FirePro W4190M vs Radeon Pro W5500M
When choosing between FirePro W4190M and Radeon Pro W5500M, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between FirePro W4190M and Radeon Pro W5500M.
Radeon Pro W5500M
FirePro W4190M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: FirePro W4190M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with FirePro W4190M here:
Main Specs
| FirePro W4190M | Radeon Pro W5500M | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 85 Watt | |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 4.0 x8 |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR6 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 4 GB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- FirePro W4190M is connected by PCIe 3.0 x8, and Radeon Pro W5500M uses PCIe 4.0 x8 interface.
- Radeon Pro W5500M has 2 GB more memory, than FirePro W4190M.
- FirePro W4190M is used in Mobile workstations, and Radeon Pro W5500M - in Desktops.
- FirePro W4190M is build with GCN architecture, and Radeon Pro W5500M - with RDNA 1.0.
- FirePro W4190M is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Radeon Pro W5500M - by 7 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Radeon Pro W5500M is 8000 MHz higher, than FirePro W4190M.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 3−4 | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 1−2 | 8−9 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 3−4 |
| low / 720p | 14−16 | 30−33 |
| medium / 1080p | 5−6 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro W5500M in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 200% more, than FirePro W4190M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 7−8 | 21−24 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 20−22 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 6−7 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 5−6 |
| low / 720p | 18−20 | 50−55 |
| medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 24−27 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro W5500M in Battlefield 5 is 200% more, than FirePro W4190M. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| high / 1080p | 40−45 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| FirePro W4190M and Radeon Pro W5500M have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
| low / 768p | 120−130 | 200−210 |
| medium / 768p | 95−100 | 170−180 |
| ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 95−100 |
| QHD / 1440p | 24−27 | 50−55 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 30−33 |
| high / 768p | 70−75 | 130−140 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro W5500M in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 82% more, than FirePro W4190M. | ||
| low / 768p | 70−75 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro W5500M in Cyberpunk 2077 is 4% more, than FirePro W4190M. | ||
| low / 768p | 75−80 | 100−110 |
| medium / 768p | 55−60 | 90−95 |
| ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 60−65 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro W5500M in Dota 2 is 59% more, than FirePro W4190M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 3−4 | 16−18 |
| ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 14−16 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 6−7 |
| low / 720p | 14−16 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | 5−6 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro W5500M in Far Cry 5 is 266% more, than FirePro W4190M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | 24−27 |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 18−20 |
| QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 16−18 |
| low / 720p | 55−60 | 95−100 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 50−55 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro W5500M in Fortnite is 121% more, than FirePro W4190M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 6−7 | 24−27 |
| ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 18−20 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 8−9 |
| low / 720p | 20−22 | 50−55 |
| medium / 1080p | 9−10 | 27−30 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro W5500M in Forza Horizon 4 is 210% more, than FirePro W4190M. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 80−85 |
| medium / 768p | − | 70−75 |
| high / 1080p | 8−9 | 27−30 |
| ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 12−14 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 2−3 |
| medium / 720p | 40−45 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro W5500M in Grand Theft Auto V is 115% more, than FirePro W4190M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 2−3 | 9−10 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 7−8 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 2−3 |
| low / 720p | 7−8 | 27−30 |
| medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 12−14 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro W5500M in Metro Exodus is 325% more, than FirePro W4190M. | ||
| low / 768p | 85−90 | 110−120 |
| high / 1080p | 65−70 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 100−110 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 100−110 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro W5500M in Minecraft is 32% more, than FirePro W4190M. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 21−24 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 16−18 |
| low / 720p | 27−30 | 55−60 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 24−27 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro W5500M in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 83% more, than FirePro W4190M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 6−7 | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 9−10 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 7−8 | 27−30 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 16−18 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro W5500M in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 183% more, than FirePro W4190M. | ||
| low / 768p | 16−18 | 50−55 |
| medium / 768p | 12−14 | 30−35 |
| high / 1080p | 6−7 | 18−20 |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 10−11 |
| 4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 8−9 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro W5500M in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 200% more, than FirePro W4190M. | ||
| low / 768p | 70−75 | 100−110 |
| medium / 768p | 35−40 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 30−35 |
| high / 768p | 30−35 | 50−55 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro W5500M in World of Tanks is 61% more, than FirePro W4190M. | ||
Full Specs
| FirePro W4190M | Radeon Pro W5500M | |
| Architecture | GCN | RDNA 1.0 |
| Code name | Mars XTX? | Navi 14 |
| Type | Mobile workstation | Workstation |
| Release date | 12 November 2015 | 10 February 2020 |
| Pipelines | 384 | 1408 |
| Core clock speed | 825 MHz | |
| Boost Clock | 900 MHz | 1450 MHz |
| Transistor count | 950 million | 6,400 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 7 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 21.60 | 127.6 |
| Floating-point performance | 691.2 gflops | |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 4000 MHz | 12000 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 64 GB/s | 192.0 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 (11_1) | 12 (12_1) |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | 6.5 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 2.0 |
| Vulkan | 1.2.131 | 1.2.131 |
| Laptop size | medium sized | |
| AppAcceleration | + | |
| Check Price |