FirePro M4100 vs FirePro W4300

In this comparison between FirePro M4100 and FirePro W4300 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people FirePro M4100 will be the best choice, for others FirePro W4300 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.

FirePro M4100 Check Price

FirePro W4300 Check Price

FirePro M4100 is a Laptop Graphics Card

Note: FirePro M4100 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with FirePro M4100 here:

FirePro M4100 Laptops

Main Specs

	FirePro M4100	FirePro W4300
Power consumption (TDP)		50 Watt
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x8	PCIe 3.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors		None
Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount	2 GB	4 GB
Display Connectors	No outputs	4x mini-DisplayPort
	Check Price	Check Price

FirePro M4100 is connected by PCIe 3.0 x8, and FirePro W4300 uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
FirePro W4300 has 2 GB more memory, than FirePro M4100.
FirePro M4100 is used in Mobile workstations, and FirePro W4300 - in Desktops.
FirePro M4100 is build with GCN architecture, and FirePro W4300 - with GCN 2.0.
Core clock speed of FirePro W4300 is 260 MHz higher, than FirePro M4100.
FirePro M4100 and FirePro W4300 are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
Memory clock speed of FirePro W4300 is 2000 MHz higher, than FirePro M4100.

Game benchmarks


high / 1080p	1−2	14−16
ultra / 1080p	0−1	8−9
QHD / 1440p	0−1	3−4
low / 720p	12−14	30−35
medium / 1080p	3−4	18−20
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W4300 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 266% more, than FirePro M4100.
high / 1080p	−	24−27
ultra / 1080p	4−5	20−22
QHD / 1440p	0−1	7−8
4K / 2160p	−	5−6
low / 720p	16−18	50−55
medium / 1080p	6−7	24−27
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W4300 in Battlefield 5 is 266% more, than FirePro M4100.
low / 768p	45−50	45−50
high / 1080p	40−45	−
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
FirePro M4100 and FirePro W4300 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone.
low / 768p	120−130	200−210
medium / 768p	95−100	170−180
ultra / 1080p	40−45	95−100
QHD / 1440p	24−27	50−55
4K / 2160p	18−20	30−33
high / 768p	65−70	140−150
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W4300 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 88% more, than FirePro M4100.
low / 768p	85−90	55−60
ultra / 1080p	16−18	35−40
medium / 1080p	40−45	45−50
The average gaming FPS of FirePro M4100 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 4% more, than FirePro W4300.
low / 768p	75−80	110−120
medium / 768p	50−55	90−95
ultra / 1080p	24−27	60−65
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W4300 in Dota 2 is 76% more, than FirePro M4100.
high / 1080p	2−3	16−18
ultra / 1080p	2−3	16−18
4K / 2160p	1−2	6−7
low / 720p	12−14	35−40
medium / 1080p	3−4	18−20
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W4300 in Far Cry 5 is 375% more, than FirePro M4100.
high / 1080p	10−11	24−27
ultra / 1080p	5−6	18−20
QHD / 1440p	2−3	16−18
low / 720p	50−55	95−100
medium / 1080p	12−14	50−55
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W4300 in Fortnite is 162% more, than FirePro M4100.
high / 1080p	4−5	24−27
ultra / 1080p	−	20−22
QHD / 1440p	0−1	9−10
low / 720p	18−20	50−55
medium / 1080p	7−8	27−30
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W4300 in Forza Horizon 4 is 250% more, than FirePro M4100.
low / 768p	45−50	85−90
medium / 768p	−	75−80
high / 1080p	5−6	27−30
ultra / 1080p	2−3	12−14
QHD / 1440p	0−1	3−4
medium / 720p	35−40	−
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W4300 in Grand Theft Auto V is 138% more, than FirePro M4100.
high / 1080p	1−2	9−10
ultra / 1080p	0−1	7−8
4K / 2160p	0−1	2−3
low / 720p	5−6	27−30
medium / 1080p	3−4	12−14
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W4300 in Metro Exodus is 466% more, than FirePro M4100.
low / 768p	90−95	110−120
high / 1080p	85−90	−
ultra / 1080p	70−75	100−110
medium / 1080p	90−95	100−110
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W4300 in Minecraft is 27% more, than FirePro M4100.
high / 1080p	−	21−24
ultra / 1080p	12−14	16−18
low / 720p	27−30	55−60
medium / 1080p	14−16	24−27
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W4300 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 83% more, than FirePro M4100.
high / 1080p	−	14−16
ultra / 1080p	4−5	9−10
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
low / 720p	6−7	27−30
medium / 1080p	−	16−18
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W4300 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 280% more, than FirePro M4100.
low / 768p	12−14	50−55
medium / 768p	9−10	30−35
high / 1080p	4−5	18−20
ultra / 1080p	3−4	10−12
4K / 2160p	0−1	8−9
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W4300 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 300% more, than FirePro M4100.
low / 768p	75−80	100−110
medium / 768p	35−40	60−65
ultra / 1080p	16−18	35−40
high / 768p	30−35	50−55
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W4300 in World of Tanks is 56% more, than FirePro M4100.

Full Specs

	FirePro M4100	FirePro W4300
Architecture	GCN	GCN 2.0
Code name	Mars	Bonaire
Type	Mobile workstation	Workstation
Release date	1 October 2013	1 December 2015
Pipelines	384	768
Core clock speed	670 MHz	930 MHz
Transistor count	950 million	2,080 million
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	28 nm
Texture fill rate	16.08	44.64
Floating-point performance	514.6 gflops	1,428 gflops
Length		171 mm
Memory bus width	128 Bit	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	4000 MHz	6000 MHz
Memory bandwidth	64 GB/s	96 GB/s
Shared memory	-
DirectX	12 (11_1)	12 (12_0)
Shader Model	5.1	6.3
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	1.2	2.0
Vulkan	1.2.131	1.2.131
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)	74 Mh/s	152 Mh/s
Laptop size	medium sized
	Check Price	Check Price

FirePro M4100 vs FirePro W4300

FirePro M4100 is a Laptop Graphics Card

Main Specs

Game benchmarks

Full Specs

Similar compares