FirePro W4190M vs Tesla M6
In this comparison between FirePro W4190M and Tesla M6 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people FirePro W4190M will be the best choice, for others Tesla M6 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
Tesla M6
![](/static/img/graphics-card.jpg)
FirePro W4190M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: FirePro W4190M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with FirePro W4190M here:
Main Specs
FirePro W4190M | Tesla M6 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 100 Watt | |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 8 GB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Check Price |
- FirePro W4190M is connected by PCIe 3.0 x8, and Tesla M6 uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
- Tesla M6 has 6 GB more memory, than FirePro W4190M.
- FirePro W4190M is used in Mobile workstations, and Tesla M6 - in Desktops.
- FirePro W4190M is build with GCN architecture, and Tesla M6 - with Maxwell 2.0.
- Core clock speed of Tesla M6 is 105 MHz higher, than FirePro W4190M.
- FirePro W4190M and Tesla M6 are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Tesla M6 is 1012 MHz higher, than FirePro W4190M.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 3−4 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 1−2 | 24−27 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 20−22 |
4K / 2160p | − | 10−12 |
low / 720p | 14−16 | 65−70 |
medium / 1080p | 5−6 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M6 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 633% more, than FirePro W4190M. | ||
high / 1080p | 7−8 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 50−55 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 35−40 |
4K / 2160p | − | 20−22 |
low / 720p | 18−20 | 110−120 |
medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 70−75 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M6 in Battlefield 5 is 650% more, than FirePro W4190M. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | 40−45 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M6 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than FirePro W4190M. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 250−260 |
medium / 768p | 95−100 | 220−230 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 190−200 |
QHD / 1440p | 24−27 | 120−130 |
4K / 2160p | − | 75−80 |
high / 768p | 70−75 | 210−220 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M6 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 178% more, than FirePro W4190M. | ||
low / 768p | 70−75 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | − |
medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M6 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 5% more, than FirePro W4190M. | ||
low / 768p | 75−80 | 120−130 |
medium / 768p | 55−60 | 110−120 |
ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 100−110 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M6 in Dota 2 is 112% more, than FirePro W4190M. | ||
high / 1080p | 3−4 | 50−55 |
ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 30−35 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 16−18 |
low / 720p | 14−16 | 85−90 |
medium / 1080p | 5−6 | 50−55 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M6 in Far Cry 5 is 900% more, than FirePro W4190M. | ||
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 65−70 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 50−55 |
QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 30−35 |
4K / 2160p | − | 27−30 |
low / 720p | 55−60 | 190−200 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 120−130 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M6 in Fortnite is 394% more, than FirePro W4190M. | ||
high / 1080p | 6−7 | 65−70 |
ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 50−55 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 35−40 |
4K / 2160p | − | 24−27 |
low / 720p | 20−22 | 110−120 |
medium / 1080p | 9−10 | 70−75 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M6 in Forza Horizon 4 is 660% more, than FirePro W4190M. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 140−150 |
medium / 768p | − | 130−140 |
high / 1080p | 8−9 | 75−80 |
ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 35−40 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 24−27 |
medium / 720p | 40−45 | − |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M6 in Grand Theft Auto V is 352% more, than FirePro W4190M. | ||
high / 1080p | 2−3 | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 18−20 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 10−11 |
low / 720p | 7−8 | 75−80 |
medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M6 in Metro Exodus is 1075% more, than FirePro W4190M. | ||
low / 768p | 85−90 | 130−140 |
high / 1080p | 65−70 | − |
medium / 1080p | − | 120−130 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M6 in Minecraft is 55% more, than FirePro W4190M. | ||
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 27−30 | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M6 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 155% more, than FirePro W4190M. | ||
high / 1080p | 6−7 | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 18−20 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 12−14 |
4K / 2160p | − | 8−9 |
low / 720p | 7−8 | 70−75 |
medium / 1080p | − | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M6 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 566% more, than FirePro W4190M. | ||
low / 768p | 16−18 | 140−150 |
medium / 768p | 12−14 | 90−95 |
high / 1080p | 6−7 | 50−55 |
ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 27−30 |
4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M6 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 737% more, than FirePro W4190M. | ||
low / 768p | 70−75 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 35−40 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 55−60 |
high / 768p | 30−35 | − |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M6 in World of Tanks is 66% more, than FirePro W4190M. |
Full Specs
FirePro W4190M | Tesla M6 | |
Architecture | GCN | Maxwell 2.0 |
Code name | Mars XTX? | GM204 |
Type | Mobile workstation | Workstation |
Release date | 12 November 2015 | 30 August 2015 |
Pipelines | 384 | 1536 |
Core clock speed | 825 MHz | 930 MHz |
Boost Clock | 900 MHz | 1180 MHz |
Transistor count | 950 million | 5,200 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Texture fill rate | 21.60 | 113.3 |
Floating-point performance | 691.2 gflops | 3,625 gflops |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 4000 MHz | 5012 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 64 GB/s | 160.4 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 (11_1) | 12 (12_1) |
Shader Model | 5.1 | 6.4 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.2 |
Vulkan | 1.2.131 | 1.1.126 |
CUDA | 5.2 | |
Laptop size | medium sized | |
AppAcceleration | + | |
Check Price |