FirePro W4190M vs Radeon R9 A375
In this comparison between FirePro W4190M and Radeon R9 A375 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people FirePro W4190M will be the best choice, for others Radeon R9 A375 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
Radeon R9 A375
FirePro W4190M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: FirePro W4190M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with FirePro W4190M here:
Main Specs
FirePro W4190M | Radeon R9 A375 | |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 2 GB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Check Price |
- FirePro W4190M is connected by PCIe 3.0 x8, and Radeon R9 A375 uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
- FirePro W4190M and Radeon R9 A375 have maximum RAM of 2 GB.
- FirePro W4190M is used in Mobile workstations, and Radeon R9 A375 - in Desktops.
- FirePro W4190M is build with GCN architecture, and Radeon R9 A375 - with GCN 1.0.
- Core clock speed of Radeon R9 A375 is 75 MHz higher, than FirePro W4190M.
- FirePro W4190M and Radeon R9 A375 are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of FirePro W4190M is 3996 MHz higher, than Radeon R9 A375.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 3−4 | 2−3 |
ultra / 1080p | 1−2 | 1−2 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
medium / 1080p | 5−6 | 4−5 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W4190M in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 20% more, than Radeon R9 A375. | ||
high / 1080p | 7−8 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 5−6 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 18−20 | 16−18 |
medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 6−7 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W4190M in Battlefield 5 is 22% more, than Radeon R9 A375. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | 40−45 | 40−45 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 A375 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 4% more, than FirePro W4190M. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 120−130 |
medium / 768p | 95−100 | 95−100 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 40−45 |
QHD / 1440p | 24−27 | 21−24 |
4K / 2160p | − | 16−18 |
high / 768p | 70−75 | 65−70 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W4190M in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 2% more, than Radeon R9 A375. | ||
low / 768p | 70−75 | 65−70 |
ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 20−22 |
medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 45−50 |
FirePro W4190M and Radeon R9 A375 have the same average FPS in Cyberpunk 2077. | ||
low / 768p | 75−80 | 75−80 |
medium / 768p | 55−60 | 45−50 |
ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W4190M in Dota 2 is 10% more, than Radeon R9 A375. | ||
high / 1080p | 3−4 | 2−3 |
ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 2−3 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 2−3 |
low / 720p | 14−16 | 10−12 |
medium / 1080p | 5−6 | 4−5 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W4190M in Far Cry 5 is 20% more, than Radeon R9 A375. | ||
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 10−11 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 5−6 |
QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 4−5 |
low / 720p | 55−60 | 50−55 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 10−12 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W4190M in Fortnite is 18% more, than Radeon R9 A375. | ||
high / 1080p | 6−7 | 5−6 |
ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 3−4 |
4K / 2160p | − | 2−3 |
low / 720p | 20−22 | 18−20 |
medium / 1080p | 9−10 | 8−9 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W4190M in Forza Horizon 4 is 9% more, than Radeon R9 A375. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
high / 1080p | 8−9 | 4−5 |
ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 2−3 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
medium / 720p | 40−45 | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W4190M in Grand Theft Auto V is 8% more, than Radeon R9 A375. | ||
high / 1080p | 2−3 | 2−3 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 7−8 | 4−5 |
medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 3−4 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W4190M in Metro Exodus is 33% more, than Radeon R9 A375. | ||
low / 768p | 85−90 | 85−90 |
high / 1080p | 65−70 | 80−85 |
4K / 2160p | − | 75−80 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 A375 in Minecraft is 10% more, than FirePro W4190M. | ||
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 12−14 |
low / 720p | 27−30 | 27−30 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
FirePro W4190M and Radeon R9 A375 have the same average FPS in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS. | ||
high / 1080p | 6−7 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | − |
low / 720p | 7−8 | 6−7 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W4190M in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 16% more, than Radeon R9 A375. | ||
low / 768p | 16−18 | 10−11 |
medium / 768p | 12−14 | 8−9 |
high / 1080p | 6−7 | 4−5 |
ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 4−5 |
4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 1−2 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W4190M in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 60% more, than Radeon R9 A375. | ||
low / 768p | 70−75 | 75−80 |
medium / 768p | 35−40 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 14−16 |
high / 768p | 30−35 | 30−33 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 A375 in World of Tanks is 2% more, than FirePro W4190M. |
Full Specs
FirePro W4190M | Radeon R9 A375 | |
Architecture | GCN | GCN 1.0 |
Code name | Mars XTX? | Venus |
Type | Mobile workstation | Desktop |
Release date | 12 November 2015 | no data |
Pipelines | 384 | 640 |
Core clock speed | 825 MHz | 900 MHz |
Boost Clock | 900 MHz | 925 MHz |
Transistor count | 950 million | 1,500 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Texture fill rate | 21.60 | 37.00 |
Floating-point performance | 691.2 gflops | |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 4000 MHz | 4.5 GB/s |
Memory bandwidth | 64 GB/s | 72 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 (11_1) | 12 (11_1) |
Shader Model | 5.1 | 5.1 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.2 |
Vulkan | 1.2.131 | 1.2 |
Laptop size | medium sized | |
AppAcceleration | + | |
Check Price |
Similar compares
- FirePro W4190M vs HD Graphics 630
- FirePro W4190M vs UHD Graphics 630
- Radeon R9 A375 vs HD Graphics 630
- Radeon R9 A375 vs UHD Graphics 630
- FirePro W4190M vs Radeon HD 8550G plus HD 8750M Dual Graphics
- FirePro W4190M vs Quadro 3000M
- Radeon R9 A375 vs Radeon HD 8550G plus HD 8750M Dual Graphics
- Radeon R9 A375 vs Quadro 3000M