FirePro W4190M vs Radeon RX 560X
When comparing FirePro W4190M and Radeon RX 560X, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between FirePro W4190M and Radeon RX 560X is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
Radeon RX 560X
FirePro W4190M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: FirePro W4190M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with FirePro W4190M here:
Main Specs
FirePro W4190M | Radeon RX 560X | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 75 Watt | |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 4 GB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
Check Price |
- Both video cards are using PCIe 3.0 x8 interface connection to a motherboard.
- Radeon RX 560X has 2 GB more memory, than FirePro W4190M.
- FirePro W4190M is used in Mobile workstations, and Radeon RX 560X - in Desktops.
- FirePro W4190M is build with GCN architecture, and Radeon RX 560X - with GCN 4.0.
- Core clock speed of Radeon RX 560X is 350 MHz higher, than FirePro W4190M.
- FirePro W4190M is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Radeon RX 560X - by 14 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Radeon RX 560X is 3000 MHz higher, than FirePro W4190M.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 3−4 | 18−20 |
ultra / 1080p | 1−2 | 10−11 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 4−5 |
4K / 2160p | − | 4−5 |
low / 720p | 14−16 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 5−6 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX 560X in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 266% more, than FirePro W4190M. | ||
high / 1080p | 7−8 | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 24−27 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 8−9 |
4K / 2160p | − | 6−7 |
low / 720p | 18−20 | 60−65 |
medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX 560X in Battlefield 5 is 270% more, than FirePro W4190M. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | 40−45 | 50−55 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX 560X in Call of Duty: Warzone is 15% more, than FirePro W4190M. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 220−230 |
medium / 768p | 95−100 | 190−200 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 110−120 |
QHD / 1440p | 24−27 | 70−75 |
4K / 2160p | − | 35−40 |
high / 768p | 70−75 | 150−160 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX 560X in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 108% more, than FirePro W4190M. | ||
low / 768p | 70−75 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 45−50 |
medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX 560X in Cyberpunk 2077 is 22% more, than FirePro W4190M. | ||
low / 768p | 75−80 | 110−120 |
medium / 768p | 55−60 | 100−110 |
ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 70−75 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX 560X in Dota 2 is 79% more, than FirePro W4190M. | ||
high / 1080p | 3−4 | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 20−22 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 18−20 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 7−8 |
low / 720p | 14−16 | 45−50 |
medium / 1080p | 5−6 | 24−27 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX 560X in Far Cry 5 is 383% more, than FirePro W4190M. | ||
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 55−60 | 110−120 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 60−65 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX 560X in Fortnite is 152% more, than FirePro W4190M. | ||
high / 1080p | 6−7 | 30−35 |
ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 10−12 |
low / 720p | 20−22 | 60−65 |
medium / 1080p | 9−10 | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX 560X in Forza Horizon 4 is 280% more, than FirePro W4190M. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 95−100 |
medium / 768p | − | 85−90 |
high / 1080p | 8−9 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 14−16 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 5−6 |
medium / 720p | 40−45 | − |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX 560X in Grand Theft Auto V is 163% more, than FirePro W4190M. | ||
high / 1080p | 2−3 | 10−12 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 9−10 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 2−3 |
low / 720p | 7−8 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX 560X in Metro Exodus is 425% more, than FirePro W4190M. | ||
low / 768p | 85−90 | 110−120 |
high / 1080p | 65−70 | − |
medium / 1080p | − | 110−120 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX 560X in Minecraft is 32% more, than FirePro W4190M. | ||
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 27−30 | 65−70 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX 560X in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 83% more, than FirePro W4190M. | ||
high / 1080p | 6−7 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 9−10 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 7−8 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | − | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX 560X in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 233% more, than FirePro W4190M. | ||
low / 768p | 16−18 | 65−70 |
medium / 768p | 12−14 | 40−45 |
high / 1080p | 6−7 | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 12−14 |
4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 7−8 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX 560X in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 275% more, than FirePro W4190M. | ||
low / 768p | 70−75 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 35−40 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 35−40 |
high / 768p | 30−35 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX 560X in World of Tanks is 58% more, than FirePro W4190M. |
Full Specs
FirePro W4190M | Radeon RX 560X | |
Architecture | GCN | GCN 4.0 |
Code name | Mars XTX? | Polaris 21 |
Type | Mobile workstation | Desktop |
Release date | 12 November 2015 | 11 April 2018 |
Pipelines | 384 | 1024 |
Core clock speed | 825 MHz | 1175 MHz |
Boost Clock | 900 MHz | 1275 MHz |
Transistor count | 950 million | 3,000 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 14 nm |
Texture fill rate | 21.60 | 81.60 |
Floating-point performance | 691.2 gflops | 2,611 gflops |
Length | 170 mm | |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 4000 MHz | 7000 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 64 GB/s | 112.0 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 (11_1) | 12 (12_0) |
Shader Model | 5.1 | 6.4 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | 2.0 |
Vulkan | 1.2.131 | 1.2.131 |
Laptop size | medium sized | |
AppAcceleration | + | |
Check Price |