FirePro W4190M vs Radeon R7 250
In this comparison between FirePro W4190M and Radeon R7 250 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people FirePro W4190M will be the best choice, for others Radeon R7 250 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
FirePro W4190M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: FirePro W4190M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with FirePro W4190M here:
Main Specs
FirePro W4190M
Radeon R7 250
Power consumption (TDP)
75 Watt
Interface
PCIe 3.0 x8
PCIe 3.0 x8
Supplementary power connectors
None
N/A
Memory type
GDDR5
DDR3, GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount
2 GB
2 GB
Display Connectors
No outputs
1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA
Check Price
Check Price
Both video cards are using PCIe 3.0 x8 interface connection to a motherboard.
FirePro W4190M and Radeon R7 250 have maximum RAM of 2 GB.
FirePro W4190M is used in Mobile workstations, and Radeon R7 250 - in Desktops.
FirePro W4190M and Radeon R7 250 are build with GCN architecture.
FirePro W4190M and Radeon R7 250 are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
Memory clock speed of FirePro W4190M is 2850 MHz higher, than Radeon R7 250.
Game benchmarks
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Battlefield 5
Call of Duty: Warzone
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Cyberpunk 2077
Dota 2
Far Cry 5
Fortnite
Forza Horizon 4
Grand Theft Auto V
Metro Exodus
Minecraft
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS
Red Dead Redemption 2
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
World of Tanks
high / 1080p
3−4
3−4
ultra / 1080p
1−2
1−2
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
low / 720p
14−16
14−16
medium / 1080p
5−6
5−6
FirePro W4190M and Radeon R7 250 have the same average FPS in Assassin's Creed Odyssey.
high / 1080p
7−8
6−7
ultra / 1080p
5−6
4−5
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
low / 720p
18−20
18−20
medium / 1080p
8−9
7−8
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W4190M in Battlefield 5 is 11% more, than Radeon R7 250.
low / 768p
45−50
50−55
high / 1080p
40−45
40−45
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 250 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 4% more, than FirePro W4190M.
low / 768p
120−130
120−130
medium / 768p
95−100
90−95
ultra / 1080p
45−50
45−50
QHD / 1440p
24−27
24−27
high / 768p
70−75
65−70
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W4190M in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 2% more, than Radeon R7 250.
low / 768p
70−75
60−65
ultra / 1080p
20−22
21−24
medium / 1080p
40−45
40−45
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W4190M in Cyberpunk 2077 is 7% more, than Radeon R7 250.
low / 768p
75−80
80−85
medium / 768p
55−60
55−60
ultra / 1080p
27−30
27−30
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 250 in Dota 2 is 3% more, than FirePro W4190M.
high / 1080p
3−4
4−5
ultra / 1080p
3−4
4−5
4K / 2160p
0−1
2−3
low / 720p
14−16
14−16
medium / 1080p
5−6
5−6
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 250 in Far Cry 5 is 16% more, than FirePro W4190M.
high / 1080p
12−14
10−12
ultra / 1080p
7−8
7−8
QHD / 1440p
4−5
1−2
low / 720p
55−60
50−55
medium / 1080p
14−16
16−18
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W4190M in Fortnite is 11% more, than Radeon R7 250.
high / 1080p
6−7
8−9
ultra / 1080p
6−7
7−8
QHD / 1440p
0−1
3−4
4K / 2160p
−
3−4
low / 720p
20−22
21−24
medium / 1080p
9−10
10−11
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 250 in Forza Horizon 4 is 20% more, than FirePro W4190M.
low / 768p
45−50
45−50
medium / 768p
−
35−40
high / 1080p
8−9
8−9
ultra / 1080p
3−4
4−5
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
medium / 720p
40−45
−
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 250 in Grand Theft Auto V is 5% more, than FirePro W4190M.
high / 1080p
2−3
2−3
ultra / 1080p
0−1
1−2
4K / 2160p
0−1
0−1
low / 720p
7−8
9−10
medium / 1080p
3−4
4−5
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 250 in Metro Exodus is 25% more, than FirePro W4190M.
low / 768p
85−90
90−95
high / 1080p
65−70
85−90
ultra / 1080p
−
80−85
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 250 in Minecraft is 16% more, than FirePro W4190M.
ultra / 1080p
12−14
12−14
low / 720p
27−30
27−30
medium / 1080p
14−16
14−16
FirePro W4190M and Radeon R7 250 have the same average FPS in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS.
high / 1080p
6−7
5−6
ultra / 1080p
4−5
3−4
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
low / 720p
7−8
7−8
medium / 1080p
−
7−8
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W4190M in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 20% more, than Radeon R7 250.
low / 768p
16−18
18−20
medium / 768p
12−14
12−14
high / 1080p
6−7
6−7
ultra / 1080p
4−5
4−5
4K / 2160p
1−2
0−1
FirePro W4190M and Radeon R7 250 have the same average FPS in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt.
low / 768p
70−75
70−75
medium / 768p
35−40
35−40
ultra / 1080p
16−18
16−18
high / 768p
30−35
30−35
FirePro W4190M and Radeon R7 250 have the same average FPS in World of Tanks.
Full Specs
FirePro W4190M
Radeon R7 250
Architecture
GCN
GCN
Code name
Mars XTX?
Oland XT
Type
Mobile workstation
Desktop
Release date
12 November 2015
1 October 2013
Pipelines
384
384
Core clock speed
825 MHz
Boost Clock
900 MHz
1050 MHz
Transistor count
950 million
950 million
Manufacturing process technology
28 nm
28 nm
Texture fill rate
21.60
25.20
Floating-point performance
691.2 gflops
716.8 gflops
Length
168 mm
Memory bus width
128 Bit
128 Bit
Memory clock speed
4000 MHz
1150 MHz
Memory bandwidth
64 GB/s
72 GB/s
Shared memory
-
-
DirectX
12 (11_1)
Shader Model
5.1
5.1
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
OpenCL
1.2
1.2
Vulkan
1.2.131
FreeSync
+
Bus support
PCIe 3.0
HDMI
+
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)
117 Mh/s
Laptop size
medium sized
Design
reference
CrossFire
+
DDMA audio
+
Ethereum / ETH (DaggerHashimoto)
3 Mh/s
AppAcceleration
+
+
Check Price
Check Price
