FirePro W4190M vs Radeon R7 384 Cores Kaveri

In this comparison between FirePro W4190M and Radeon R7 384 Cores Kaveri you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people FirePro W4190M will be the best choice, for others Radeon R7 384 Cores Kaveri will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.

FirePro W4190M Check Price

Radeon R7 384 Cores Kaveri

FirePro W4190M is a Laptop Graphics Card

Note: FirePro W4190M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with FirePro W4190M here:

FirePro W4190M Laptops

Main Specs

	FirePro W4190M	Radeon R7 384 Cores Kaveri
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x8
Supplementary power connectors	None
Memory type	GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount	2 GB
Display Connectors	No outputs
	Check Price

FirePro W4190M is used in Mobile workstations, and Radeon R7 384 Cores Kaveri - in Desktops.
FirePro W4190M and Radeon R7 384 Cores Kaveri are build with GCN architecture.
Core clock speed of FirePro W4190M is 105 MHz higher, than Radeon R7 384 Cores Kaveri.
FirePro W4190M and Radeon R7 384 Cores Kaveri are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.

Game benchmarks


high / 1080p	3−4	7−8
ultra / 1080p	1−2	4−5
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
low / 720p	14−16	18−20
medium / 1080p	5−6	9−10
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 384 Cores Kaveri in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 66% more, than FirePro W4190M.
high / 1080p	7−8	12−14
ultra / 1080p	5−6	10−12
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
low / 720p	18−20	27−30
medium / 1080p	8−9	14−16
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 384 Cores Kaveri in Battlefield 5 is 60% more, than FirePro W4190M.
low / 768p	45−50	45−50
high / 1080p	40−45	45−50
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 384 Cores Kaveri in Call of Duty: Warzone is 4% more, than FirePro W4190M.
low / 768p	120−130	140−150
medium / 768p	95−100	110−120
ultra / 1080p	45−50	55−60
QHD / 1440p	24−27	30−35
4K / 2160p	−	27−30
high / 768p	70−75	85−90
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 384 Cores Kaveri in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 19% more, than FirePro W4190M.
low / 768p	70−75	55−60
ultra / 1080p	20−22	21−24
medium / 1080p	40−45	45−50
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W4190M in Cyberpunk 2077 is 7% more, than Radeon R7 384 Cores Kaveri.
low / 768p	75−80	85−90
medium / 768p	55−60	60−65
ultra / 1080p	27−30	35−40
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 384 Cores Kaveri in Dota 2 is 14% more, than FirePro W4190M.
high / 1080p	3−4	9−10
ultra / 1080p	3−4	8−9
4K / 2160p	0−1	4−5
low / 720p	14−16	21−24
medium / 1080p	5−6	10−11
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 384 Cores Kaveri in Far Cry 5 is 100% more, than FirePro W4190M.
high / 1080p	12−14	16−18
ultra / 1080p	7−8	10−12
QHD / 1440p	4−5	−
low / 720p	55−60	65−70
medium / 1080p	14−16	24−27
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 384 Cores Kaveri in Fortnite is 30% more, than FirePro W4190M.
high / 1080p	6−7	12−14
ultra / 1080p	6−7	12−14
QHD / 1440p	0−1	2−3
low / 720p	20−22	27−30
medium / 1080p	9−10	14−16
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 384 Cores Kaveri in Forza Horizon 4 is 70% more, than FirePro W4190M.
low / 768p	45−50	55−60
medium / 768p	−	45−50
high / 1080p	8−9	14−16
ultra / 1080p	3−4	7−8
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
medium / 720p	40−45	−
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 384 Cores Kaveri in Grand Theft Auto V is 36% more, than FirePro W4190M.
high / 1080p	2−3	5−6
ultra / 1080p	0−1	3−4
4K / 2160p	0−1	0−1
low / 720p	7−8	14−16
medium / 1080p	3−4	7−8
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 384 Cores Kaveri in Metro Exodus is 125% more, than FirePro W4190M.
low / 768p	85−90	95−100
high / 1080p	65−70	90−95
ultra / 1080p	−	80−85
medium / 1080p	−	95−100
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 384 Cores Kaveri in Minecraft is 23% more, than FirePro W4190M.
high / 1080p	−	16−18
ultra / 1080p	12−14	14−16
low / 720p	27−30	35−40
medium / 1080p	14−16	18−20
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 384 Cores Kaveri in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 27% more, than FirePro W4190M.
high / 1080p	6−7	−
ultra / 1080p	4−5	8−9
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
low / 720p	7−8	14−16
medium / 1080p	−	10−12
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 384 Cores Kaveri in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 83% more, than FirePro W4190M.
low / 768p	16−18	27−30
medium / 768p	12−14	18−20
high / 1080p	6−7	10−11
ultra / 1080p	4−5	7−8
4K / 2160p	1−2	6−7
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 384 Cores Kaveri in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 75% more, than FirePro W4190M.
low / 768p	70−75	85−90
medium / 768p	35−40	45−50
ultra / 1080p	16−18	21−24
high / 768p	30−35	35−40
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 384 Cores Kaveri in World of Tanks is 23% more, than FirePro W4190M.

Full Specs

	FirePro W4190M	Radeon R7 384 Cores Kaveri
Architecture	GCN	GCN
Code name	Mars XTX?	Kaveri Spectre
Type	Mobile workstation	Desktop
Release date	12 November 2015	14 January 2014
Pipelines	384	384
Core clock speed	825 MHz	720 MHz
Boost Clock	900 MHz
Transistor count	950 million
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	28 nm
Texture fill rate	21.60
Floating-point performance	691.2 gflops
Memory bus width	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	4000 MHz
Memory bandwidth	64 GB/s
Shared memory	-	+
DirectX	12 (11_1)	DirectX 12 (FL 12_0), Shader 5.2
Shader Model	5.1
OpenGL	4.6
OpenCL	1.2
Vulkan	1.2.131
Laptop size	medium sized
AppAcceleration	+
	Check Price

FirePro W4190M vs Radeon R7 384 Cores Kaveri

FirePro W4190M is a Laptop Graphics Card

Main Specs

Game benchmarks

Full Specs

Similar compares