FirePro W4190M vs Tesla C2050
Find out if it is worth upgrading your current GPU setup by comparing FirePro W4190M and Tesla C2050. Here you can take a closer look at graphics cards specs, such as core clock speed, memory type and size, display connectors, etc. The price, overall benchmark and gaming performances are usually defining factors when it comes to choosing between FirePro W4190M and Tesla C2050. Make sure that the graphics card has compatible dimensions and will properly fit in your new or current computer case. Also these graphics cards may have different system power recommendations, so take that into consideration and upgrade your PSU if necessary.
Tesla C2050
FirePro W4190M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: FirePro W4190M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with FirePro W4190M here:
Main Specs
| FirePro W4190M | Tesla C2050 | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 238 Watt | |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 3 GB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI |
| Check Price |
- FirePro W4190M is connected by PCIe 3.0 x8, and Tesla C2050 uses PCIe 2.0 x16 interface.
- Tesla C2050 has 1 GB more memory, than FirePro W4190M.
- FirePro W4190M is used in Mobile workstations, and Tesla C2050 - in Desktops.
- FirePro W4190M is build with GCN architecture, and Tesla C2050 - with Fermi.
- Core clock speed of FirePro W4190M is 251 MHz higher, than Tesla C2050.
- FirePro W4190M is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Tesla C2050 - by 40 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of FirePro W4190M is 1000 MHz higher, than Tesla C2050.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 3−4 | 18−20 |
| ultra / 1080p | 1−2 | 10−11 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 4−5 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 4−5 |
| low / 720p | 14−16 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | 5−6 | 21−24 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 266% more, than FirePro W4190M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 7−8 | 27−30 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 24−27 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 8−9 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 6−7 |
| low / 720p | 18−20 | 60−65 |
| medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Battlefield 5 is 270% more, than FirePro W4190M. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | 40−45 | 50−55 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 15% more, than FirePro W4190M. | ||
| low / 768p | 120−130 | 220−230 |
| medium / 768p | 95−100 | 190−200 |
| ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 110−120 |
| QHD / 1440p | 24−27 | 70−75 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 35−40 |
| high / 768p | 70−75 | 150−160 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 108% more, than FirePro W4190M. | ||
| low / 768p | 70−75 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 45−50 |
| medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 55−60 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 22% more, than FirePro W4190M. | ||
| low / 768p | 75−80 | 110−120 |
| medium / 768p | 55−60 | 100−110 |
| ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 70−75 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Dota 2 is 79% more, than FirePro W4190M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 3−4 | 21−24 |
| ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 20−22 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 18−20 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 7−8 |
| low / 720p | 14−16 | 45−50 |
| medium / 1080p | 5−6 | 24−27 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Far Cry 5 is 383% more, than FirePro W4190M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | 27−30 |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 21−24 |
| QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 55−60 | 110−120 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 60−65 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Fortnite is 152% more, than FirePro W4190M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 6−7 | 30−35 |
| ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 21−24 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 10−12 |
| low / 720p | 20−22 | 60−65 |
| medium / 1080p | 9−10 | 35−40 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Forza Horizon 4 is 280% more, than FirePro W4190M. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 95−100 |
| medium / 768p | − | 85−90 |
| high / 1080p | 8−9 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 14−16 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 5−6 |
| medium / 720p | 40−45 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Grand Theft Auto V is 163% more, than FirePro W4190M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 2−3 | 10−12 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 9−10 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 2−3 |
| low / 720p | 7−8 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Metro Exodus is 425% more, than FirePro W4190M. | ||
| low / 768p | 85−90 | 110−120 |
| high / 1080p | 65−70 | − |
| medium / 1080p | − | 110−120 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Minecraft is 32% more, than FirePro W4190M. | ||
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 27−30 | 65−70 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 83% more, than FirePro W4190M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 6−7 | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 9−10 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 7−8 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 233% more, than FirePro W4190M. | ||
| low / 768p | 16−18 | 65−70 |
| medium / 768p | 12−14 | 40−45 |
| high / 1080p | 6−7 | 21−24 |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 12−14 |
| 4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 7−8 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 275% more, than FirePro W4190M. | ||
| low / 768p | 70−75 | 90−95 |
| medium / 768p | 35−40 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 35−40 |
| high / 768p | 30−35 | 55−60 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in World of Tanks is 58% more, than FirePro W4190M. | ||
Full Specs
| FirePro W4190M | Tesla C2050 | |
| Architecture | GCN | Fermi |
| Code name | Mars XTX? | GF100 |
| Type | Mobile workstation | Workstation |
| Release date | 12 November 2015 | 25 July 2011 |
| Pipelines | 384 | 448 |
| Core clock speed | 825 MHz | 574 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 900 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 950 million | 3,100 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 40 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 21.60 | 32.14 |
| Floating-point performance | 691.2 gflops | 1,030.4 gflops |
| Length | 248 mm | |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 384 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 4000 MHz | 3000 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 64 GB/s | 144.0 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 (11_1) | 12 (11_0) |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | 5.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.1 |
| Vulkan | 1.2.131 | N/A |
| CUDA | 2.0 | |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 90 Mh/s | |
| Laptop size | medium sized | |
| AppAcceleration | + | |
| Check Price |