FirePro W4190M vs Radeon R5 430 OEM
When comparing FirePro W4190M and Radeon R5 430 OEM, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between FirePro W4190M and Radeon R5 430 OEM is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
Radeon R5 430 OEM
FirePro W4190M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: FirePro W4190M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with FirePro W4190M here:
Main Specs
| FirePro W4190M | Radeon R5 430 OEM | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 50 Watt | |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 2 GB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI, 1x DisplayPort |
| Check Price |
- Both video cards are using PCIe 3.0 x8 interface connection to a motherboard.
- FirePro W4190M and Radeon R5 430 OEM have maximum RAM of 2 GB.
- FirePro W4190M is used in Mobile workstations, and Radeon R5 430 OEM - in Desktops.
- FirePro W4190M is build with GCN architecture, and Radeon R5 430 OEM - with GCN 1.0.
- Core clock speed of FirePro W4190M is 95 MHz higher, than Radeon R5 430 OEM.
- FirePro W4190M and Radeon R5 430 OEM are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Radeon R5 430 OEM is 600 MHz higher, than FirePro W4190M.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 3−4 | 1−2 |
| ultra / 1080p | 1−2 | 0−1 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
| medium / 1080p | 5−6 | 3−4 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro W4190M in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 33% more, than Radeon R5 430 OEM. | ||
| high / 1080p | 7−8 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 4−5 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 18−20 | 14−16 |
| medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 5−6 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro W4190M in Battlefield 5 is 37% more, than Radeon R5 430 OEM. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | 40−45 | 40−45 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 50−55 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R5 430 OEM in Call of Duty: Warzone is 4% more, than FirePro W4190M. | ||
| low / 768p | 120−130 | 100−110 |
| medium / 768p | 95−100 | 80−85 |
| ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 40−45 |
| QHD / 1440p | 24−27 | 21−24 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 18−20 |
| high / 768p | 70−75 | 60−65 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro W4190M in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 15% more, than Radeon R5 430 OEM. | ||
| low / 768p | 70−75 | 70−75 |
| ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 16−18 |
| medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 50−55 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R5 430 OEM in Cyberpunk 2077 is 4% more, than FirePro W4190M. | ||
| low / 768p | 75−80 | 70−75 |
| medium / 768p | 55−60 | 45−50 |
| ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 21−24 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro W4190M in Dota 2 is 14% more, than Radeon R5 430 OEM. | ||
| high / 1080p | 3−4 | 2−3 |
| ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 2−3 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 14−16 | 10−12 |
| medium / 1080p | 5−6 | 3−4 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro W4190M in Far Cry 5 is 50% more, than Radeon R5 430 OEM. | ||
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | 10−11 |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 5−6 |
| QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 3−4 |
| low / 720p | 55−60 | 45−50 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 10−12 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro W4190M in Fortnite is 26% more, than Radeon R5 430 OEM. | ||
| high / 1080p | 6−7 | 5−6 |
| ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 5−6 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 20−22 | 16−18 |
| medium / 1080p | 9−10 | 7−8 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro W4190M in Forza Horizon 4 is 25% more, than Radeon R5 430 OEM. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 40−45 |
| medium / 768p | − | 35−40 |
| high / 1080p | 8−9 | 5−6 |
| ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 3−4 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| medium / 720p | 40−45 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro W4190M in Grand Theft Auto V is 11% more, than Radeon R5 430 OEM. | ||
| high / 1080p | 2−3 | 1−2 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 7−8 | 5−6 |
| medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 3−4 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro W4190M in Metro Exodus is 33% more, than Radeon R5 430 OEM. | ||
| low / 768p | 85−90 | 80−85 |
| high / 1080p | 65−70 | 80−85 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 65−70 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R5 430 OEM in Minecraft is 6% more, than FirePro W4190M. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 12−14 |
| low / 720p | 27−30 | 24−27 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro W4190M in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 5% more, than Radeon R5 430 OEM. | ||
| high / 1080p | 6−7 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 4−5 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 7−8 | 5−6 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro W4190M in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 20% more, than Radeon R5 430 OEM. | ||
| low / 768p | 16−18 | 12−14 |
| medium / 768p | 12−14 | 9−10 |
| high / 1080p | 6−7 | 5−6 |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 3−4 |
| 4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro W4190M in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 42% more, than Radeon R5 430 OEM. | ||
| low / 768p | 70−75 | 85−90 |
| medium / 768p | 35−40 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 12−14 |
| high / 768p | 30−35 | 27−30 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R5 430 OEM in World of Tanks is 5% more, than FirePro W4190M. | ||
Full Specs
| FirePro W4190M | Radeon R5 430 OEM | |
| Architecture | GCN | GCN 1.0 |
| Code name | Mars XTX? | Oland |
| Type | Mobile workstation | Desktop |
| Release date | 12 November 2015 | 30 June 2016 |
| Pipelines | 384 | 384 |
| Core clock speed | 825 MHz | 730 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 900 MHz | 780 MHz |
| Transistor count | 950 million | 950 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 21.60 | 18.72 |
| Floating-point performance | 691.2 gflops | 599.0 gflops |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 64 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 4000 MHz | 4600 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 64 GB/s | 36.8 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 (11_1) | 12 (11_1) |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | 5.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.2.131 | 1.2.131 |
| Laptop size | medium sized | |
| AppAcceleration | + | |
| Check Price |