FirePro W4190M vs Quadro K2200M
When choosing between FirePro W4190M and Quadro K2200M, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between FirePro W4190M and Quadro K2200M.
Quadro K2200M
FirePro W4190M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: FirePro W4190M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with FirePro W4190M here:
Main Specs
| FirePro W4190M | Quadro K2200M | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 65 Watt | |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | MXM-A (3.0) |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 2 GB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- FirePro W4190M is connected by PCIe 3.0 x8, and Quadro K2200M uses MXM-A (3.0) interface.
- FirePro W4190M and Quadro K2200M have maximum RAM of 2 GB.
- FirePro W4190M is used in Mobile workstations, and Quadro K2200M - in Desktops.
- FirePro W4190M is build with GCN architecture, and Quadro K2200M - with Maxwell.
- Core clock speed of FirePro W4190M is 158 MHz higher, than Quadro K2200M.
- FirePro W4190M and Quadro K2200M are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Quadro K2200M is 1012 MHz higher, than FirePro W4190M.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 3−4 | 20−22 |
| ultra / 1080p | 1−2 | 12−14 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 6−7 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 5−6 |
| low / 720p | 14−16 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | 5−6 | 24−27 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 300% more, than FirePro W4190M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 7−8 | 30−35 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 27−30 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 10−12 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 7−8 |
| low / 720p | 18−20 | 65−70 |
| medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 35−40 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Battlefield 5 is 310% more, than FirePro W4190M. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | 40−45 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than FirePro W4190M. | ||
| low / 768p | 120−130 | 230−240 |
| medium / 768p | 95−100 | 200−210 |
| ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 110−120 |
| QHD / 1440p | 24−27 | 85−90 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 45−50 |
| high / 768p | 70−75 | 160−170 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 120% more, than FirePro W4190M. | ||
| low / 768p | 70−75 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 50−55 |
| medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 55−60 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Cyberpunk 2077 is 26% more, than FirePro W4190M. | ||
| low / 768p | 75−80 | 120−130 |
| medium / 768p | 55−60 | 100−110 |
| ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 75−80 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Dota 2 is 88% more, than FirePro W4190M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 3−4 | 24−27 |
| ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 21−24 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 18−20 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 7−8 |
| low / 720p | 14−16 | 50−55 |
| medium / 1080p | 5−6 | 24−27 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Far Cry 5 is 416% more, than FirePro W4190M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | 30−35 |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 24−27 |
| QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 55−60 | 120−130 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 70−75 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Fortnite is 184% more, than FirePro W4190M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 6−7 | 30−35 |
| ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 24−27 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 12−14 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 12−14 |
| low / 720p | 20−22 | 65−70 |
| medium / 1080p | 9−10 | 35−40 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Forza Horizon 4 is 300% more, than FirePro W4190M. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 100−110 |
| medium / 768p | − | 90−95 |
| high / 1080p | 8−9 | 40−45 |
| ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 16−18 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 6−7 |
| medium / 720p | 40−45 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Grand Theft Auto V is 184% more, than FirePro W4190M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 2−3 | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 10−11 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 2−3 |
| low / 720p | 7−8 | 40−45 |
| medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 16−18 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Metro Exodus is 500% more, than FirePro W4190M. | ||
| low / 768p | 85−90 | 120−130 |
| high / 1080p | 65−70 | − |
| medium / 1080p | − | 110−120 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Minecraft is 43% more, than FirePro W4190M. | ||
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 27−30 | 70−75 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 94% more, than FirePro W4190M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 6−7 | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 10−11 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 1−2 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 1−2 |
| low / 720p | 7−8 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 20−22 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 250% more, than FirePro W4190M. | ||
| low / 768p | 16−18 | 70−75 |
| medium / 768p | 12−14 | 45−50 |
| high / 1080p | 6−7 | 24−27 |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 14−16 |
| 4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 8−9 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 312% more, than FirePro W4190M. | ||
| low / 768p | 70−75 | 90−95 |
| medium / 768p | 35−40 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 40−45 |
| high / 768p | 30−35 | 55−60 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in World of Tanks is 61% more, than FirePro W4190M. | ||
Full Specs
| FirePro W4190M | Quadro K2200M | |
| Architecture | GCN | Maxwell |
| Code name | Mars XTX? | GM107 |
| Type | Mobile workstation | Workstation |
| Release date | 12 November 2015 | 19 July 2014 |
| Pipelines | 384 | 640 |
| Core clock speed | 825 MHz | 667 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 900 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 950 million | 1,870 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 21.60 | 26.68 |
| Floating-point performance | 691.2 gflops | 853.8 gflops |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 4000 MHz | 5012 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 64 GB/s | 80 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 (11_1) | 12 |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | 5 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.2.131 | 1.1.126 |
| CUDA | 5.0 | |
| Laptop size | medium sized | |
| Optimus | + | |
| Display Port | 1.2 | |
| 3D Vision Pro | + | |
| Mosaic | + | |
| nView Display Management | + | |
| AppAcceleration | + | |
| Check Price |