FirePro W4190M vs Radeon R9 370
If you are going to buy a new graphics card and are choosing between FirePro W4190M and Radeon R9 370, there are a couple of things to consider. Cards with more VRAM in general perform better and allow you to play on higher graphics settings. Size also makes a difference. A model with a large heatsink can occupy up to three expansion slots on a motherboard. Be sure you have enough room in your PC case. When comparing GPUs with different architectures, more processing cores and even higher TFLOPS will not always translate to better performance. To help you decide which GPU you need, we have measured frame rates in a number of popular games. For more on how the FirePro W4190M stacks up against Radeon R9 370, check out specs charts below.
Radeon R9 370
FirePro W4190M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: FirePro W4190M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with FirePro W4190M here:
Main Specs
| FirePro W4190M | Radeon R9 370 | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 110 Watt | |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | 1x 6-pin |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 2 GB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
| Check Price |
- FirePro W4190M is connected by PCIe 3.0 x8, and Radeon R9 370 uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
- FirePro W4190M and Radeon R9 370 have maximum RAM of 2 GB.
- FirePro W4190M is used in Mobile workstations, and Radeon R9 370 - in Desktops.
- FirePro W4190M is build with GCN architecture, and Radeon R9 370 - with GCN 1.0.
- Core clock speed of Radeon R9 370 is 100 MHz higher, than FirePro W4190M.
- FirePro W4190M and Radeon R9 370 are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Radeon R9 370 is 1600 MHz higher, than FirePro W4190M.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 3−4 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | 1−2 | 21−24 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 16−18 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 10−11 |
| low / 720p | 14−16 | 60−65 |
| medium / 1080p | 5−6 | 40−45 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 370 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 583% more, than FirePro W4190M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 7−8 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 35−40 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 18−20 |
| low / 720p | 18−20 | 100−110 |
| medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 60−65 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 370 in Battlefield 5 is 580% more, than FirePro W4190M. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | 40−45 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 370 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than FirePro W4190M. | ||
| low / 768p | 120−130 | 250−260 |
| medium / 768p | 95−100 | 220−230 |
| ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 180−190 |
| QHD / 1440p | 24−27 | 110−120 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 70−75 |
| high / 768p | 70−75 | 210−220 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 370 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 172% more, than FirePro W4190M. | ||
| low / 768p | 70−75 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | − |
| medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 55−60 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 370 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 5% more, than FirePro W4190M. | ||
| low / 768p | 75−80 | 120−130 |
| medium / 768p | 55−60 | 110−120 |
| ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 100−110 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 370 in Dota 2 is 112% more, than FirePro W4190M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 3−4 | 45−50 |
| ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 40−45 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 27−30 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 14−16 | 80−85 |
| medium / 1080p | 5−6 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 370 in Far Cry 5 is 816% more, than FirePro W4190M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 27−30 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 27−30 |
| low / 720p | 55−60 | 180−190 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 110−120 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 370 in Fortnite is 357% more, than FirePro W4190M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 6−7 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 30−35 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 24−27 |
| low / 720p | 20−22 | 100−110 |
| medium / 1080p | 9−10 | 65−70 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 370 in Forza Horizon 4 is 600% more, than FirePro W4190M. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 140−150 |
| medium / 768p | − | 120−130 |
| high / 1080p | 8−9 | 70−75 |
| ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 30−35 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 21−24 |
| medium / 720p | 40−45 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 370 in Grand Theft Auto V is 336% more, than FirePro W4190M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 2−3 | 24−27 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 20−22 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 16−18 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 8−9 |
| low / 720p | 7−8 | 65−70 |
| medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 370 in Metro Exodus is 925% more, than FirePro W4190M. | ||
| low / 768p | 85−90 | 130−140 |
| high / 1080p | 65−70 | − |
| medium / 1080p | − | 120−130 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 370 in Minecraft is 55% more, than FirePro W4190M. | ||
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 27−30 | 100−110 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 370 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 155% more, than FirePro W4190M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 6−7 | 24−27 |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 16−18 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 10−11 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 7−8 |
| low / 720p | 7−8 | 65−70 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 35−40 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 370 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 500% more, than FirePro W4190M. | ||
| low / 768p | 16−18 | 130−140 |
| medium / 768p | 12−14 | 85−90 |
| high / 1080p | 6−7 | 45−50 |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 24−27 |
| 4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 16−18 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 370 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 675% more, than FirePro W4190M. | ||
| low / 768p | 70−75 | 90−95 |
| medium / 768p | 35−40 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 50−55 |
| high / 768p | 30−35 | 60−65 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 370 in World of Tanks is 71% more, than FirePro W4190M. | ||
Full Specs
| FirePro W4190M | Radeon R9 370 | |
| Architecture | GCN | GCN 1.0 |
| Code name | Mars XTX? | Trinidad |
| Type | Mobile workstation | Desktop |
| Release date | 12 November 2015 | 5 May 2015 |
| Pipelines | 384 | 1280 |
| Core clock speed | 825 MHz | 925 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 900 MHz | 975 MHz |
| Transistor count | 950 million | 2,800 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 21.60 | 78.00 |
| Floating-point performance | 691.2 gflops | 2,496 gflops |
| Length | 221 mm | |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 256 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 4000 MHz | 5600 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 64 GB/s | 179.2 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 (11_1) | 12 (11_1) |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | 5.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.2.131 | 1.2.131 |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 336 Mh/s | |
| Laptop size | medium sized | |
| AppAcceleration | + | |
| Check Price |