FirePro W4190M vs Radeon RX Vega 11
If you are going to buy a new graphics card and are choosing between FirePro W4190M and Radeon RX Vega 11, there are a couple of things to consider. Cards with more VRAM in general perform better and allow you to play on higher graphics settings. Size also makes a difference. A model with a large heatsink can occupy up to three expansion slots on a motherboard. Be sure you have enough room in your PC case. When comparing GPUs with different architectures, more processing cores and even higher TFLOPS will not always translate to better performance. To help you decide which GPU you need, we have measured frame rates in a number of popular games. For more on how the FirePro W4190M stacks up against Radeon RX Vega 11, check out specs charts below.
Radeon RX Vega 11
FirePro W4190M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: FirePro W4190M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with FirePro W4190M here:
Main Specs
| FirePro W4190M | Radeon RX Vega 11 | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 15 Watt | |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | IGP |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | System Shared |
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- FirePro W4190M is connected by PCIe 3.0 x8, and Radeon RX Vega 11 uses IGP interface.
- FirePro W4190M is used in Mobile workstations, and Radeon RX Vega 11 - in Desktops.
- FirePro W4190M is build with GCN architecture, and Radeon RX Vega 11 - with Vega.
- FirePro W4190M is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Radeon RX Vega 11 - by 14 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 3−4 | 10−11 |
| ultra / 1080p | 1−2 | 6−7 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 1−2 |
| low / 720p | 14−16 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 5−6 | 12−14 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX Vega 11 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 116% more, than FirePro W4190M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 7−8 | 16−18 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 14−16 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 18−20 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX Vega 11 in Battlefield 5 is 120% more, than FirePro W4190M. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| high / 1080p | 40−45 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| FirePro W4190M and Radeon RX Vega 11 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
| low / 768p | 120−130 | 170−180 |
| medium / 768p | 95−100 | 140−150 |
| ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 70−75 |
| QHD / 1440p | 24−27 | 40−45 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 30−33 |
| high / 768p | 70−75 | 110−120 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX Vega 11 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 50% more, than FirePro W4190M. | ||
| low / 768p | 70−75 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 27−30 |
| medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro W4190M in Cyberpunk 2077 is 2% more, than Radeon RX Vega 11. | ||
| low / 768p | 75−80 | 95−100 |
| medium / 768p | 55−60 | 75−80 |
| ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX Vega 11 in Dota 2 is 37% more, than FirePro W4190M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 3−4 | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 10−12 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 4−5 |
| low / 720p | 14−16 | 27−30 |
| medium / 1080p | 5−6 | 12−14 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX Vega 11 in Far Cry 5 is 166% more, than FirePro W4190M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | 18−20 |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 14−16 |
| QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | − |
| low / 720p | 55−60 | 75−80 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 35−40 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX Vega 11 in Fortnite is 60% more, than FirePro W4190M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 6−7 | 18−20 |
| ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 14−16 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 4−5 |
| low / 720p | 20−22 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | 9−10 | 20−22 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX Vega 11 in Forza Horizon 4 is 130% more, than FirePro W4190M. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 65−70 |
| medium / 768p | − | 60−65 |
| high / 1080p | 8−9 | 20−22 |
| ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 9−10 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| medium / 720p | 40−45 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX Vega 11 in Grand Theft Auto V is 68% more, than FirePro W4190M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 2−3 | 7−8 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 5−6 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 1−2 |
| low / 720p | 7−8 | 20−22 |
| medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 9−10 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX Vega 11 in Metro Exodus is 200% more, than FirePro W4190M. | ||
| low / 768p | 85−90 | 100−110 |
| high / 1080p | 65−70 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 90−95 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 95−100 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX Vega 11 in Minecraft is 20% more, than FirePro W4190M. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 18−20 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 27−30 | 40−45 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 20−22 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX Vega 11 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 44% more, than FirePro W4190M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 6−7 | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 8−9 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 7−8 | 18−20 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX Vega 11 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 116% more, than FirePro W4190M. | ||
| low / 768p | 16−18 | 35−40 |
| medium / 768p | 12−14 | 24−27 |
| high / 1080p | 6−7 | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 8−9 |
| 4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 7−8 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX Vega 11 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 125% more, than FirePro W4190M. | ||
| low / 768p | 70−75 | 90−95 |
| medium / 768p | 35−40 | 50−55 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 27−30 |
| high / 768p | 30−35 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX Vega 11 in World of Tanks is 41% more, than FirePro W4190M. | ||
Full Specs
| FirePro W4190M | Radeon RX Vega 11 | |
| Architecture | GCN | Vega |
| Code name | Mars XTX? | Vega Raven Ridge |
| Type | Mobile workstation | Desktop |
| Release date | 12 November 2015 | 26 October 2017 |
| Pipelines | 384 | 704 |
| Core clock speed | 825 MHz | |
| Boost Clock | 900 MHz | 1240 MHz |
| Transistor count | 950 million | 4,940 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 14 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 21.60 | 61.60 |
| Floating-point performance | 691.2 gflops | 1,760 gflops |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | |
| Memory clock speed | 4000 MHz | |
| Memory bandwidth | 64 GB/s | |
| Shared memory | - | - |
| DirectX | 12 (11_1) | 12 (12_1) |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | 6.4 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 2.0 |
| Vulkan | 1.2.131 | 1.2.131 |
| Laptop size | medium sized | |
| AppAcceleration | + | |
| Check Price |