FirePro W4190M vs Radeon RX Vega M GL
When comparing FirePro W4190M and Radeon RX Vega M GL, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between FirePro W4190M and Radeon RX Vega M GL is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
FirePro W4190M and Radeon RX Vega M GL are Laptop Graphics Cards
Note: FirePro W4190M and Radeon RX Vega M GL are only used in laptop graphics. They have lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with FirePro W4190M or Radeon RX Vega M GL here:
Main Specs
FirePro W4190M
Radeon RX Vega M GL
Power consumption (TDP)
65 Watt
Interface
PCIe 3.0 x8
IGP
Supplementary power connectors
None
Memory type
GDDR5
HBM2
Maximum RAM amount
2 GB
4 GB
Display Connectors
No outputs
No outputs
Check Price
Check Price
FirePro W4190M is connected by PCIe 3.0 x8, and Radeon RX Vega M GL uses IGP interface.
Radeon RX Vega M GL has 2 GB more memory, than FirePro W4190M.
FirePro W4190M is used in Mobile workstations, and Radeon RX Vega M GL - in Laptops.
FirePro W4190M is build with GCN architecture, and Radeon RX Vega M GL - with GCN 4.0.
Core clock speed of Radeon RX Vega M GL is 106 MHz higher, than FirePro W4190M.
FirePro W4190M is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Radeon RX Vega M GL - by 14 nm process technology.
Memory clock speed of FirePro W4190M is 2600 MHz higher, than Radeon RX Vega M GL.
Game benchmarks
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Battlefield 5
Call of Duty: Warzone
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Cyberpunk 2077
Dota 2
Far Cry 5
Fortnite
Forza Horizon 4
Grand Theft Auto V
Metro Exodus
Minecraft
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS
Red Dead Redemption 2
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
World of Tanks
high / 1080p
3−4
16−18
ultra / 1080p
1−2
10−11
QHD / 1440p
0−1
4−5
low / 720p
14−16
35−40
medium / 1080p
5−6
21−24
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX Vega M GL in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 250% more, than FirePro W4190M.
high / 1080p
7−8
27−30
ultra / 1080p
5−6
24−27
QHD / 1440p
0−1
7−8
4K / 2160p
−
6−7
low / 720p
18−20
60−65
medium / 1080p
8−9
30−35
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX Vega M GL in Battlefield 5 is 270% more, than FirePro W4190M.
low / 768p
45−50
50−55
high / 1080p
40−45
50−55
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX Vega M GL in Call of Duty: Warzone is 15% more, than FirePro W4190M.
low / 768p
120−130
220−230
medium / 768p
95−100
190−200
ultra / 1080p
45−50
100−110
QHD / 1440p
24−27
65−70
4K / 2160p
−
35−40
high / 768p
70−75
150−160
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX Vega M GL in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 104% more, than FirePro W4190M.
low / 768p
70−75
60−65
ultra / 1080p
20−22
45−50
medium / 1080p
40−45
55−60
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX Vega M GL in Cyberpunk 2077 is 22% more, than FirePro W4190M.
low / 768p
75−80
110−120
medium / 768p
55−60
100−110
ultra / 1080p
27−30
70−75
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX Vega M GL in Dota 2 is 79% more, than FirePro W4190M.
high / 1080p
3−4
21−24
ultra / 1080p
3−4
18−20
QHD / 1440p
−
18−20
4K / 2160p
0−1
6−7
low / 720p
14−16
45−50
medium / 1080p
5−6
21−24
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX Vega M GL in Far Cry 5 is 350% more, than FirePro W4190M.
high / 1080p
12−14
27−30
ultra / 1080p
7−8
21−24
QHD / 1440p
4−5
14−16
low / 720p
55−60
110−120
medium / 1080p
14−16
60−65
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX Vega M GL in Fortnite is 152% more, than FirePro W4190M.
high / 1080p
6−7
30−33
ultra / 1080p
6−7
21−24
QHD / 1440p
0−1
10−12
low / 720p
20−22
60−65
medium / 1080p
9−10
30−35
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX Vega M GL in Forza Horizon 4 is 270% more, than FirePro W4190M.
low / 768p
45−50
95−100
medium / 768p
−
85−90
high / 1080p
8−9
35−40
ultra / 1080p
3−4
14−16
QHD / 1440p
0−1
4−5
medium / 720p
40−45
−
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX Vega M GL in Grand Theft Auto V is 163% more, than FirePro W4190M.
high / 1080p
2−3
10−12
ultra / 1080p
0−1
8−9
4K / 2160p
0−1
2−3
low / 720p
7−8
35−40
medium / 1080p
3−4
14−16
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX Vega M GL in Metro Exodus is 425% more, than FirePro W4190M.
low / 768p
85−90
110−120
high / 1080p
65−70
−
medium / 1080p
−
110−120
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX Vega M GL in Minecraft is 32% more, than FirePro W4190M.
ultra / 1080p
12−14
14−16
low / 720p
27−30
65−70
medium / 1080p
14−16
18−20
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX Vega M GL in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 83% more, than FirePro W4190M.
high / 1080p
6−7
14−16
ultra / 1080p
4−5
9−10
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
low / 720p
7−8
30−35
medium / 1080p
−
18−20
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX Vega M GL in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 216% more, than FirePro W4190M.
low / 768p
16−18
60−65
medium / 768p
12−14
40−45
high / 1080p
6−7
21−24
ultra / 1080p
4−5
12−14
4K / 2160p
1−2
7−8
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX Vega M GL in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 262% more, than FirePro W4190M.
low / 768p
70−75
90−95
medium / 768p
35−40
60−65
ultra / 1080p
16−18
35−40
high / 768p
30−35
55−60
The average gaming FPS of Radeon RX Vega M GL in World of Tanks is 58% more, than FirePro W4190M.
Full Specs
FirePro W4190M
Radeon RX Vega M GL
Architecture
GCN
GCN 4.0
Code name
Mars XTX?
Polaris 22
Type
Mobile workstation
Laptop
Release date
12 November 2015
1 February 2018
Pipelines
384
1280
Core clock speed
825 MHz
931 MHz
Boost Clock
900 MHz
1011 MHz
Transistor count
950 million
5,000 million
Manufacturing process technology
28 nm
14 nm
Texture fill rate
21.60
80.88
Floating-point performance
691.2 gflops
2,588 gflops
Memory bus width
128 Bit
1024 Bit
Memory clock speed
4000 MHz
1400 MHz
Memory bandwidth
64 GB/s
179.2 GB/s
Shared memory
-
-
DirectX
12 (11_1)
12 (12_0)
Shader Model
5.1
6.4
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
OpenCL
1.2
2.0
Vulkan
1.2.131
1.2.131
Laptop size
medium sized
AppAcceleration
+
Check Price
Check Price