080p	−	10−12
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2000 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 66% more, than FirePro W4190M.
low / 768p	16−18	27−30
medium / 768p	12−14	18−20
high / 1080p	6−7	10−11
ultra / 1080p	4−5	6−7
4K / 2160p	1−2	6−7
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2000 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 75% more, than FirePro W4190M.
low / 768p	70−75	85−90
medium / 768p	35−40	45−50
ultra / 1080p	16−18	20−22
high / 768p	30−35	35−40
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2000 in World of Tanks is 23% more, than FirePro W4190M.

Full Specs

	FirePro W4190M	Quadro K2000
Architecture	GCN	Kepler
Code name	Mars XTX?	GK107
Type	Mobile workstation	Workstation
Release date	12 November 2015	1 March 2013
Pipelines	384	384
Core clock speed	825 MHz	954 MHz
Boost Clock	900 MHz
Transistor count	950 million	1,270 million
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	28 nm
Texture fill rate	21.60	30.53
Floating-point performance	691.2 gflops	732.7 gflops
Length		202 mm
Memory bus width	128 Bit	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	4000 MHz	4000 MHz
Memory bandwidth	64 GB/s	64 GB/s
Shared memory	-
DirectX	12 (11_1)	12 (11_0)
Shader Model	5.1	5.1
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	1.2	1.2
Vulkan	1.2.131	1.1.126
CUDA		3.0
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)		24 Mh/s
Laptop size	medium sized
AppAcceleration	+
	Check Price	Check Price

FirePro W4190M vs Quadro K2000

FirePro W4190M is a Laptop Graphics Card

Main Specs

Game benchmarks

Full Specs

Similar compares